Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: A cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 108-116

  Burkhardt, Donald R ^a   McNamara Jr , James A ^a,b,c   Baccetti, Tiziano ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID; STAINLESS STEEL; ACRYLIC ACID RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; ORTHODONTICS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX RATIO; SPLINT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHILD; CHIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; ROTATION; STATISTICS; TOOTH CROWN;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; CROWNS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MOLAR; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROTATION; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS; TOOTH MOVEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037316193     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.7     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Moyers RE, Riolo ML, Guire KE, Wainright RL, Bookstein FL. Differential diagnosis of Class II malocclusions. Part 1. Facial types associated with Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1980;78:477-94.
2. McNamara JA Jr. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981;51:177-202.
3. Herbst E. Atlas und Grundriss der Zahnärztlichen Orthopädie. Munich: J. F. Lehmann Verlag; 1910.
4. Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1979;76:423-42.
5. Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:706-14.
6. Pancherz H. The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:49-60.
7. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982;82:104-13.
8. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J Supp 1982;15:189-96.
9. Pancherz H. The Herbst applianceuits biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985;87:1-20.
10. Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation, an analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod 1988;88:273-87.
11. Pancherz H. The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:220-33.
12. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. Muscle activity in Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated by bite jumping with the Herbst appliance. An electromyographic study. Am J Orthod 1980;78:321-9.
13. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. The effect of continuous bite jumping with the Herbst appliance on the masticatory system: a functional analysis of treated Class II malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:37-44.
14. Pancherz H, Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:209-18.
15. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:215-28.
16. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Mandibular anchorage in Herbst treatment. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:149-64.
17. Pancherz H, Hägg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod 1985;88:273-87.
18. Pancherz H, Malmgren O, Hägg U, Omblus J, Hansen K. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. Eur J Orthod 1989;11: 17-30.
19. Hagg U, Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:169-76.
20. Wieslander L. JCO interviews Dr. Lennart Wieslander on dentofacial orthopedics. Headgear-Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. J Clin Orthod 1984;18:551-64.
21. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1984;86:1-13.
22. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:134-44.
23. Lai M, McNamara JA Jr. An evaluation of two-phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy. Semin Orthod 1998;4:46-58.
24. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Treament and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:429-38.
25. Langford NM, Jr. The Herbst appliance. J Clin Orthod 1980;15:58-61.
26. Dischinger TG. Edgewise bioprogressive Herbst appliance. J Clin Orthod 1989;23:608-17.
27. Smith JR. Matching the Herbst to the malocclusion. Clin Impressions 1998;7:6-12, 20-23.
28. Mayes JH. Improving appliance efficiency with the cantilever Herbstua new answer to old problems. Clin Impressions 1994;3:2-5,17-19.
29. Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:639-46.
30. Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: clinical and radiological evaluation. Angle Orthod 1997;67:249-60.
31. Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA, Clar E, Darendeliler A. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: the effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends. Angle Orthod 1997;67:261-70.
32. Wieslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:319-29.
33. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:510-20.
34. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance. Seville: Editorial Aguiram;1995.
35. Pancherz H. The effect, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod 1997;3:232-43.
36. Bussick TJ, McNamara JA Jr. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:333-43.
37. McNamara JA Jr. Fabrication of the acrylic splint Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:10-8.
38. McNamara JA Jr, Brudon WL. Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Ann Arbor: Needham Press; 2001.
39. Smith JR. Matching the Herbst to the malocclusion: Part II. Clin Impressions 1999;8:14-23.
40. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP. Clinical management of the acrylic splint Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:142-9.
41. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984;86:449-69.
42. McNamara JA Jr, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. Am J Orthod 1985;88:91-110.
43. Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod 1981;51:115-50.
44. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953;39:729-55.
45. Feinstein A. Clinical epidemiology: the architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1985.
46. Johnston LE Jr, Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Cassidy DW Jr, McCray JF, Killiany DM. The reduction of susceptibility bias in retrospective comparisons of alternative treatment strategies. In: Vig KD, Vig PS, editors. Clinical research as the basis of clinical practice. Ann Arbor: Monograph 25, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1991.
47. Pancherz H. Personal communication; February 24, 2000.
48. Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod 1980;7:145-61.
49. Lande MJ. Growth behavior of the human bony facial profile as revealed by serial cephalometric roentgenology. Angle Orthod 1952;22:78-90.
50. Johnston LE Jr. Growth and the Class II patient: rendering unto Caesar. Semin Orthod 1998;4:59-62.
51. Falck F. Kephalometrische Längsschnittuntersuchung über Behandlungsergebnisse der mandibulären Retrognathie mit Funktionsreglen im Vergleich zu einer Lontrollgruppe. Berlin: Med Dissertation; 1985.
52. Fränkel R, Fränkel C. Orofacial orthopedics with the function regulator. Munich: S. Karger; 1989.
53. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the Twin Block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:24-33.