Survival of glass fiber post restorations over 5 years

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 267-272

  Naumann, Michael ^a   Reich, Sven ^a   Nothdurft, Frank P ^b   Beuer, Florian ^c   Schirrmeister, Jörg F ^d   Dietrich, Thomas ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^e BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SURVIVAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC;

EID: 52049126194     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Allen EP, Bayne SC, Brodine AH, Cronin RJ, Jr., Donovan TE, Kois JC, Summitt JB. Annual review of selected dental literature: Report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 60-88.
2. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years. An observational clinical study. J Dent 2005;33:305-312.
3. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kiessling S, Dietrich T. Risk factors for failure of glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: A prospective observational clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:519-524.
4. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: A 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:593-596.
5. Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:173-178.
6. Tjan AHL, Tjan AH, Sun JC. Retention of Luminex post system. Oral Health 1997;87:31-35.
7. Hugoson A, Ekfeldt A, Koch G, Hallonsten AL. Incisal and occlusal tooth wear in children and adolescents in a Swedish population. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54:263-270.
8. Lin D, Wei L. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazard model. JASA 1989;84:1074-1078.
9. Naumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts. Dent Mater 2007;23:138-144.
10. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529-536.
11. Morgano SM, Brackett SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: Current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:643-657.
12. Gegauff AG. Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post-cores and crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:169-179.
13. Nicholls JI. The dental ferrule and the endodontically compromised tooth. Quintessence Int 2001;32:171-173.
14. Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: A literature review, Int Endod J 2002:35:575-581.
15. Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:368-373.
16. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-157.
17. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B-18B.
18. Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts. A prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66:613-618.
19. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:9B-13B.
20. King PA, Setchell DJ, Rees JS. Clinical evaluation of a carbon fibre reinforced carbon endodontic post. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:785-789.
21. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:39-44.
22. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TR. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:297-301.
23. Mannocci F, Qualtrough AJ, Worthington HV, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: Five-year results. Oper Dent 2005;30:9-15.
24. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, M. DS, Goracci C. Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res 2007;86:729-734.
25. Cagidiaco MC, Radovic I, Simonetti M, Tay F, Ferrari M. Clinical performance of fiber post restorations in endodontically treated teeth: 2-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:293-298.
26. Caplan DJ, Kolker J, Rivera EM, Walton RE. Relationship between number of proximal contacts and survival of root canal treated teeth. Int Endod J 2002;35:193-199.
27. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:10-15.
28. Iqbal MK, Johansson AA, Akeel RF, Bergenholtz A, Omar R. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with the periapical status of restored, endodontically treated teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:31-38.
29. Hatzikyriakos AH, Reisis GI, Tsingos N. A 3-year postoperative clinical evaluation of posts and cores beneath existing crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:454-458.
30. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51:780-784.
31. Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87: 256-263.
32. Decock V, De Nayer K, De Boever JA, Dent M. 18-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:331-340.
33. Eliasson S, Bergstrom J, Sanda A. Periodontal bone loss of teeth with metal posts. A radiographic study. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:850-853.
34. Eckerbom M, Magnusson T, Martinsson T. Prevalence of apical periodontitis, crowned teeth and teeth with posts in a Swedish population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;7:214-220.
35. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:34-39.
36. Balkenhol M, Wostmann B, Rein C, Ferger P. Survival time of cast post and cores: A 10-year retrospective study. J Dent 2007;35:50-58.
37. Salvi GE, Siegrist Guldener BE, Amstad T, Joss A, Lang NP. Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post-and-core systems in a specialist practice setting. Int Endod J 2007;40:209-215.
38. Jung RE, Kalkstein O, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle CH. A comparison of composite post buildups and cast gold post-and-core buildups for the restoration of nonvital teeth after 5 to 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20:63-69.
39. Naumann M, Sterzenbac G, Alexandra F, Dietrich T. Randomized controlled clinical pilot trial of titanium vs. glass fiber prefabricated posts: Preliminary results after up to 3 years, Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:499-503.
40. Caplan DJ, Cai J, Yin G, White BA. Root canal filled versus non-root canal filled teeth: A retrospective comparison of survival times. J Public Health Dent 2005;65:90-96.
41. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:135-141.
42. Eckerbom M, Magnusson T, Martinsson T. Reasons for and incidence of tooth mortality in a Swedish population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8:230-234.
43. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-444.
44. Mentink AG, Meeuwissen R, Kayser AF, Mulder J. Survival rate and failure characteristics of the al 1 metal post and core restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:455-461.
45. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:369-376.
46. Kolker JL, Damiano PC, Jones MP, Dawson DV, Caplan DJ, Armstrong SR, Flach SD, Kuthy RA, Warren JJ. The timing of subsequent treatment for teeth restored with large amalgams and crowns: Factors related to the need for subsequent treatment. J Dent Res 2004;83:854-858.
47. Caplan DJ, Weintraub JA. Factors related to loss of root canal filled teeth. J Public Health Dent 1997;57:31-39.
48. Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004;20:29-36.