Diagnosing glaucoma progression

International Ophthalmology Clinics

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 13-28

  Chang, Robert T ^a   Budenz, Donald L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERFEROMETRY; INTRAOCULAR HEMORRHAGE; OPTIC DISK ANOMALY; OPTIC DISK CUP; POLARIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA DISEASE; REVIEW; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS;

EID: 56149109341     PISSN: 00208167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e31818b63f0     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Giangiacomo A, Garway-Heath D, Caprioli J. Diagnosing glaucoma progression: current practice and promising technologies [review]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17: 153-162.
2. Spry PG, Johnson CA. Identification of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss [review]. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:158-173.
3. Kim J, Dally LG, Ederer F, et al; AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 14. Distinguishing progression of glaucoma from visual field fluctuations. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2109-2116.
4. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81:286-293.
5. Katz J. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:391-395.
6. Schulzer M. Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. The Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1589-1594.
7. Kent C. Progression software: ready for prime time? Rev Ophthalmol. 2006; 13:38-44.
8. Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goñi FJ, et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:569-573.
9. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:135-146.
10. Mikelberg FS, Yidegiligne HM, Schulzer M. Optic nerve axon count and axon diameter in patients with ocular hypertension and normal visual fields. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:342-348.
11. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, et al. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2242-2250.
12. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-748.
13. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:343-353.
14. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Ralli M, et al. Comparison of methods to predict visual field progression in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:1176-1181.
15. Vesti E, Johnson CA, Chauhan BC. Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3873-3879.
16. American Academy of Ophthalmology Glaucoma Panel. October 2006. Available at: http://www.aao.org/education/guidelines/ppp/upload/ Primary_Open_Angle_Glaucoma-2.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2008.
17. Lin SC, Singh K, Jampel HD, et al. American Academy of Ophthalmology; Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee Glaucoma Panel. Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1937-1949.
18. Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Berry CC, et al. The confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: study design and baseline factors. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:219-227.
19. Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, et al. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1492-1499.
20. Strouthidis NG, White ET, Owen VM, et al. Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1427-1432.
21. Miglior S, Albé E, Guareschi M, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1072-1077.
22. Jampel HD, Vitale S, Ding Y, et al. Test-retest variability in structural and functional parameters of glaucoma damage in the glaucoma imaging longitudinal study. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:152-157.
23. Fayers T, Strouthidis NG, Garway-Heath DF. Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis. Ophthalmology. 2007;114: 1973-1980 [Epub July 26, 2007].
24. Iacono P, Da Pozzo S, Fuser M, et al. Intersession reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by GDx-VCC in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmologica. 2006;220:266-271.
25. Frenkel S, Slonim E, Horani A, et al. Operator learning effect and interoperator reproducibility of the scanning laser polarimeter with variable corneal compensation. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:257-261.
26. Medeiros FA, Doshi R, Zangwill LM, et al. Long-term variability of GDx VCC retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:277-281.
27. Saito H, Tomidokoro A, Yanagisawa M, et al. Scanning laser polarimetry with enhanced corneal compensation in patients with open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:24-29.
28. Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Optical coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:464-470. Erratum in: Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1206.
29. Budenz DL, Fredette MJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with Stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2007 [Epub ahead of print, August 10].
30. Chang R, Budenz DL. New developments in optical coherence tomography for glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:127-135.
31. Tsai JC. How to evaluate a suspicious optic disc. Rev Ophthalmol. 2005;12:40-42.
32. Jonas JB, Martus P, Budde WM, et al. Small neuroretinal rim and large parapapillary atrophy as predictive factors for progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1561-1567.
33. Bowd C, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM. Evaluating the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. I: Clinical examination and photographic methods [review]. Semin Ophthalmol. 2000;15:194-205.
34. Tezel G, Kolker AE, Wax MB, et al. Parapapillary chorioretinal atrophy in patients with ocular hypertension II. An evaluation of progressive changes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1509.
35. Siegner SW, Netland PA. Optic disc hemorrhages and progression of glaucoma (see comments). Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1014.
36. Shihab ZM, Lee PF, Hay P. The significance of optic disc hemorrhage in open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992:89:211.
37. Sugiyama K, Tomira G, Kitazawa Y, et al. The association of optic disc hemorrhage with nerve fiber layer defect and peripapillary atrophy in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1926.
38. Read RM, Spaeth GL. The practical clinical appraisal of the optic disc in glaucoma: the natural history of cup progression and some specific disc-field correlations. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1974;78:255.
39. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453.
40. Sommer A, Miller NR, Pollack I, et al. The nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:2149.
41. Wollstein G. American Academy of Ophthalmology 2007 Annual Meeting: Scientific Poster 074. Presented November 11, 2007.