Risk factors for failure of glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: A prospective observational clinical study

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 519-524

  Naumann, Michael ^a   Blankenstein, Felix ^a   Kießling, Saskia ^a   Dietrich, Thomas ^b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Fiber reinforced composite post; Multivariate analysis; Postendodontic reconstruction; Survival analysis

Indexed keywords

GLASS; GLASS FIBER; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 28944444274     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00257.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ALLEN EP, BAYNE SC, BRODINE AH, CRONIN RJ JR, DONOVAN TE, KOIS JC, SUMMITT JB. Annual review of selected dental literature: report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 60-88.
2. CAPLAN DJ, KOLKER J, RIVERA EM, WALTON RE. Relationship between number of proximal contacts and survival of root canal treated teeth. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 193-199.
3. BERGMAN B, LUNDQUIST P, SJOGREN U, SUNDQUIST G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 10-15.
4. IQBAL MK, JOHANSSON AA, AKEEL RF, BERGENHOLTZ A, OMAR R. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with the periapical status of restored, endodontically treated teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 31-38.
5. HATZIKYRIAKOS AH, REISIS GI, TSINGOS N. A 3-year postoperative clinical evaluation of posts and cores beneath existing crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 454-458.
6. SORENSEN JA, MARTINOFF JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 780-784.
7. AQUILINO SA, CAPLAN DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 256-263.
8. MANNOCCI F, BERTELLI E, SHERRIFF M, WATSON TF, FORD TR. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 297-301.
9. DECOCK V, DE NAYER K, DE BOEVER JA, DENT M. 18-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 331-340.
10. ELIASSON S, BERGSTROM J, SANDA A. Periodontal bone loss of teeth with metal posts. A radiographic study. J Clin Periodontol 1995; 22: 850-853.
11. ECKERBOM M, MAGNUSSON T, MARTINSSON T. Prevalence of apical periodontitis, crowned teeth and teeth with posts in a Swedish population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991; 7: 214-220.
12. HELFER AR, MELNICK S, SCHILDER H. Determination of the moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 34: 661-670.
13. PAPA J, CAIN C, MESSER HH. Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994; 10: 91-93.
14. SEDGLEY CM, MESSER HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992; 18: 332-335.
15. STRUB JR, PONTIUS O, KOUTAYAS S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 120-124.
16. TROPE M, MALTZ DO, TRONSTAD L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1: 108-111.
17. HOWE CA, MCKENDRY DJ. Effect of endodontic access preparation on resistance to crown-root fracture. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121: 712-715.
18. PANITVISAI P, MESSER HH. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1995; 21: 57-61.
19. FERNANDES AS, DESSAI GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 355-363.
20. FREDRIKSSON M, ASTBACK J, PAMENIUS M, ARVIDSON K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 151-157.
21. FERRARI M, VICHI A, GARCIA-GODOY F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 15B-18B.
22. GLAZER B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts - a prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66: 613-618.
23. FERRARI M, VICHI A, MANNOCCI F, MASON PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 9B-13B.
24. KING PA, SETCHELL DJ, REES JS. Clinical evaluation of a carbon fibre reinforced carbon endodontic post. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 785-789.
25. MALFERRARI S, MONACO C, SCOTTI R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 39-44.
26. NAUMANN M, BLANKENSTEIN F, DIETRICH T. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years - an observational clinical study. J Dent 2005; 33: 305-312.
27. LINDHE J, ERICSSON I. The effect of elimination of jiggling forces on periodontally exposed teeth in the dog. J Periodontol 1982; 53: 562-567.
28. TJAN AHL, TJAN AH, SUN JC. Retention of Luminex post system. Oral Health 1997; 87: 31-35.
29. Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology on quality guidelines for endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 1994; 27: 115-124.
30. HUGOSON A, EKFELDT A, KOCH G, HALLONSTEN AL. Incisal and occlusal tooth wear in children and adolescents in a Swedish population. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54: 263-270.
31. LIN D, WEI L. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazard model. JASA 1989; 84: 1074-1078.
32. ASMUSSEN E, PEUTZFELDT A, HEITMANN T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-278.
33. BAE JM, KIM KN, HATTORI M, HASEGAWA K, YOSHINARI M, KAWADA E, ODA Y. The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 33-39.
34. BATEMAN G, RICKETTS DN, SAUNDERS WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Br Dent J 2003; 195: 43-48.
35. CORMIER CJ, BURNS DR, MOON P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001; 10: 26-36.
36. NEWMAN MP, YAMAN P, DENNISON J, RAFTER M, BILLY E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 360-367.
37. CAPLAN DJ, CAI J, YIN G, WHITE BA. Root canal filled versus non-root canal filled teeth: a retrospective comparison of survival times. J Public Health Dent 2005; 65: 90-96.
38. TORBJORNER A, FRANSSON B. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 135-141.
39. ECKERBOM M, MAGNUSSON T, MARTINSSON T. Reasons for and incidence of tooth mortality in a Swedish population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8: 230-234.
40. TORBJORNER A, KARLSSON S, ODMAN PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthel Dent 1995; 73: 439-444.
41. MENTINK AG, MEEUWISSEN R, KAYSER AF, MULDER J. Survival rate and failure characteristics of the all metal post and core restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 455-461.
42. TORBJORNER A, FRANSSON B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 369-376.
43. CAPLAN DJ, WEINTRAUB JA. Factors related to loss of root canal filled teeth. J Public Health Dent 1997; 57: 31-39.
44. KOLKER JL, DAMIANO PC, JONES MP, DAWSON DV, CAPLAN DJ, ARMSTRONG SR, FLACH SD, KUTHY RA, WARREN JJ. The timing of subsequent treatment for teeth restored with large amalgams and crowns: factors related to the need for subsequent treatment. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 854-858.
45. SORENSEN JA, ENGELMAN MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 529-536.
46. MORGANO SM, BRACKETT SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthel Dent 1999; 82: 643-657.
47. GEGAUFF AG. Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post-cores and crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 169-179.
48. NICHOLLS JI. The dental ferrule and the endodontically compromised tooth. Quintessence Int 2001; 32: 171-173.
49. STANKIEWICZ NR, WILSON PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 575-581.
50. ZHI-YUE L, YU-XING Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 368-373.
51. ISIDOR F, BRONDUM K, RAVNHOLT G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 78-82.