Audience Response Systems: Technology to Engage Learners

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 993-1000

  Collins, Jannette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Audience response system; interactive lecture techniques

Indexed keywords

AUDIENCE RESPONSE SYSTEM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; HISTORY; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LEARNING; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOFREQUENCY; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 49849102835     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.04.008     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Audience response systems combine advanced keypad technology with cutting-edge software to create interactive environments. http://www.audienceresponseinfo.com/audience-response-systems/ Accessed August 21, 2007
2. Audience response vendors. http://www.audienceresponseinfo.com/audience-response-vendors/ Accessed August 21, 2007
3. Audience response systems: rent vs. buy. http://www.audienceresponseinfo.com/audience-response-systems-rent-vs-buy/ Accessed August 21, 2007
4. Audience response. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audience_response Accessed August 21, 2007
5. Burnstein, and Lederman L.M. The use and evolution of an audience response system. In: Banks D.A. (Ed). Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases (2006), Information Science Publishing, Hershey, Pa 40-52
6. Webking R., and Valenzuela F. Using audience response systems to develop critical thinking skills. In: Banks D.A. (Ed). Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases (2006), Information Science Publishing, Hershey, Pa 127-139
7. Butler J.A. Use of teaching methods within the lecture format. Med Teacher 14 (1992) 11-25
8. Feden P.D. About instruction: powerful new strategies worth knowing. Educ Horiz 73 (1994) 18-24
9. Kraft R.G. Group-inquiry turns passive students active. College Teaching 33 (1985) 149-154
10. Murray H.G. Effective teaching behaviours in the college class. In: Smart J. (Ed). Higher education: handbook of theory and research (1991), Agation, New York 135-172
11. Steinert Y., and Snell L.S. Interactive lecturing: strategies for increasing participation in large group presentations. Med Teacher 21 (1999) 37-42
12. Lowman J. Mastering the techniques of teaching (1984), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif
13. Michaelsen L.K., Watson W., Cragin J.P., and Fink L.D. Team learning: a potential solution to the problems of large classes. Exchange Org Behav Teaching J 7 (1982) 13-21
14. Frederick P. The lively lecture-8 variations. College Teaching 34 (1986) 43-50
15. Foley R., and Smilansky J. Teaching techniques (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
16. Bligh D.A. What's the use of lectures? (2000), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif
17. Frase L.T., Patrick E., and Schumer H. Effect of question position and frequency upon learning from text under different levels of incentive. J Educ Psychol 61 (1970) 52-56
18. Bangert-Downs R.L., Kulik C-L C., Kulik J.A., and Morgan M. The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Rev Educ Res 61 (1991) 213-238
19. Kulhavy R.W. Feedback in written instruction. Rev Educ Res 53 (1977) 211-232
20. Guthrie J.T. Feedback and sentence learning. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 10 (1971) 23-28
21. Kulik J.A., and Kulik C.-L.C. Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Rev Educ Res 58 (1988) 79-97
22. Gagnon R.J., and Thivierge R. Evaluating touch pad technology. J Contin Educ Health Prof 17 (1997) 20-26
23. Nasmith L., and Steinert Y. The evaluation of a workshop to promote interactive learning. Teach Learn Med 13 (2001) 43-48
24. Copeland H.L., Longworth D.L., Hewson M.G., and Stoller J.K. Successful lecturing: a prospective study to validate attributes of the effective medical lecture. J Gen Intern Med 15 (2000) 366-371
25. Schackow T.E., Chavez M., Loya L., and Friedman M. Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents. Fam Med 36 (2004) 496-504
26. Bassignami M.J., Rubio E.I., White M.A., and Brant W.E. The effect of audience-response system on resident learning and retention of lecture material. http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/ade/research/abstracts/2007/abstract-2.doc Accessed January 22, 2008
27. Guthrie R.W., and Carlin A. Waking the dead: using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom. http://www.audienceresponseinfo.com/interactive-technology-classroom/ Accessed August 21, 2007
28. Burnstein R.A., and Lederman L.M. Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. Physics Teacher 39 (2001) 8-11
29. Papp K.K., and Miller F.B. The answer to stimulating lectures is the question. Med Teacher 18 (1996) 147-149
30. Williams J.B. Learning by remote control: exploring the use of an audience response system as a vehicle for content delivery. http://www.audienceresponseinfo.com/learning-by-remote-control/ Accessed August 21, 2007
31. Draper S. Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. http://www.audienceresponseinfo.com/electronically-enhanced-classroom-interaction/ Accessed August 21, 2007
32. McKeachie W. Teaching tips (1994), D.C. Heath, Lexington, Mass
33. Newble D., and Cannon R. A handbook for medical teachers (1994), Kluwer Academic, Boston
34. Silliman SE, McWilliams L. Observations on benefits/limitations of an audience response system. Presented at: 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition; Salt Lake City, Utah; June 2004.
35. Uhari M., Renko M., and Soini H. Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures. BMC Med Educ. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/3/12
36. American Board of Radiology. Diagnostic self-assessment module (SAM) application guidelines. https://www.abronline.org/downloads/Diagnostic%20Radiology%20SAM%20Application.doc Accessed January 20, 2008
37. Hilliard J. Enhancing your presentations with the OptionFinder audience polling system (2002), Option Technologies Interactive, Orlando, Fla
38. Pelton L.F., and Pelton T. Selected and constructed response systems in mathematics classrooms. In: Banks D.A. (Ed). Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases (2006), Information Science Publishing, Hershey, Pa 175-186
39. Horowitz H.M. ARS evolution: reflections and recommendations. In: Banks D.A. (Ed). Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases (2006), Information Science Publishing, Hershey, Pa 53-64
40. Beatty I.D., Leonard W.J., Gerace W.J., and Dufresne R.J. Question driven instruction: teaching science (well) with an audience response system. In: Banks D.A. (Ed). Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases (2006), Information Science Publishing, Hershey, Pa 96-115
41. Cutts Q. Practical lessons from four years of using an ARS in every lecture of a large class. In: Banks D.A. (Ed). Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases (2006), Information Science Publishing, Hershey, Pa 65-79
42. Dominck J., and Bishop A. Instructor mobile audience response system. In: Banks D.A. (Ed). Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases (2006), Information Science Publishing, Hershey, Pa 347-358
43. Jones M., Marsden G., and Gruijters D. Using mobile phones and PDAs in ad hoc audience response systems. In: Banks D.A. (Ed). Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases (2006), Information Science Publishing, Hershey, Pa 359-372
44. Streeter J.L., and Rybicki F.J. Education techniques for lifelong learning: a novel standard-compliant audience response system for medical education. RadioGraphics 26 (2006) 1243-1249