Clinical Efficacy of the Noncompliance Appliances Used for Class II Orthodontic Correction

Orthodontic Treatment of the Class II Noncompliant Patient

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 367-387

  Papadopoulos, Moschos A ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54849417878     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7234-3391-0.50032-X     Document Type: Chapter

References (96)

1. Pancherz H Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1979, 76:423-442.
2. Pancherz H The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982, 82:104-113.
3. Pancherz H The Herbst appliance - its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985, 87:1-20.
4. Pancherz H, Hansen K Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 1986, 8:215-228.
5. Pancherz H, Hansen K Mandibular anchorage in Herbst treatment. Eur J Orthod 1988, 10:149-164.
6. Pancherz H, Malmgren O, Hagg U, Omblus J, Hansen K Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. Eur J Orthod 1989, 11:17-30.
7. Valant JR, Sinclair PM Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989, 95:138-147.
8. Pancherz H, Fackel U The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1990, 12:209-218.
9. Hansen K, Pancherz H, Hagg U Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1991, 13:471-481.
10. Hansen K, Pancherz H Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1992, 14:285-295.
11. Windmiller EC The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993, 104:73-84.
12. Hansen K, Koutsonas TG, Pancherz H Long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the mandibular incisor segment: a cephalometric and biometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997, 112:92-103.
13. Obijou C, Pancherz H Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997, 112:287-291.
14. Omblus J, Malmgren O, Pancherz H, Hagg U, Hansen K Long-term effects of Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. Eur J Orthod 1997, 19:185-193.
15. Wong GW, So LL, Hagg U A comparative study of sagittal correction with the Herbst appliance in two different ethnic groups. Eur J Orthod 1997, 19:195-204.
16. Croft RS, Buschang PH, English JD, Meyer R A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999, 116:435-443.
17. Hagg U, Du X, Rabie AB Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002, 122:477-485.
18. Burkhardt DR, McNamara JA, Baccetti T Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003, 123:108-116.
19. Pancherz H The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991, 100:220-233.
20. Konik M, Pancherz H, Hansen K The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997, 112:87-91.
21. Ruf S, Pancherz H The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 1997, 67:271-276.
22. Ruf S, Pancherz H Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 1999, 69:239-246.
23. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Treatment and post-treatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999, 115:429-438.
24. Nelson B, Hansen K, Hagg U Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000, 118:142-149.
25. Du X, Hagg U, Rabie AB Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 2002, 24:167-174.
26. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003, 124:128-137.
27. Wieslander L Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1984, 86:1-13.
28. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993, 103:510-520.
29. Wieslander L Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993, 104:319-329.
30. McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG A comparison of the Herbst and Frankel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990, 98:134-144.
31. Sidhu MS, Kharbanda OP, Sidhu SS Cephalometric analysis of changes produced by a modified Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Br J Orthod 1995, 22:1-12.
32. Eberhard H, Hirschfelder U Treatment of Class II, Division 2 in the late growth period. J Orofac Orthop 1998, 59:352-361.
33. Schweitzer M, Pancherz H The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2001, 71:358-363.
34. Baltromejus S, Ruf S, Pancherz H Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 2002, 24:627-637.
35. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Kohlhas P Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998, 114:437-446.
36. Pancherz H, Hagg U Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod 1985, 88:273-287.
37. Hansen K, Iemamnueisuk P, Pancherz H Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance on the dental arches and arch relationships: a biometric study. Br J Orthod 1995, 22:123-134.
38. Ruf S, Pancherz H The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996, 110:225-229.
