A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 369-376

  Torbjörner, Annika ^a,b   Fransson, Bo ^a  

^a UDDEVALLA HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b Oral Protetik   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENT;

BIOMECHANICS; DENTITION; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; STRESS FRACTURE; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; CEMENTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 18744427214     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion. J Oral Rehabil 1986;13:423-432.
2. Landolt A, Lang NP. Erfolg und Misserfolg bei Extensionsbrücken. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1988;98:239-244.
3. René N, Öwall B, Cronström R. Dental claims in the Swedish patient insurance scheme. Int Dent J 1991;41:157-163.
4. Sundh B, Ödman P. A study of fixed prosthodontics performed at a university clinic 18 years after insertion. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:513-519.
5. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjögren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:10-15.
6. Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Ödman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-444.
7. Turner CH. Post-retained crown failure: A survey. Dent Update 1982;9:221-229.
8. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28-35.
9. Torbjörner A, Fransson B. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:131-145.
10. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989;68:1540-1544.
11. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:108-111.
12. Trabert KC, Caputo AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture - A comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978;4:341-345.
13. Leary JM, Aquilino SA, Svare CW. An evaluation of post length within the elastic limits of dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:277-281.
14. Sorensen JA. Preservation of tooth structure. J Calif Dent Assoc 1988;16:15-22.
15. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: A review. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:355-363.
16. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40.
17. Beyron H. Occlusion: Point of significance in planning restorative procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:641-652.
18. Nyman S, Lindhe J, Lundgren D. The role of occlusion for the stability of fixed bridges in patients with reduced periodontal tissue support. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:53-66.
19. Nyman S, Lindhe J. Considerations on the design of occlusion in prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:1-15.
20. Nyman SR, Lang NP. Tooth mobility and the biological rationale for splinting teeth. Periodontol 2000 1994;4:15-22.
21. Lundgren D, Laurell L. Biomechanical aspects of fixed bridgework supported by natural teeth and endosseous implants. Periodontol 2000 1994;4:23-40.
22. Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:558-567.
23. Ellner S, Bergendal T, Bergman B. Four post-and-core combinations as abutments for fixed single crowns: A prospective up to 10-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:249-254.
24. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast posts and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B-18B.
25. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:9B-13B.
26. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-157.
27. Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts - A prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66:613-618.
28. Hatzikyriakos AH, Reisis GI, Tsingos N. A 3-year postoperative clinical evaluation of posts and cores beneath existing crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:454-458.
29. Lindé LÅ. The use of composites as core material in root-filled teeth. II. Clinical investigation. Swed Dent J 1984;8:209-216.
30. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:39-44.
31. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TRP. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:297-301.
32. Mentink AGB, Meeuwissen R, Käyser AF, Mulder J. Survival rate and failure characteristics of the all metal post and core restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:455-461.
33. Mentink AGB, Creugers NHJ, Meeuwissen R, Leempoel PJB, Käyser AF. Clinical performance of different post and core systems - Results from a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:577-584.
34. Roberts DH. The failure of retainers in bridge prostheses. Br Dent J 1970;128:117-124.
35. Valderhaug J, Jokstad A, Ambjørnsen E, Norheim PW. Assessment of the periapical and clinical status of crowned teeth over 25 years. J Dent 1997;25:97-105.
36. Weine FS, Wax AH, Wenckus CS. Retrospective study of tapered, smooth post systems in place for 10 years or more. J Endod 1991;17:293-297.
37. Creugers NHJ, Mentink AGB, Käyser AF. An analysis of durability data on post and core restorations. J Dent 1993;21:281-284.
38. Hoag EP, Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:177-181.
39. Gelfand M, Goldman M, Sunderman EJ. Effect of complete veneer crowns on the compressive strength of endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:635-638.
40. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:39-44.
41. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:565-567.
42. Barkhordar RA, Radke R, Abbasi J. Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:676-678.
43. Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:78-82.
44. Milot P, Stein RS. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:428-435.
45. Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: A mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:442-448.
46. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:155-161.
47. Hemmings KW, King PA, Setchell DJ. Resistance to torsional forces of various post and core designs. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:325-329.
48. Purton DG, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of carbon fibre versus stainless steel root canal posts. Int Endod J 1996;29:262-265.
49. Drurnmond JL. In vitro evaluation of endodontic posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:5B-8B.
50. Purton DG, Payne JA. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts. Quintessence Int 1996;27:93-97.
51. Love RM, Purton DG. The effect of serrations on carbon fiber posts-Retention within the root canal, core retention, and post rigidity. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:484-488.
52. De Santis R, Prisco D, Apicella A, Ambrosio L, Rengo S, Nicolais L. Carbon fiber post adhesion to resin luting cement in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000;11:201-206.
53. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-278.
