Is object search mediated by object-based or image-based representations?

Spatial Vision

Volumn 17, Issue 4-5, 2004, Pages 511-541

  Newell, Fiona N ^a   Brown, Valerie ^b   Findlay, John M ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Object representations; Object search; Orientation dependent search; Scene perception

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); OBJECT RECOGNITION; TARGETS;

CHANGE DETECTION PARADIGMS; TARGET OBJECTS; VISUAL PROCESSING; VISUAL SEARCH;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; ORIENTATION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 6444227373     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/1568568041920140     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. H. and Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks, J. Cognitive Neurosci. 7 (1), 66-80.
2. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. H., Pook, P. K. and Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 20 (4), 723.
3. Bartram, D. J. (1976). Levels of coding in picture-picture comparison tasks, Memory and Cognition 4, 593-602.
4. Bennett, S. C. and Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Serial visual search can proceed at 50 milliseconds per item, Investigative Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 37 (3), 1373.
5. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding, Psychol. Rev. 94, 115-147.
6. Biederman, I. and Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognising depth-rotated objects: evidence for 3D viewpoint invariance, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 19 (6), 1162-1182.
7. Biederman, I., Buckle, T. W., Teitelbaum, R. C., Klatsky, G. J. and Mezzanotte, R. J. (1988). Object identification in nonscene displays, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14, 456-467.
8. Bravo, M. J. and Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks, Perception and Psychophysics 51 (5), 465-472.
9. Brown, J. M., Weisstein, N. and May, J. G. (1992). Visual search for simple volumetric primitives, Perception and Psychophysics 51 (1), 40-48.
10. Bülthoff, H. H. and Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 89, 60-64.
11. Duncan, J. and Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity, Psychol. Rev. 96, 433-458.
12. Edelman, S. (1995). Class similarity and view-point invariance in the recognition of 3D objects, Biological Cybernetics 72, 207-220.
13. Edelman, S. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects, Vision Research 32, 2385-2400.
14. Egeth, H. E. and Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation and time course, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48, 269-297.
15. Enns, J. T. (1992). Sensitivity of early human vision to 3D orientation in line drawings, Canad. J. Psychol. 46, 143-169.
16. Enns, J. T. and Rensink, R. A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings, Psychol Rev. 98, 101-118.
17. Henderson, J. M. and Hollingworth, A. (1999). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades, Psychol. Sci. 10 (5), 438-443.
18. Henderson, J. M. and Hollingworth, A. (2000). High-level scene perception, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50, 243-271.
19. Henderson, J. M. and Hollingworth, A. (2003). Eye movements and visual memory: detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes, Perception and Psychophysics 65 (1), 58-71.
20. Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A. and Rayner, K. (1987). Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 13, 449-463.
21. Henderson, J. M. and Siefert, A. B. C. (1999). The influence of enantiomorphic information on transsaccadic object integration, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1), 243-255.
22. Hollingworth, A. and Henderson, J. M. (2000). Semantic informativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes, Visual Cognition 7 (1-3), 213-235.
23. Hollingworth, A. and Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes, J. Exper. Psychol: Human Perception and Performance 28 (1), 113-136.
24. Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C. and Henderson, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes, Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 8 (4), 761-768.
25. Humphrey, K. and Khan, S. C. (1992). Recognising novel views of three-dimensional objects, Canad. J. Psychol 46, 170-190.
26. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects, Memory and Cognition 13, 289-303.
27. Julesz, B. and Bergen, J. R. (1983). Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures, Bell System Technical Journal 62, 1619-1645.
28. Lubow, R. and Kaplan, O. (1997). Visual search as a function of type of prior experience with target and distractor, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 23, 14-24.
29. Murray, J. E. (1997). Flipping and spinning: Spatial transformation procedures in the identification of rotated natural objects, Memory and Cognition 25 (1), 96-105.
30. Nakayama, K. and Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions, Nature 320, 264-265.
31. Nakayama, K. and Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention, Vision Research 29, 1631-1647.
32. Newell, F. N. (1993). Perceptual recognition of familiar objects across changes in orientation, Unpublished PhD thesis.
33. Newell, F. N. (1998). Stimulus context and view dependence in object recognition, Perception 27, 47-68.
34. Newell, F. N. and Findlay, J. M. (1997). The effect of depth rotation on object identification, Perception 26, 1231-1257.
35. Palmer, S. E., Rosch, E. and Chase, P. (1981). Canonical Perspective and the perception of objects, in: Attention and Performance IX, Long, J. and Baddeley, A. (Eds), pp. 135-151. LEA, New Jersey.
36. Rensink, R. A. (2000). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing, Vision Research 40 (10-12), 1469-1487.
37. Shepard, R. N. and Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects, Science 171, 701-703.
38. Simons, D. J. and Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science 1, 261-267.
39. Tarr, M. J. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural-descriptions or by multiple-views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993), J. Exper. Psychol: Human Perception and Performance 21 (6), 1494-1505.
40. Tarr, M. J. and Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition, Cognitive Psychology 21, 233-282.
41. Tarr, M. J., Bülthoff, H. H., Zabinsky, M. and Blanz, V. (1997). To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoint? Psychol. Sci. 8 (4), 282-289.
42. Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention, Cognitive Psychology 12, 97-136.
43. Treisman, A. and Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries, Psychol Rev. 95 (1), 15-48.
44. Treisman, A. and Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited, J. Exper. Psychol: Human Perception and Performance 16, 459-478.
45. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0. A revised model of visual search, Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 1 (2), 202-238.
46. Wolfe, J. M. and Bennett, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features, Vision Research 37(1), 25-43.
47. Zelinsky, G. J. (1996). Using eye movements to assess the selectivity of search movements, Vision Research 36 (14), 2177-2187.