39. Schiavoni R, Grenga V, Macri V Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992, 102:393-409.
40. Eicke C, Wieslander L [Soft-tissue profile changes through therapy with the Herbst hinge appliance.]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990, 100:149-153.
41. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 1994, 16:275-286.
42. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Thomalske-Faubert C Mandibular articular disk position changes during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal MRI study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999, 116:207-214.
43. Hansen K, Pancherz H, Petersson A Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance on the craniomandibular system with special reference to the TMJ. Eur J Orthod 1990, 12:244-253.
44. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M The effect of continuous bite jumping with the Herbst appliance on the masticatory system: a functional analysis of treated Class II malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1982, 4:37-44.
45. Hansen K Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation. Swed Dent J Suppl 1992, 88:1-49.
46. Ruf S, Pancherz H Long-term TMJ effects of Herbst treatment: a clinical and MRI study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998, 114:475-483.
47. Ruf S, Pancherz H Does bite-jumping damage the TMJ? A prospective longitudinal clinical and MRI study of Herbst patients. Angle Orthod 2000, 70:183-199.
48. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M Muscle activity in Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated by bite jumping with the Herbst appliance. An electromyographic study. Am J Orthod 1980, 78:321-329.
49. Leung DK, Hagg U An electromyographic investigation of the first six months of progressive mandibular advancement of the Herbst appliance in adolescents. Angle Orthod 2001, 71:177-184.
50. Hiyama S, Ono PT, Ishiwata Y, Kuroda T, McNamara JA Neuromuscular and skeletal adaptations following mandibular forward positioning induced by the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 2000, 70:442-453.
51. Athanasiou AE, Papadopoulos MA, Nasiopoulos AT, Ioannidou I, Kolokithas G Changes in the mechanical advantages of the masseter and temporal muscles and the number and intensity of occlusal contacts following Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: an early evaluation. J Marmara Univ Dental Faculty 2004, 5:435-444.
52. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003, 123:286-295.
53. Weiland FJ, Ingervall B, Bantleon HP, Droschl H Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997, 112:19-27.
54. Stucki N, Ingervall B The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition. Eur J Orthod 1998, 20:271-281.
55. Covell DA, Trammell DW, Boero RP, West R A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance. Angle Orthod 1999, 69:311-320.
56. Sari Z, Goyenc Y, Doruk C, Usumez S Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination. Angle Orthod 2003, 73:286-293.
57. Weiland FJ, Bantleon HP Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance. A preliminary report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995, 108:341-350.
58. Cope JB, Buschang PH, Cope DD, Parker J, Blackwood HO Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy. Angle Orthod 1994, 64:113-122.
59. Heinig N, Goz G Clinical application and effects of the Forsus spring. A study of a new Herbst hybrid. J Orofac Orthop 2001, 62:436-450.
60. Stromeyer EL, Caruso JM, DeVincenzo JP A cephalometric study of the Class II correction effects of the Eureka Spring. Angle Orthod 2002, 72:203-210.
61. Bussick TJ, McNamara JA Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000, 117:333-343.
62. Toroglu MS, Uzel I, Cam OY, Hancioglu ZB Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of pendulum appliance on various vertical growth patterns and of the changes during short-term stabilization. Clin Orthod Res 2001, 4:15-27.
63. Joseph AA, Butchart CJ An evaluation of the pendulum distalizing appliance. Semin Orthod 2000, 6:129-135.
64. Chaques-Asensi J, Kalra V Effects of the pendulum appliance on the dentofacial complex. J Clin Orthod 2001, 35:254-257.
65. Ghosh J, Nanda RS Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996, 110:639-646.
66. Hilgers JJ The pendulum appliance for Class II noncompliance therapy. J Clin Orthod 1992, 26:706-714.
67. Ten Hoeve A Palatal bar and lip bumper in nonextraction treatment. J Clin Orthod 1985, 19:272-291.
68. Gianelly AA, Vaitas AS, Thomas WM, Berger OG Distalization of molars with repelling magnets, case report. J Clin Orthod 1988, 22:40-44.
