The use and evolution of an audience response system

Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 40-52

  Burnstein, Ray A ^a   Lederman, Leon M ^a,b  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49849106403     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-947-2.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Achacoso, P., & Williams, C. (2003, Spring). Writing effective multiple choice tests. University of Texas Learning Center. Retrieved June 2, 2005, from www.utexas.edu/academic/cte/efs2003/achascoso/achacoso.ppt
2. Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Beichner, R.(2000). Student-centered activities for large enrollment university physics (SCALE-UP). Proceedings of the Sigma Xi Forum, Reshaping Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education: Tools for Better Learning. Minneapolis, MN.
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2), 139.
5. Bloom, S. J., (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, Cognitive domain. New York; Toronto: Longmans, Green.
6. Burnstein, R. A., & Lederman, L. M. (1996). Report on progress in using a wireless keypad response system: The changing role of physics departments in modern universities. Proceedings of the ICUPE. College Park, MD.
7. Burnstein, R. A., & Lederman, L. M. (2000). AAPT Announcer, 30, 85.
8. Burnstein, R. A., & Lederman, L. M. (2001). Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. Phys. Teach., 39, 8-11.
9. Burnstein, R. A., & Lederman, L. M. (2003). Comparison of different commercial keypad systems. Phys. Teach, 41, 272-275.
10. Burton, S. J., Sudweeks, R. R., Merill, P. M., & Wood, B. (1991). How to prepare better multiple-choice test-items: Guidelines for university faculty. Brigham Young University Testing Services and the Department of Instructional Science.
11. Cox, A. J., & Junkin, W. F., III. (2002). Enhanced student learning in the introductory physics laboratory. Physics Education, 37(1), 37-44.
12. Dufresne, R. J., & Gerace, W. J. (2004). Assessing to learn: Formative assessment in physics instruction. Phys. Teach. 42, 428.
13. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., & Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 3-47.
14. Erlich, R. (2005). Classroom response systems, the good, bad and the ugly. AAPT Announcer, 24, 84.
15. Frary, (1995). More multiple-choice item writing do's and don'ts. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 4, 11.
16. Fuller, R. G., (1994, Spring). Using interactive lecture methods to teach physics. American Physical Society Form on Education.
17. Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student study. Am. J. Phys., 66, 64-74.
18. Hestenes, D., &. Wells, H. (1992). A mechanics baseline test. Phys. Teach., 30, 3.
19. Hestenes, D., Wells, H., & Swackhamer (1992). Force concept inventory. Phys. Teach., 30, 141. and ibid 159.
20. Hewitt, N., & Seymour E. (1991). Factors contributing to high attrition rates among science and engineering undergraduate majors. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Report. University of Colorado.
21. Horowitz, H. M. (1998). Student response systems: Interactivity in a classroom environment. IBM Corporate Education Center.
22. Hudson, H. T. (1985). Teaching physics to a large lecture section. Phys. Teach., 23, 88.
23. Littauer, R. (1972). Instructional implications of a new low-cost electronic student response system. Educ. Tech., p. 69.
24. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual and concept tests. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. McDermott, L.C. (1991). What we teach and what is learned-closing the gap. Am. J. Phys., 59, 301.
26. Meltzer, D. E., & Manivannan, K. (1996). Promoting interactivity in physics lecture classes. Phys. Teach., 34, 72.
27. Poulis, J., Massen, C., Robens, E., & Gilbert, M. (1998). Physics lecturing with audience paced feedback. Am. J. Phys., 66, 439-442.
28. Sokoloff, D.R. & Thornton, R.K. (1997). Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment. Phys. Teach., 35, 340.
29. Tobias, S. (1992). Revitalizing undergraduate science education: Why some things work and most don't. Research Corporation, Tucson, AZ.
30. Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research based instructional strategies. Am. J. Phys., 59, 10.