Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors

Psychological Science

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 973-980

  Eckstein, Miguel P ^a   Drescher, Barbara A ^a   Shimozaki, Steven S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BAYES THEOREM; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ATTENTION; BAYES THEOREM; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBABILITY LEARNING; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33845321042     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Araujo, C., Kowler, E., & Pavel, M. (2001). Eye movements during visual search: The costs of choosing the optimal path. Vision Research, 41, 3613-3625.
2. Baldassi, S., & Verghese, P. (2002). Comparing integration rules in visual search. Journal of Vision, 2, 559-570.
3. Bashinski, H.S., & Bacharach, V.R. (1980). Enhancements of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 241-248.
4. Bennett, P.J., & Jaye, P.D. (1995). Letter localization, not discrimination, is constrained by attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 460-504.
5. Beutter, B.R., Eckstein, M.P., & Stone, L.S. (2003). Saccadic and perceptual performance in visual search tasks. I. Contrast detection and discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 20, 1341-1355.
6. Biederman, I. (1981). Do background depth gradients facilitate object identification? Perception, 10, 573-578.
7. Burgess, A.E., & Ghandeharian, H. (1984). Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 8, 906-910.
8. Chun, M.M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
9. Downing, C.J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 188-202.
10. Eckstein, M.P., Shimozaki, S.S., & Abbey, C.K. (2002). The footprints of visual attention in the Posner cueing paradigm revealed by classification images. Journal of Vision, 2, 25-45.
11. Findlay, J.M. (1997). Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research, 37, 617-631.
12. Green, D.M., & Swets, J.A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York; Wiley.
13. Hawkins, H.L., Hillyard, S.A., Luck, S.J., Mouloua, M., Downing, C.J., & Woodward, D.P. (1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 16, 802-811.
14. Hayhoe, M., & Ballard, D. (2005). Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 188-194.
15. Henderson, J.M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498-504.
16. Henderson, J.M., & Hollingworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance while reading and while watching dynamic scenes (pp. 269-293). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
17. Henderson, J.M., Weeks, P.A., Jr., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210-228.
18. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
19. Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 271-304.
20. Killeen, P.R. (2005). An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests. Psychological Science, 16, 345-353.
21. Kinchla, R.A., Chen, Z., & Evert, D. (1995). Precue effects in visual search: Data or resource limited? Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 441-450.
22. Luck, S.J., Hillyard, S.A., Mouloua, M., & Hawkins, H.L. (1996). Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 725-737.
23. McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
24. Morgan, M.J., Ward, R.M., & Castet, E. (1998). Visual search for a tilted target: Tests of spatial uncertainty models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 51, 347-370.
25. Najemnik, J., & Geisler, W.S. (2005). Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature, 434, 387-391.
26. Oliva, A., Torralba, A., Castelhano, M.S., & Henderson, J.M. (2003). Top-down control of visual attention in object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (Vol. I, pp. 253-256). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
27. Palmer, J., Ames, C.T., & Lindsey, D.T. (1993). Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 108-130.
28. Palmer, J., Verghese, P., & Pavel, M. (2000). The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1227-1268.
29. Peterson, W.W., Birdsall, T.G., & Fox, W.C. (1954). The theory of signal detectability. Transactions of the Institute of Radio Engineers Professional Group on Information Theory, 4, 171-212.
30. Posner, M.I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
31. Rao, R.P., Zelinsky, G.J., Hayhoe, M.M., & Ballad, D.H. (2002). Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Research, 42, 1447-1463.
32. Shaw, M.L. (1982). Attending to multiple sources of information: 1. The integration of information in decision-making. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 353-409.
33. Shimozaki, S.S., Eckstein, M.P., & Abbey, C.K. (2003). Comparison of two weighted integration models for the cueing task: Linear and likelihood. Journal of Vision, 3, 209-229.
34. Shimozaki, S.S., Schoonveld, W, & Eckstein, M.P. (2005, May). An ideal observer approach to unifying set size and cueing effects for perceptual and saccadic decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
35. Talgar, C.P., Pelli, D.G., & Carrasco, M. (2004). Covert attention enhances letter identification without affecting channel tuning. Journal of Vision, 4, 22-31.
36. Torralba, A. (2003). Modeling global scene factors in attention. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 20, 1407-1418.
37. VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S.J. (2001). Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultrarapid visual categorisation of natural and artifactual objects. Perception, 30, 655-668.
38. Zelinsky, G.J., & Sheinberg, D.L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 244-262.