Marking rejected distractors: A gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1120-1126

  Dickinson, Christopher A ^a   Zelinsky, Gregory J ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646753046     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206453     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. AKS, D. J., ZELINSKY, G. J., & SPROTT, J. C. (2002). Memory across eye-movements: 1/f dynamic in visual search. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, & Life Sciences, 6, 1-25.
2. CHUN, M. M., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2000). On the functional role of implicit visual memory for the adaptive deployment of attention across scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 65-81.
3. DICKINSON, C., CHEN, X., & ZELINSKY, G. (2003). Explicitly marking rejected distractors in an overt visual search task [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3, 158a.
4. DICKINSON, C., & ZELINSKY, G. (2002). Sitting and waiting for the tar get: A strategy for searching dynamic displays. Abstracts of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 94.
5. GILCHRIST, I. D., & HARVEY, M. (2000). Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology, 10, 1209-1212.
6. HOOGE, I. T. C., & ERKELENS, C. J. (1998). Adjustment of fixation duration in visual search. Vision Research, 38, 1295-1302.
7. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-577.
8. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2001). Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 272-285.
9. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2003). Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? Visual Cognition, 10, 257-287.
10. KLEIN, R. M., & MACINNES, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual research. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
11. KRISTJÁNSSON, A. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science, 11, 328-332.
12. MCCARLEY, J. S., WANG, R. F., KRAMER, A. F., IRWIN, D. E., & PETERSON, M. S. (2003). How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14, 422-426.
13. MÜHLENEN, A. VON, MÜLLER, H. J., & MÜLLER, D. (2003). Sit-and-wait strategies in dynamic visual search. Psychological Science, 14, 309-314.
14. MÜLLER, H. J., & MÜHLENEN, A. VON (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1591-1605.
15. O'REGAN, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
16. PETERSON, M. S., BECK, M. R., & VOMELA, M. (2004, May). The guidance of attention by retrospective and prospective memory during visual search. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
17. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., WANG, R. F., IRWIN, D. E., & MCCARLEY, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287-292.
18. SHORE, D. I., & KLEIN, R. M. (2000). On the manifestations of memory in visual search. Spatial Vision, 14, 59-75.
19. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., HAHN, S., IRWIN, D. E., & ZELINSKY, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1595-1608.
20. TOET, A., BIJL, P., KOOI, F. L., & VALETON, J. M. (1998). A high-resolution image dataset for testing search and detection models (TNO-NM-98-A020). Soesterberg, The Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Research Institute.
21. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
22. WOJCIULIK, E., RORDEN, C., CLARKE, K., HUSAIN, M., & DRIVER, J. (2004). Group study of an "undercover" test for visuospatial neglect: Invisible cancellation can reveal more neglect than standard cancellation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 75, 1356-1358.
23. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
24. WOODMAN, G. F., VOGEL, E. K., & LUCK, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219-224.