The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in guiding eye movements during visual search

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1569-1576

  Zelinsky, Gregory J ^a,b   Zhang, Wei ^b   Yu, Bing ^b   Chen, Xin ^a   Samaras, Dimitris ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stony Brook University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL RETINAS; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; HUMAN OBSERVERS; HUMAN SEARCH; MIXTURE MODEL; MOVEMENT BEHAVIOR; NEURONAL POPULATIONS; SEARCH TASKS; TARGET REPRESENTATION; TD-MODEL; TOPDOWN; VISUAL SEARCH;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; MIXTURES; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EYE MOVEMENTS;

EID: 84864030651     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. A. Treisman and G. Gelade. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12:97-136, 1980.
2. J.Wolfe, K. Cave, and S. Franzel. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15:419-433, 1989.
3. J. Wolfe. Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1:202-238, 1994.
4. R. Rao, G. Zelinsky, M. Hayhoe, and D. Ballard. Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Research, 42:1447-1463, 2002.
5. C. Koch and S. Ullman. Shifts of selective visual attention: Toward the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4:219-227, 1985.
6. L. Itti and C. Koch. Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3):194-203, 2001.
7. L. Itti and C. Koch. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shift of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10-12):1489-1506, 2000.
8. R. Rao, G. Zelinsky, M. Hayhoe, and D. Ballard. Modeling saccadic targeting in visual search. In NIPS, 1995.
9. J.S. Perry and W.S. Geisler. Gaze-contingent real-time simulation of arbitrary visual fields. In SPIE, 2002.
10. R. M. Klein and W.J. MacInnes. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10(4):346-352, 1999.
11. C. A. Dickinson and G. Zelinsky. Marking rejected distractors: A gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, In press.
12. L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. PAMI, 20(11):1254-1259, 1998.
13. T. Sejnowski. Neural populations revealed. Nature, 332:308, 1988.
14. C. Lee, W. Rohrer, and D. Sparks. Population coding of saccadic eye movements by neurons in the superior colliculus. Nature, 332:357-360, 1988.
15. J. Findlay. Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 22:1033-1045, 1982.
16. G. Zelinsky, R. Rao, M. Hayhoe, and D. Ballard. Eye movements reveal the spatio-temporal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science, 8:448-453, 1997.
17. J. L. Elman. Finding structures in time. Cognitive Science, 14:179-211, 1990.
18. A. Toet, P. Bijl, F. L. Kooi, and J. M. Valeton. A high-resolution image dataset for testing search and detection models. Technical Report TNO-NM-98-A020, TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, The Netherlands, 1998.
19. V. Navalpakkam and L Itti. Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research, 45:205-231, 2005.
20. K. A. Turano, D. R. Geruschat, and F. H. Baker. Oculomotor strategies for direction of gaze tested with a real-world activity. Vision Research, 43(3):333-346, 2003.