Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment

Ophthalmology

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 391-395

  Katz, Joanne ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE COURSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 0033510653     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90052-0     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland DE, Anderson DR. Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1684-9.
2. Brigatti L, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Weitzman M, Caprioli J. Automated detection of glaucomatous visual field progression with neural networks. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:725-8.
3. Werner EB, Bishop KI, Koelle J, et al. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:619-23.
4. Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:1419-28.
5. Birch MK, Wishart PK, O'Donnel NP. Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1227-35.
6. Chauhan BC, Drance SM, Douglas GR. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:512-20.
7. Noureddin BN, Poinoosawmy D, Fietzke FW, Hitchings RA. Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75:493-5.
8. Fitzke FW, McNaught AI. The diagnosis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1994;5:110-5.
9. Wild JM, Hussey MK, Flanagan JG, Trope GE. Pointwise topographical and longitudinal modeling of the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:1907-16.
10. Mandava S, Caprioli J, Zulauf M. Glaucoma pattern index to quantify glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma 1992;1: 178-83.
11. Katz J, Gilbert D, Quigley HA, Sommer A. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1017-25.
12. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Brigatti L, Weitzman M, Caprioli J. Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1228-36.
13. Sommer A, Quigley IIA, Robin AL, et al. Evaluation of nerve fiber layer assessment. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1766-71.
14. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:77-83.
15. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Investigators. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1445-55.
16. Katz J. Two eyes or one? The data analyst's dilemma. Ophthalmic Surg 1988;19:585-9.
17. Katz J, Quigley HA, Sommer A. Detection of incident field loss using the glaucoma hemifield test. Ophthalmology 1996; 103:657-63.
18. Katz J, Quigley HA, Sommer A. Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:1658-64.
19. Schulzer M, The Normal-tension Glaucoma Study Group. Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1589-95.
20. Schulzer M, Anderson DR. Drance SM. Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test determined by repeated observations in the absence of an external standard. J Clin Epidemiol 1991;44:1167-79.
21. Quigley HA, Addicks EM. Quantitative studies of retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:807-14.