A cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 311-320

  Covell, David A ^a,b   Trammell, Dennis W ^c   Boero, Roger P ^b   West, Richard ^b  

^a RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Class II correction; Dentoalveolar; Jasper Jumper; Skeletal growth

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REFERENCE VALUE;

ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES; ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; ORTHODONTICS, INTERCEPTIVE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 0033174955     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Jasper JJ. The Jasper Jumper - a fixed functional appliance. Sheboygan, Wisc: American Orthodontics, 1987.
2. Jasper JJ, McNamara JA Jr. The correction of interarch malocclusions using a fixed force module. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;108:641-50.
3. Cope JB, Buschang PH, Cope DD, Parker J, Blackwood HO. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy. Angle Orthod 1994; 64:113-22.
4. Weiland FJ, Bantleon HP. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with Jasper Jumper appliance - a preliminary report Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108:341-50.
5. Stucki N, Ingervall B.The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:271-81.
6. Weiland FJ, Ingervall B, Bantleon HP, Droschl H. Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;112:19-27.
7. Cash RG. Adult nonextraction treatment with a Jasper Jumper. J Clin Orthod, 1991;25:43-47.
8. Blackwood HO. Clinical management of the Jasper Jumper. J Clin Orthod 1991; 25:755-60.
9. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Case Report Modified use of the Jasper Jumper appliance in a skeletal Class II mixed dentition case requiring palatal expansion. Angle Orthod 1997;67:277-82.
10. Rankin TH. Correction of Class II malocclusions with a fixed functional appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;100:390.
11. Kucukkeles N, Orgun A. Correction of Class II malocclusions with a Jasper Jumper in growing patients. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:445.
12. Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:1-46.
13. Björk A, Skieller V. Postnatal growth and development of the maxillary complex. In: McNamara JA, ed. Factors affecting growth of the midface. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1976;6:62-99.
14. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA Jr, Hunter W. An atlas of craniofacial growth. Cephalometric Standards from the University School Growth Study. Monograph 2, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1974.
15. Valant Jr, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989;95:138-47.
16. Pancherz, H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment Am J Orthod 1982;82:104-13.
17. Wieslander L. The effect of orthodontic treatment on the concurrent development of the craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod 1963;49:15-27.
18. Sandusky W. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Kloehn type of cervical traction used as an auxiliary with the edgewise mechanism following Tweed's principles for correction of Class II Division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1965; 51:262-87.
19. Poulton DR. The influence of extra-oral traction. Am J Orthod 1967;53:8-18.
20. Adams CP, Meikle MC, Norwick KW, Turpin DL. Dentofacial remodeling produced by intermaxillary forces in Macaca mulatta. Arch Oral Biol 1972;17:1519-35.
21. Creekmore TD, Radney LJ. Frankel appliance therapy: Orthopedic and orthodontic? Am J Orthod 1983;83:89-108.
22. Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985;88:242-51.
23. Cura N, Muyesser S, Ozturk Y, Surmeli N. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of activator, activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: A comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 110:36-45.
24. Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by bite jumping with the Herbst appliance: A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1979;76:423-42.
25. Brodie A G. Cephalometric appraisal of orthodontic results. Angle Orthod 1938; 8:261.
26. Holdaway RA. Changes in relationship of points A and B during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1956;42:176-93.
27. Jakobsson SO. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, Division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1967; 53:446-57.
28. Teuscher U. Edgewise therapy with cervical and intermaxillary traction-influence on the position of the bony chin. Angle Orthod 1983;53:212-27.
29. Derringer K. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andressen therapy in the treatment of Class D, Division 1 malocclusion, part 1: Skeletal changes. Br J Orthod 1990; 17:33-46.
30. Derringer K. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andressen therapy in the treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion, part 2: Dentoalveolar changes. Br J Orthod 1990;17:89-99.
31. Marschner JF, Harris JE. Mandibular growth and Class II treatment. Angle Orthod 1966;36:89-93.
32. McNamara JA Jr. Dentofacial adaptations in adult patients following function regulator therapy. Am J Orthod 1984; 85:57-71.
33. McNamara JA Jr, Bookstein F, Shaughnessy T. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy. Am J Orthod 1985;88:91-111.
34. Hamilton SD, Sinclair PM, Hamilton RH. A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Frankel therapy. Am J Orthod 1987;92:427-34.
35. Björk A. The principle of the Andressen method of orthodontic treatment, a discussion based on cephalometric x-ray analysis of treated cases. Am J Orthod 1951;37:437-58.
36. Harvold EP, Vargervik K. Morphogenic response to activator treatment. Am J Orthod 1971;60:478-90.
37. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. Am J Orthod 1987;92:181-98.
38. Epstein WN. Analysis of changes in molar relationship by means of extra-oral anchorage (head-cap) in treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1948;18:63-70.
39. Wieslander L. The effect of force on craniofacial development. Am J Orthod 1974; 65:531-37.
40. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982;82:104-13.
41. Righellis EG. Treatment effects of Frankel activator and extraoral traction appliance. Angle Orthod 1983;53:107-21.
42. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1948;34:812-53.
43. Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of growth. Angle Orthod 1957;27:14-37.
44. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959;29:8-29.
45. Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod 1980;7:145-61.
46. Pancherz H. The effects, limitations and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod 1997;3:232-43.