Class II correction in patients treated with Class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: A comparative study

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 142-149

  Nelson, Birgitta ^a   Hansen, Ken ^b   Hägg, Urban ^c  

^a Public Dental Health Service   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; STATISTICS; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); STATISTICS; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0034243229     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.104489     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gianelly AA. A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise and Fränkel appliances. Am J Orthod 1984;86:269-762.
2. Remmer KR, Mamandras AH, Hunter WS, Way DC. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance. Am J Orthod 1985;88:363-72.
3. Adenvalla ST, Kronman JH. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances. Angle Orthod 1985;55:281-97.
4. Pancherz H, Malmgren O, Hägg U, ömblus J, Hansen K. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy: the mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11:17-30.
5. McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:134-44.
6. Weichbrodt L, Ingervall B. Treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion with the activator and with the Begg technique. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1992;102:1037-45.
7. Tulloch JFC, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:340-7.
8. Begg PR, Kesling PC. Begg orthodontic theory and technique. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1977.
9. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance - its biological effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985;87:1-20.
10. Nelson B, Hansen K, Hägg U. Overjet reduction and molar correction in fixed appliance treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions: sagittal and vertical components. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:13-23.
11. Hansen K. Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance: a radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation. Swed Dent J Suppl 1992;88;5-49.
12. Karlberg J, Hägg U, Pancherz H. Growth analysis using the infancy-childhood-puberty (ICP) model: assessing the age at pubertal maximum and the pubertal path of growth. In: Hernandez M, Argente J, editors. Human growth: basic and clinical aspects. New York: Excerpta Medica; 1992.
13. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. Am J Orthod 1982;82:104-13.
14. Björk A. The face in profile [thesis]. Swed Dent J Suppl 1947;40:30-50.
15. Jacobson SO. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1967;53:446-55.
16. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biology students. London: Allen and Unwin; 1940.
17. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:215-28.
18. Aelbers CM, Dermaut LR. Orthopedics in orthodontics, part I: fiction or reality - a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:513-9.
19. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J Suppl 1982;15:189-96.
20. Ruf S, Pancherz H. The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:225-9.