54. Drummond JL, Toepke TRS, King TJ. Thermal and cyclic loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:220-224.
55. Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten-Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:605-611.
56. Mallick PK. Fiber-Reinforced Composites. New York: Dekker, 1993.
57. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific, 1998.
58. Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental Materials, ed 11. St Louis: Mosby, 2002.
59. Lambjerg-Hansen H, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:882-887.
60. Ukon S, Moroi H, Okimoto K, et al. Influence of different elastic moduli of dowel and core on stress distribution in root. Dent Mater J 2000;19:50-64.
61. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:153-158.
62. Standlee J, Caputo A. Biomechanics. J Calif Dent Assoc 1988;16:49-58.
63. Freeman MA, Nicholls JI, Kydd WL, Harrington GW. Leakage associated with load fatigue-induced preliminary failure of full crowns placed over three different post and core systems. J Endod 1998;24:26-32.
64. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva LD, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-532.
65. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchel DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:5-9.
66. Akkayan B, Gölmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-437.
67. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:262-269.
68. Morgano SM, Bracket SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: Current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999;84:643-657.
69. Rosentritt M, Fürer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:595-601.
70. Jokstad A, Mjör IA. Ten years' evaluation of three luting cements. J Dent 1996;24:309-315.
71. Assif D, Ferber A. Retention of dowels using a composite resin as a cementing medium. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:292-296.
72. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Salama M. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:116-121.
73. Chan FW, Harcourt JK, Brockhurst PJ. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements. Aust Dent J 1993;38:39-45.
74. Junge T, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WK. Load fatigue of compromised teeth: A comparison of three luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:558-564.
75. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996;27:483-491.
76. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:10-15.
77. Sano H, Kanemura N, Burrow MF, Inai N, Yamada T, Tagami J. Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: Students vs dentists. Dent Mater J 1998;17:51-58.
78. Øilo G, Jørgensen KD. The influence of surface roughness on the retentive ability of two dental luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:377-389.
79. Tjan HL, Whang SB, Miller GD. The effect of a corrugated channel on the retentive properties of an obturator-reinforced composite resin dowel-core system. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:347-352.
80. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Platzer U, McMullan-Vogel CG. Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapered posts. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:451-457.
81. Ruemping DR, Lund MR, Schnell RJ. Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsional forces. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:159-162.
82. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length, diameter and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:401-405.
83. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Holcomb J, Trabert KC. The retentive and stress-distributing properties of a threaded endodontic dowel. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:398-404.
84. Zmener O. Adaptation of threaded dowels to dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:530-535.
85. Johnson JK, Sakumura JS. Dowel form and tensile force. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:645-649.
86. Purton DG, Love RM, Chandler NP. Rigidity and retention of ceramic root canal posts. Oper Dent 2000;25:223-227.
87. Maniatopoulos C, Pilliar RM, Smith DC. Evaluation of strength at the cement-endodontic post interface. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:662-669.
88. Meyenberg KH, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Zirconia posts: A new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent 1995;7:73-80.
89. Koutayas SO, Kern M. All-ceramic posts and cores: The state of the art. Quintessence Int 1999;30:383-392.
90. Hedlund SO, Johansson NG, Sjögren G. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro. Br Dent J 2003;195:155-158.
91. Reagan SE, Fruits TJ, van Brunt CL, Ward CK. Effects of cyclic loading on selected post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int 1999;30:61-70.
92. Pilo R, Cardash HS, Levin E, Assif D. Effect of core stiffness on the in vitro fracture of crowned, endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:302-306.
93. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:584-590.
94. Millstein PL, Nathanson D, Ho J. Retention between a serrated steel dowel and different core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:480-482.
95. Gateau P, Sabek M, Dailey B. Fatigue testing and microscopic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:341-347.
96. Eckerbom M, Magnusson T, Martinsson T. Prevalence of apical periodontitis, crowned teeth and teeth with posts in a Swedish population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;7:214-220.
97. Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering JD. In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1990;16:566-569.
98. Magura ME, Kafrawy AH, Brown CE Jr, Newton CW. Human saliva coronal microleakage in obturated root canals: An in vitro study. J Endod 1991;17:324-331.
99. Khayat A, Lee SJ, Torabinejad M. Human saliva penetration of coronally unsealed obturated root canals. J Endod 1993;19:458-461.
100. Metzger Z, Abramovitz R, Abramovitz L, Tagger M. Correlation between remaining length of root canal fillings after immediate post space preparation and coronal leakage. J Endod 2000;26:724-728.
101. DeCleen MJ. The relationship between the root canal filling and post space preparation. Int Endod J 1993;26:53-58.
102. Heling I, Gorfil C, Slutzky H, Kopolovic K, Zalkind M, Slutzky-Goldberg I. Endodontic failure caused by inadequate restorative procedures: Review and treatment recommendations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:674-678.
103. Fan B, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Coronal leakage along apical root fillings after immediate and delayed post space preparation. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999;15:124-126.