Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 297-301

  Mannocci, Francesco ^a,c   Bertelli, Egidio ^a   Sherriff, Martyn ^b   Watson, Timothy F ^b   Ford, T R Pitt ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c Department of Conservative Dentistry ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; METAL; ALLOY; RESIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CERAMICS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MAXILLA; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TECHNIQUE; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT FAILURE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; MIDDLE AGED; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH, NONVITAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036728316     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128492     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:11-6.
2. Walton TR. A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metal-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:519-26.
3. Preston JD. Rational approach to tooth preparation for ceramo-metal restorations. Dent Clin North Am 1977;21:683-98.
4. Sozio RB. The marginal aspect of the ceramo-metal restoration: the collarless ceramo-metal restoration. Dent Clin North Am 1977;21:787-801.
5. Barkhordar RA, Radke R, Abbasi J. Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:676-8.
6. Hemmings KW, King PA, Setchell DJ. Resistance to torsional forces of various post and core designs. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:325-9.
7. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28-35.
8. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:780-4.
9. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-44.
10. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study on 236 subjects with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-7.
11. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:9B-13B.
12. Lovdahl PE, Nicholls JI. Pin retained amalgam cores vs. cast-gold dowel-cores. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:507-14.
13. Trabert KC, Caput AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture - a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978;4:341-5.
14. Sorensen JA. Preservation of tooth structure. J Calif Dent Assoc 1988;16: 15-22.
15. Rud J, Omnell KA. Root fractures due to corrosion. Diagnostic aspects. Scand J Dent Res 1970;78:397-403.
16. Tamse A, Fuss Z, Lustig J, Kaplavi J. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertically fractured teeth. J Endod 1999;25:506-8.
17. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with enamel-bonded resin. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:218-25.
18. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. 1. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533-51.
19. Mannocci F, Ferrari M. Apical seal of roots obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha, epoxy resin cement, and dentin bonding agent. J Endod 1998;24:41-4.
20. Walton TR. A ten-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics:1. Protocol and patient profile. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:325-31.
21. van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlen M. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1999;78:1319-25.
22. van Dijken JW. Direct composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
23. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28: 375-82.
24. Kohler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2000;28:111-6.
25. Gardener MJ, Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, editors. Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. 1st ed. London: British Medical Journal; 1990. p. 222-9.
26. Berger RL, Boos DD. P values maximized over a confidence set for the nuisance parameter. J Am Stat Assoc 1994;89:1012-6.
27. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten-Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:605-11.