Using asynchronous AV communication tools to increase academic self-efficacy

Computers and Education

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1676-1682

  Girasoli, Anthony J ^a   Hannafin, Robert D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic performance; Academic self efficacy; Asynchronous communication; Scaffolding; Self efficacy; Technology; TELE

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; EDUCATION; STUDENTS;

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE; ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY; ASYNCHRONOUS COMMUNICATION; COMMUNICATION TOOLS; COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS; ENHANCED LEARNING; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; INSTRUCTIONAL CONTENT; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; NEW YORK; SCAFFOLDING; SELF-EFFICACY; STUDENT LEARNING; TECHNOLOGY; TELE;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 49449114337     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aleven V., Stahl E., Schworm S., Fishcer F., and Wallace R. Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research 73 3 (2003) 277-320
2. An Y., and Frick T. Student perceptions of asynchronous computer-mediated communication in face-to-face courses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 2 (2006) 485-499
3. Azevedo R., Cromley J.G., Winers F.I., Moos D.C., and Greene J.A. Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science 33 5-6 (2005) 381-412
4. Babb, I., Brown, S. W., & Schifele, P. (2001). Classroom of the sea. Retrieved 26.11.07.
5. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran V.S. (Ed). Encyclopedia of human behavior Vol. 4 (1994), Academic Press, New York 71-81
6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (1997), W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
7. Bong M. Generality of academic self-efficacy judgments: Evidence of hierarchical relations. Journal of Educational Psychology 89 4 (1997) 696-709
8. Bowe F.G. Deaf and hard of hearing Americans' instant messaging and e-mail use: A national survey. American Annals of the Deaf 147 4 (2002) 6-10
9. In: Bransford J.D., Brown A.L., and Cocking R.R. (Eds). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (1999), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
10. Britner S.L., and Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science Engineering 7 (2001) 271-285
11. Britner S.L., and Pajares F. Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 5 (2006) 485-499
12. Bruch M.A., Gorsky J.M., Collins T.M., and Berger P.A. Shyness and sociability reexamined: A multicomponent analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 5 (1989) 904-915
13. Choi I., Land S.M., and Turgeon A.Y. Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional science 33 5-6 (2005) 483-511
14. Collins A. Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In: Idol L., and Jones B.F. (Eds). Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (1991), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 121-138
15. Collins A., Brown J.S., and Newman S.E. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In: Resnick L. (Ed). Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (1989), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 453-494
16. Davis E.A., and Linn M. Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education 22 8 (2000) 819-837
17. DeTure M. Cognitive style and self-efficacy: Predicting student success in online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 18 1 (2004) 21-38
18. Dunlap J.C. Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession. Educational Technology Research and Development 53 1 (2005) 66-85
19. Ge X., and Land S.M. A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development 52 2 (2004) 5-22
20. Graves M.F., and Braaten S. Scaffolded reading experiences: Bridges to success. Preventing School Failure 40 4 (1996) 169-173
21. Greene B.A., and Land S.M. A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the World Wide Web. Journal of Educational Computing Research 23 2 (2000) 151-179
22. Hannafin M., Land S., and Oliver K. Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In: Reigeluth C.M. (Ed). Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory Vol. 2 (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 115-140
23. Hewitt J. Beyond threaded discourse. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 7 3 (2001) 207-221
24. Hobsbaum A., Peters S., and Sylva K. Scaffolding in reading recovery. Oxford Review of Education 22 1 (1996) 17-35
25. Hodges C.B. Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: A review of the literature and directions for research. Performance Improvement Quarterly 2 3-4 (2008) 7-25
26. Ice, P., Wells, J., & Phillips, P. (2006). Using asynchronous auditory feedback to enhance teaching presence and students' sense of community. Paper presented at the 12th annual Sloan-C international conference on asynchronous learning networks, Orlando, FL.
27. Kim Y., Baylor A.L., and Shen E. Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The impact of agent emotion and gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 3 (2007) 220-234
28. Kozma R.B. Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development 42 2 (1994) 7-19
29. Lajoie S.P. Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls Vol. 2 (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
30. Land S.M. Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 48 3 (2000) 61-78
31. Lane J., and Lane A. Self-efficacy and academic performance. Social Behavior and Personality 29 7 (2001) 687-694
32. Lane J., Lane A., and Kyprianou A. Self-efficacy, self-esteem and their impact on academic performance. Social Behavior and Personality 32 3 (2004) 247-256
33. Lee, C.-Y., & Witta, E. L. (2001). Online students' perceived self-efficacy: Does it change? November. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for educational communications and technology, Atlanta, GA.
34. Lent R.W., Brown S.D., and Gore P.A. Discriminant and predictive validity of academic self-concept, academic self-efficacy, and mathematics-specific self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology 44 3 (1997) 307-315
35. Linn M.C., and Hsi S. Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners (2000), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
36. Multon K.D., Brown S.D., and Lent R.W. Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology 38 1 (1991) 30-38
37. Oliver K., and Hannafin M.J. Student management of web-based hypermedia resources during open-ended problem solving. The Journal of Educational Research 94 2 (2000) 75-92
38. Pajares F., and Valiante G. Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing. Journal of Educational Research 90 (1997) 353-360
39. Palinscar A.S. The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist 21 1-2 (1986) 73-98
40. Pena-Shaff J., Martin W., and Gay G. An epistemological framework for analyzing student interactions in computer-mediated communication environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 12 1 (2001) 41-68
41. Pena-Shaff J., Altman W., and Stephenson H. Asynchronous online discussions as a tool for learning: Students' attitudes, expectations, and perceptions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 16 4 (2005) 409-430
42. Rosenshine B., and Meister C. The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership 49 7 (1992) 26-33
43. Saye J.W., and Brush T. Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development 50 3 (2002) 77-96
44. Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2007). Persistent issues in history network. Retrieved 26.11.07.
45. Schunk D.H. Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist 26 3&4 (1991) 201-231
46. Shapiro W.L., and Roskos K. Technology-enhanced learning environments. Change 27 6 (1995) 67-69
47. Sharma P., and Hannafin M.J. Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments 15 1 (2007) 27-46
48. Spiro R.J., Feltovich P.J., Jacobson M.J., and Coulson R.L. Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In: Duffy T.M., and Jonassen D.H. (Eds). Constructivism and the technology of instruction (1992), Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 57-75
49. Wang F., and Hannafin M.J. Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 53 4 (2005) 5-23
50. Wang A.Y., and Newlin M.H. Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior 18 2 (2002) 151-163
51. Webb N.M., and Palinscar A.S. Group processes in the classroom. In: Berliner D.C., and Calfee R.C. (Eds). Handbook of educational psychology (1996), Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York 841-873
52. Wood D., Bruner J., and Ross G. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 17 (1976) 89-100
53. Zimmerman B. Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (2000) 82-91