69. Jeckel N, Rakosi T Molar distalization by intra-oral force application. Eur J Orthod 1991, 3:43-46.
70. Gianelly AA, Vaitas AS, Thomas WM The use of magnets to move molars distally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989, 96:161-167.
71. Gianelly AA, Bednar J, Dietz VS Japanese NiTi coils used to move molars distally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991, 99:564-566.
72. Bondemark L, Kurol J, Bernhold M Repelling magnets versus superelastic nickel-titanium coils in simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars. Angle Orthod 1994, 64:189-198.
73. Kinzinger GS, Fritz UB, Sander FG, Diedrich PR Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004, 125:8-23.
74. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA, Hunter WS An atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from the University School Growth Study, The University of Michigan. Craniofacial Growth Monograph Series 1974, Vol. 2. Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
75. Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation. Angle Orthod 1997, 67:249-260.
76. Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA, Clar E, Darendeliler A Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: The effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bands. Angle Orthod 1997, 67:261-270.
77. Kinzinger G, Fuhrmann R, Gross U, Diedrich P Modified pendulum appliance including distal screw and uprighting activation for noncompliance therapy of Class II malocclusion in children and adolescents. J Orofac Orthop 2000, 61:175-190.
78. Kinzinger G, Fritz U, Diedrich P Combined therapy with pendulum and lingual arch appliances in the early mixed dentition. J Orofac Orthop 2003, 64:201-213.
79. Keles A, Sayinsu K A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000, 117:39-48.
80. Ngantung V, Nanda RS, Bowman SJ Postreatment evaluation of the distal jet appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001, 120:178-185.
81. Nishii Y, Katada H, Yamaguchi H Three-dimensional evaluation of the distal jet appliance. World J Orthod 2002, 3:321-327.
82. Bolla E, Muratore F, Carano A, Bowman SJ Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods. Angle Orthod 2002, 72:481-494.
83. Keles A Maxillary unilateral molar distalization with sliding mechanics: a preliminary investigation. Eur J Orthod 2001, 23:507-515.
84. Bondemark L A comparative analysis of distal maxillary molar movement produced by a new lingual intra-arch NiTi coil appliance and a magnetic appliance. Eur J Orthod 2000, 22:683-695.
85. Gulati S, Kharbanda OP, Parkash H Dental and skeletal changes after intraoral molar distalization with sectional jig assembly. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998, 114:319-327.
86. Runge ME, Martin JT, Bukai F Analysis of rapid maxillary molar distal movement without patient cooperation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999, 115:153-157.
87. Brickman CD, Sinha PK, Nanda RS Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000, 118:526-534.
88. Haydar S, Uner O Comparison of Jones jig molar distalization appliance with extraoral traction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000, 117:49-53.
89. Paul LD, O'Brien KD, Mandall NA Upper removable appliance or Jones jig for distalizing first molars? A randomized clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002, 5:238-242.
90. Papadopoulos MA, Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A Cephalometric changes following simultaneous first and second maxillary molar distalization using a noncompliance intraoral appliance. J Orofac Orthop 2004, 65:123-136.
91. Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kiliaridis S, Papadopoulos MA Efficiency of noncompliance simultaneous first and second upper molar distalization: a 3D tooth movement analysis. Angle Orthod 2005, 75:468-475.
92. Erverdi N, Koyuturk O, Kucukkeles N Nickel-titanium coil springs and repelling magnets: a comparison of two different intra-oral molar distalization techniques. Br J Orthod 1997, 24:47-53.
93. Bondemark L, Kurol J Distalization of maxillary first and second molars simultaneously with repelling magnets. Eur J Orthod 1992, 14:264-272.
94. Itoh T, Tokuda T, Kiyosue S, Hirose T, Matsumoto M, Chaconas SJ Molar distalization with repelling magnets. J Clin Orthod 1991, 25:611-617.
95. Fortini A, Lupoli M, Giuntoli F, Franchi L Dentoskeletal effects induced by rapid molar distalization with the first class appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004, 125:697-705.
96. Dahlquist A, Gebauer U, Ingervall B The effect of a transpalatal arch for the correction of first molar rotation. Eur J Orthod 1996, 18:257-267.