Harnessing the power of emergent interdependence to promote diverse team collaboration

Research on Managing Groups and Teams

Volumn 11, Issue , 2008, Pages 245-266

  Caruso, Heather M ^a   Woolley, Anita Williams ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49849105832     PISSN: 15340856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1534-0856(08)11011-8     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Brehmer B. Social judgment theory and the analysis of interpersonal conflict. Psychological Bulletin 83 6 (1976) 985-1003
2. Caruso, H. M. (2008). Interdependence vs. Identity: The interaction of perceived interdependence and occupational identities in shaping the dynamics of cross-functional teams. Unpublished manuscript.
3. Cronin M.A., and Weingart L.R. Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review 32 3 (2007) 761-773
4. Dahlin K.B., Weingart L.R., and Hinds P.J. Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal 48 6 (2005) 1107-1123
5. Damon W. Problems of direction in socially shared cognition. In: Resnick L.B., Levine J.M., and Teasley S.D. (Eds). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (1991), APA Books, Washington, DC
6. Dearborn D.C., and Simon H.A. Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry 21 (1958) 140-144
7. Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science 3 2 (1992) 179-202
8. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 2 (1999) 350-383
9. Edmondson A., and Woolley A. Understanding outcomes of organizational learning interventions. In: Easterby-Smith M., and Lyles M. (Eds). International handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (2003), Blackwell, London 185-211
10. Ericksen J., and Dyer L. Right from the start: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 49 3 (2004) 438-471
11. Fiore, S. M. (2001). Problem space and problem solving failure: Cognitive mechanisms in the explanation of process loss in group problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
12. Fleck L. Genesis and development of a scientific fact (1979), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
13. Franz R.S. Task interdependence and personal power in teams. Small Group Research 29 (1998) 226-253
14. Gauthier I., and Tarr M.J. Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research 37 12 (1997) 1673-1682
15. Glick W.H., Miller C.C., and Huber G.P. The impact of upper echelon diversity on organizational performance. In: Huber G.P., and Glick W.H. (Eds). Organizational change and redesign (1993), Oxford University Press, New York 176-224
16. Guzzo R.A., and Dickson M.W. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology 47 (1996) 307-338
17. Hackman J.R. Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances (2002), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
18. Hackman J.R., and O'Connor M. What makes for a great analytic team? Individual vs. team approaches to intelligence analysis (2004), Intelligence Science Board, Office of the Director of Central Intelligence, Washington, DC
19. Hackman J.R., and Wageman R. A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review 30 (2005) 269-287
20. Hammond K.R., Todd F.J., and Wilkins M. Cognitive conflict between persons: Application of the "Lens Model" paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2 4 (1966) 343-360
21. Harrison D.A., Price K.H., and Bell M.P. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal 41 1 (1998) 96-107
22. Hoffman L.R. Homogeneity of member personality and its effect on group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58 1 (1959) 27-32
23. Hoffman L.R., Harburg E., and Maier N.R.F. Differences and disagreement as factors in creative group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 64 3 (1962) 206-214
24. Hoffman L.R., and Maier N.R.F. Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62 (1961) 401-407
25. Hollingshead A.B. Perceptions of expertise and transactive memory in work relationships. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 3 3 (2000) 257-267
26. Jehn K.A., Northcraft G.B., and Neale M.A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 4 (1999) 741-763
27. Johnson D.W. Communication in conflict situations: A critical review of the research. International Journal of Group Tensions 3 (1973) 46-67
28. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research (1989), Interaction Book Co, Edina, Minn.
29. Kozhevnikov M., Kosslyn S.M., and Shephard J. Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory and Cognition 33 (2005) 710-726
30. Lawrence P.R., and Lorsch J.W. Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Rev. ed. (1986), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
31. Levine J.M., Resnick L.B., and Higgins E.T. Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 44 (1993) 585-612
32. Lindsley D.H., Brass D.J., and Thomas J.B. Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. The Academy of Management Review 20 3 (1995) 645-678
33. Mannix E., and Neale M.A. What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 6 2 (2005) 31-55
34. Markóczy L. Measuring beliefs: Accept no substitutes. Academy of Management Journal 40 5 (1997) 1228
35. Mayer R.C., Davis J.H., and Schoorman F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review 20 3 (1995) 709-734
36. Miller C.C., Burke L.M., and Glick W.H. Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal 19 1 (1998) 39
37. Miller L.K., and Hamblin R.L. Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. American Sociological Review 28 5 (1963) 768-778
38. Milliken F.J., and Martins L.L. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 21 2 (1996) 402
39. Moreland R.L., Argote L., and Krishnan R. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In: Nye J.L., and Brower A.M. (Eds). What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (1996), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 57-86
40. Owens D.A., Mannix E.A., and Neale M.A. Strategic formation of groups: Issues in task performance and team member selection. In: Gruenfeld D.H. (Ed). Composition (1998), Elsevier Science/JAI Press, US 149-165 xi, 272
41. Pelled L.H., Eisenhardt K.M., and Xin K.R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 1 (1999) 1-28
42. Perlow L.A., Gittell J.H., and Katz N. Contextualizing patterns of work group interaction: Toward a nested theory of structuration. Organization Science 15 5 (2004) 520-536
43. Phillips K.W., and Loyd D.L. When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99 2 (2006) 143-160
44. Phillips K.W., Northcraft G.B., and Neale M.A. Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help?. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 9 4 (2006) 467-482
45. Polzer J.T., Milton L.P., and Swann Jr. W.B. Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly 47 2 (2002) 296-324
46. Poole M.S., and DeSanctis G. Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making. Human Communication Research 19 (1992) 5-49
47. Quinn R.W. Flow in knowledge work: High performance experience in the design of national security technology. Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (2005) 610-641
48. Stewart G.L., and Barrick M.R. Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal 43 (2000) 135-148
49. Tamir M., Robinson M.D., Clore G.L., Martin L.L., and Whitaker D.J. Are we puppets on a string? The contextual meaning of unconscious expressive cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 2 (2004) 237-249
50. Thompson J.D. Organizations in action (1967), McGraw-Hill, New York
51. Triandis H.C., Hall E.R., and Ewen R.B. Member heterogeneity and dyadic creativity. Human Relations 18 1 (1965) 33-55
52. van der Vegt G., Emans B., and van de Vliert E. Effects of interdependencies in project teams. Journal of Social Psychology 139 (1999) 202-214
53. Wageman R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1995) 145-180
54. Wageman R. How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science 12 5 (2001) 559
55. Wageman R. The meaning of interdependence. In: Turner M.E. (Ed). Groups at work: Theory and research (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 197-218
56. Wageman R., and Baker G. Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 18 2 (1997) 139-158
57. Wageman R., and Gordon F.M. As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. Organization Science 16 6 (2005) 687-700
58. Walsh J.P. Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers' belief structures and information processing. Academy of Management Journal 31 4 (1988) 873-896
59. Williams K.Y., and O'Reilly C.A. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior 20 (1998) 77-140
60. Woolley, A. W. (in press). Means versus ends: Implications of outcome and process focus for team adaptation and performance. Organization Science.
61. Woolley A.W., Gerbasi M.E., Chabris C.F., Kosslyn S.M., and Hackman J.R. Bringing in the experts: How team composition and collaborative planning jointly shape analytic effectiveness. Small Group Research 31 39 (2008) 352-371
62. Woolley A.W., Hackman J.R., Jerde T.J., Chabris C.F., Bennett S.L., and Kosslyn S.M. Using brain-based measures to compose teams: How individual capabilities and team collaboration strategies jointly shape performance. Social Neuroscience 2 (2007) 96-105