Use of a measure of reading comprehension to enhance prediction on the state high stakes assessment

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 316-328

  Shapiro, Edward S ^a   Solari, Emily ^b   Petscher, Yaacov ^c  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Oral reading fluency; Reading comprehension; RTI

Indexed keywords

EID: 49449110085     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adams M.J. Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
2. Berninger V.W., Abbott R.D., Billingsley F., and Nagy W. Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In: Wolf M. (Ed). Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (2001), Parkton, MD: York 383-414
3. Buck J., and Torgesen J. The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (Technical Report 1) (2003), Florida Center for Reading Research, Tallahassee, FL
4. Burns M.K., Appleton J.J., and Stehouwer J.D. Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 23 4 (2005) 381-394
5. Catts H.W., and Hogan T.P. Language basis of reading disabilities and implications for early identification and remediation. Reading Psychology 24 (2003) 223-246
6. Crawford L., Tindal G., and Stieber S. Using oral reading rate to predict student performance on statewide achievement tests. Educational Assessment 7 (2001) 303-323
7. CTB-McGraw Hill. Pennsylvania Grade 3 Assessment Mathematics and Reading Technical Report (2006), CTB McGraw Hill. http://www.pde.state.pa.us/a_and_t/lib/a_and_t/2006_Gr3_Tech_Report.pdf (available http://www.pde.state.pa.us/a_and_t/lib/a_and_t/2006_Gr3_Tech_Report.pdf)
8. Danielson L., Doolittle J., and Bradley R. Past accomplishments and future challenges. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 28 (2005) 137-139
9. Data Recognition Corporation. Technical report for the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment, 2006 Reading and Mathematic Grades 4, 6, 7 (2007). http://www.pde.state.pa.us/a_and_t/lib/a_and_t/2006_ReadingMathGr4_6_7_Tech_Report.pdf (available at http://www.pde.state.pa.us/a_and_t/lib/a_and_t/2006_ReadingMathGr4_6_7_Tech_Report.pdf)
10. Data Recognition Corporation. Technical report for the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment, 2006 Reading and Mathematic Grades 5, 8, 11 (2007). http://www.pde.state.pa.us/a_and_t/lib/a_and_t/2006_ReadingMathGr4_6_7_Tech_Report.pdf (available at http://www.pde.state.pa.us/a_and_t/lib/a_and_t/2006_ReadingMathGr4_6_7_Tech_Report.pdf)
11. Duke N.K., Pressley M., and Hilden K. Difficulties with reading comprehension. In: Stone C.A., Stillman R., Ehren B.J., and Apel K. (Eds). Handbook of language and literacy (2004)
12. Fuchs D., Fuchs L.S., Mathes P.G., Lipsey M.W., and Roberts H.P. Is "learning disabilities" just a fancy term for low achievement? A meta-analysis of reading differences between low achievers with and without the label. In: Bradley R., Danielson L., and Hallahan D. (Eds). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. The LEA series on special education and disability (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 737-762
13. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hamlett C.L., Waltz L., and Germann G. Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth should we expect?. School Psychology Review 22 (1993) 27-48
14. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hosp M.K., and Jenkins J.R. Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis (2001), Scientific Studies of Reading 5
15. Fuchs L.S., Tindal G., and Deno S. Effects of varying item domain and sample duration on technical characteristics of daily measures in reading University of Minnesota (1981), Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities
16. Gersten R., and Dimino J.A. RTI (response to intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly 41 1 (2006) 99-108
17. Good R.H., and Jefferson G. Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In: Shinn M.R. (Ed). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (1998), Guilford, New York 61-88
18. Good R.H., Simmons D., and Kame'enui E. The importance of decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading 5 (2001) 257-288
19. Gough P.B., and Tunmer W.E. Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial & Special Education 7 (1986) 6-10
20. In: Haager D., Klingner J., and Vaughn S. (Eds). Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (2007), Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD
21. Hamilton C., and Shinn M.R. Characteristics of word callers: An investigation of the accuracy of teachers' judgments of reading comprehension and oral reading skills. School Psychology Review 32 (2003) 228-240
22. Hanley J.A., and McNeil B.J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148 (1983) 839-843
