Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: A randomized clinical trial

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 173-178

  Schmitter, Marc ^a   Rammelsberg, Peter ^a   Gabbert, Olaf ^a   Ohlmann, Brigitte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS; GLASS FIBER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH ROOT;

CROWNS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, REMOVABLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 34047203985     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301.
2. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:360-367.
3. Purton DG, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of carbon fibre versus stainless steel root canal posts. Int Endod J 1996; 29:262-265.
4. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:400-405.
5. King PA, Setchell DJ, Rees JS. Clinical evaluation of a carbon fibre reinforced carbon endodontic post. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:785-789.
6. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:9B-13B.
7. Torbjomer A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-444.
8. Weine FS, Wax AH, Wenckus CS. Retrospective study of tapered, smooth post systems in place for 10 years or more. J Endod 1991;17:293-297.
9. Iqbal MK, Johansson AA, Akeel RF, Bergenholtz A, Omar R. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with the periapical status of restored, endodontically treated teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:31-38.
10. Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts - A prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66:613-618.
11. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kiessling S, Dietrich T. Risk factors for failure of glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: A prospective observational clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:519-524.
12. Fox K, Wood DJ, Youngson CC. A clinical report of 85 fractures of metallic post-retained crowns. Int Endod J 2004;37:561-573.
13. Napankangas R, Salonen MA, Raustia AM. Influence of previous restoration of the tooth on prognosis of crowns with dowels. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:1042-1046.
14. Albuquerque Rde C, Polleto LT, Fontana RH, Cimini CA. Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:936-943.
15. Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater 2005;21:709-715.
16. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years: An observational clinical study. J Dent 2005;33:305-312. Epub 2004 Dec 10.
17. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: A 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:593-596.
18. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B-18B.
19. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28-35.
20. Martinez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-532.
21. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001;10:26-36.
22. Naumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts. Dent Mater 2006 Feb 4; [Epub ahead of print].
23. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-157.
24. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:39-44.