The Incisor-Lip Relationship in Herbst/Multibracket Appliance Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusions

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 358-363

  Schweitzer, Markus ^a   Pancherz, Hans ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Class II, division 2 malocclusion; Deep bite; Herbst appliance; Lower lip position; Relapse; Roentgenographic cephalometry; Stability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; LIP; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RECURRENT DISEASE; STATISTICS; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CEPHALOMETRY; HUMANS; INCISOR; LIP; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; RECURRENCE; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0035490170     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Mayrhofer B. Lehrbuch der Zahnheilkunde. Jena, Germany: Fischer, 1933.
2. Ridley DR. Some factors concerned with the reduction of excessive incisor overbite in Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion. Trans Brit Soc Study Orthod. 1960:118-140.
3. Angle EH. Okklusionsanomalien der Zähne. Philadelphia, Pa: SS White Dental Manufacturing; 1908.
4. Nicol WA. The morphology of the lips in relation to the incisor teeth. Trans Brit Soc Study Orthod. 1954:25-28.
5. Nicol WA. The relationship of the lip line to the incisor teeth. Trans Brit Soc Study Orthod. 1955:75-81.
6. Ballard CF The significance of soft tissue morphology in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1953;19:143-175.
7. Ballard CF. Morphology and treatment of Class II, division 2 occlusions. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1956;32:44-54.
8. Robertson NRE, Hilton R. Feature of the upper central incisors in the Class division 2. Angle Orthod. 1965;35:51-53.
9. Fränkel R. Funktionskieferorthopädie und Mundvorhof als apparative Basis. Berlin: Volk und Gesundheit; 1967.
10. Karlsen AT. Craniofacial characteristics in children with Angle Class division 2 malocclusiori combined with extreme deep bite. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:123-130.
11. Van der Linden F. Probleme und Vorgänge in der Kieferorthopädie. Berlin: Quintessenz; 1991.
12. Fränkel R. Die Bedeutung der Weichteile für die Induktion und Formorientierung des Kieferwachstums unter Zugrundelegung der Behandlungsergebnisse mit Funktionsreglern. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1964;25:413-432.
13. Nicol WA. The lower lip and the upper incisor teeth in Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion. Dent Pract. 1963;14:179-182.
14. Nicol WA. The lower lip and the upper teeth in Angle's Class II, division 2 malocclusion. Dent Pract. 1964;14:179-182.
15. Posen AL. The influence of maximum perioral and tongue force on the incisor teeth. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:285-309.
16. Mills JR. The problem of overbite in Class II, division 2 malocclusion. Brit J Orthod. 1973;1:34-48.
17. Fletcher GGT. The retroclined upper incisor. Brit J Orthod. 1975; 2:207-216.
18. Luffingham JK. The lower lip and the maxillary central incisors. Eur J Orthod. 1982;4:263-268.
19. Van der Linden F, Boersma H. Diagnose und Behandlungsplanung in der Kieferorthopädie. Band 3. Berlin: Quintesszenz Verlag; 1988.
20. Obijou C, Pancherz H. Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997; 112:287-291.
21. Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. New York: Interscience; 1940.
22. Van der Linden F. Development of the Dentition. Chicago: Quintessence; 1983.
23. Van der Linden F. Facial Growth and Facial Orthopedics. Chicago: Quintessence; 1986.
24. Selwyn-Barnett BJ. Rationale of treatment for Class II division 2 malocclusion. Brit J Orthod. 1991;18:173-181.
25. Fuhrmann R. Kieferorthopädische Behandlung der Klasse II, 2 Malokklusion. Nachuntersuchung von 17 Patienten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Unterlippenhöhe und der Bißhebung. Homburg/Saar, Germany: Med Diss; 1989.
26. Simons ME, Joondeph DR. Change in overbite: a ten-year postretention study. Am J Orthod. 1973;64:349-367.
27. Binda SKR, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Maertens JKM, vant Hoff MA. A long-term cephalo-metric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:301-308.
28. Vig PS, Cohen AM. Vertical growth of the lips: a serial cephalometric study. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:405-415.
29. Lagerström L. Tiefbißkorrektur in Angle Klasse II, 2 Okklusionsanomalien. Kieferorthopädie, Konzepte und Perspektiven. München. Germany: ZMS-Verlag; 1980:129-136.
30. Berg R. Stability of deep overbite correction. Eur J Orthod. 1983; 5:75-83.
31. Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by bite jumping with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979;76:423-442.
32. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. Swed Dent J. 1982b;15(suppl):189-196.
33. Schudy FF. The control of vertical overbite in clinical orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 1968;38:19-39.
34. Houston WJB. Incisor edge-centroid relationships and overbite depth. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:139-143.
35. Selwyn-Barnett BJ. Class II, division 2 malocclusion: a method of planning and treatment. Brit J Orthod. 1996;23:29-36.
36. Pancherz H. The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1981;3:49-60.