23. Hasbrouck J.E., and Tindal G. Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5. Teaching Exceptional Children (1992, Spring) 41-44
24. Hasbrouck J.E., and Tindal G. Oral reading fluency: 90 years of measurement. Technical report #33 (2005), Behavioral Research and Training, Eugene, OR
25. Hintze J.M., and Silberglitt B. A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of R-CBM and high-stakes testing. School Psychology Review 34 (2005) 372-386
26. Kame'enui E., and Simmons D. Introduction to this special issue: The DNA of reading fluency. Scientific Studies of Reading 5 (2001) 203-210
27. Kaminski R.A., and Good R.H. Assessing early literacy skills in a problem-solving model: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. In: Shinn M.R. (Ed). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (1998), Guilford, New York 113-142
28. Keller M.A., and Shapiro E.S. General outcome measures and performance on standardized tests: An examination of long-term predictive validity. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists Convention, Atlanta, GA (2005)
29. Marston D.B. A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In: Shinn M.R. (Ed). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (1989), Guilford Press, New York 18-78
30. Marston D., and Magnusson D. Implementing curriculum-based measurement in special education and regular education settings. Exceptional Children 52 (1985) 266-276
31. McGlinchey M.T., and Hixson M.D. Using curriculum-based measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. School Psychology Review 33 (2004) 193-203
32. Meehl P.E., and Rosen A. Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin 3 (1955) 195-216
33. Meng X., Rosenthal R., and Rubin D.B. Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin 111 (1992) 172-175
34. Nathan R.G., and Stanovich K.E. The causes and consequences of differences in reading fluency. Theory Into Practice 30 (1991) 176-184
35. National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reports of the subgroups Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000)
36. Roehrig, A. D., Petscher, Y., Nettles, S. M., Hudson, R. F., & Torgesen, J. K. (in press). Accuracy of the DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency Measure for Predicting Third Grade Reading Comprehension Outcomes. Journal of School Psychology.
37. Schilling S.G., Carlisle J.F., Scott S., and Zeng J. Are fluency measures accurate predictors of reading achievement?. Elementary School Journal 107 (2007) 429-448
38. Shapiro E.S., Keller M.A., Edwards L., Lutz G., and Hintze J.M. General outcome measures and performance on state assessment and standardized tests: Reading and math performance in Pennsylvania. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 42 1 (2006) 19-35
39. Shephard L.A. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher 29 (2000) 4-14
40. In: Shinn M. (Ed). Curriculum based measurement: Assessing special children (1989), Guilford Press, New York
41. In: Shinn M. (Ed). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (1998), Guilford, New York
42. Shinn M., Good R.H., Knutson N., Tilly D.W., and Collins V. Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review 21 (1992) 459-479
43. Speece D.L., Case L.P., and Molloy D.E. Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 18 3 (2003) 147-156
44. Stage S., and Jacobsen M. Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessments using oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review 30 (2001) 407-419
45. Streiner D.L. Diagnosing tests: Using and misusing diagnostic screening tests. Journal of Personality Assessment 81 (2003) 209-219
46. Successful for All Foundation. 4Sight reading and math benchmarks 2006-07 technical report for Pennsylvania. Baltimore: Success for All Foundation (2007)
47. Swets J.A. Measuring the diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240 (1988) 1285-1293
48. Tatano-Beck C., and Gable R.K. Further validation of the postpartum depression screening scale. Nursing Research 50 (2001) 155-164
49. Thurlow R., and van den broek. Automaticity and inference generation. Reading and Writing Quarterly 13 (1997) 165-184
50. Tindal G., and Deno S. Daily measurement of reading: Effects of varying the size of the item pool Minneapolis (1981), Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities, University of Minnesota
51. Vaughn S., Linan-Thompson S., and Hickman P. Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children 69 4 (2003) 391-409
52. Wayman M.E., Wallace T., Tichá R., and Espin C.A. Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education 41 (2007) 85-120
53. Wood D.E. Modeling the relationship between oral reading fluency and performance on a statewide reading test. Educational Assessment 11 (2006) 85-104