Successful lecturing: A prospective study to validate attributes of the effective medical lecture

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 366-371

  Copeland, H Liesel ^a   Longworth, David L ^a   Hewson, Mariana G ^a   Stoller, James K ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Continuing medical education; Evaluation studies; Lecturing; Medical faculty; Reproducibility of results; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH; TEACHING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; HUMANS; INTERNAL MEDICINE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TEACHING;

EID: 0033937740     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.06439.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. 1. Copeland HL, Stoller JK, Hewson MG, Longworth DL. Making the continuing medical education lecture effective. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1998;18:227-34.
2. 2. Brennan RL. Elements of Generalizability Theory. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT Publications; 1992.
3. 3. Saroyan A, Snell LS. Variations in lecturing styles. Higher Educ. 1997;33:85-104.
4. 4. Irby D, DeMers J, Scher M, Matthews D. A model for the improvement of medical faculty lecturing. J Med Educ. 1976;51:403-9.
5. 5. Pritchard RD, Watson MD, Kelly K, Paquin AR. Searching for the ideal: a review of teaching evaluation literature. In: Helping Teachers Teach Well. San Francisco, Calif: The New Lexington Press; 1998:3-42.
6. 6. Gagnon RJ, Thivierge R. Evaluating touch pad technology. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1997;17:20-6.
7. 7. Centra JA. Reflective Faculty Evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1993.
8. 8. Hewson MG. Clinical teaching in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:76-82.
9. 9. Brown G, Bakhtar M, Youngman M. Toward a typology of lecturing styles. Br J Psychol. 1984;54:93-100.