Characteristics of word callers: An investigation of the accuracy of teachers' judgments of reading comprehension and oral reading skills

School Psychology Review

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 228-240

  Hamilton, Chad ^a   Shinn, Mark R ^b  

^a South Lane Public Schools ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042575215     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Baker, S. K., & Good, R. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24(4), 561-578.
2. nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Brown, L. L., & Sherbenou, R. J. (1981). A comparison of teacher perceptions of student reading ability, reading performance, and classroom behavior. The Reading Teacher, 34, 557-560.
4. Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of meta-cognitive development. Child Development, 48, 219-232.
5. Coladarci, T. (1986). Accuracy of teacher judgments of student responses to standardized test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 141-146.
6. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
8. Deno, S. L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 15, 358-374.
9. Eaves, R. C., Williams, P., Wincheter, K., & Darch, C. (1994). Using teacher judgment and IQ to estimate reading and mathematics achievement in a remedial-reading program. Psychology in the Schools, 31(3), 261-272.
10. Espin, C., Deno, S. L., Maruyama, G., & Cohen, C. (1989, March). The Basic Academic Skills Samples (BASS): An instrument for the screening and identification of children at risk for failure in regular education classrooms. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
11. Fry, E. ( 1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516, 575-578.
12. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199-208.
13. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45-58.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20-27.
15. Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1985). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137-148.
16. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Good, R. H., & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 61-88). New York: The Guilford Press.
18. Gresham, F. M., Reschly, D. J., & Carey, M. P. (1987). Teachers as "tests": Classification accuracy and concurrent validation in the identification of learning disabled children. School Psychology Review, 16, 543-553.
19. Helmke, A., & Schrader, F. W. (1987). Interactional effects of instructional quality and teacher judgment accuracy on achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 91-98.
20. Hoge, R. D., & Butcher, R. (1984). Analysis of teacher judgments of pupil achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 777-781.
21. Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297-313.
22. Hopkins, K. D., George, C. A., & Williams, D. D. (1985). The concurrent validity of standardized achievement tests by content area using teachers' ratings as criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 177-182.
23. Jenkins, J. R., Heliotis, J., Haynes, M., & Beck, K. (1986). Does passive learning account for disabled readers' comprehension deficits in ordinary reading situations? Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 69-76.
24. Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421-432.
25. Leinhardt, G. (1983), Novice and expert judgment of individual student achievement. Educational Psychologist, 18, 165-179.
26. Lloyd, J. W., Forness, S. R., & Kavale, K. A. (1998). Some methods are more effective than others. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 195-200.
27. Luftig, R. L. (1989). Assessment of learners with special needs. Boston: Allyn & Brown.
28. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What to do and why to do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement (pp. 18-78). New York: The Guilford Press.
29. Messick, S. (1986). The once and future issues of validity: Assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement (Research Rep.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
30. Parker, R., Hasbrouck, J. E., & Tindal, G. (1992). The maze as a classroom-based reading measure: Construction methods, reliability, and validity. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 195-218.
31. Petetit, L. (2000). Construct validity of curriculum-based measurement of reading: Contributions of method variance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oregon, Eugene.
32. Ramirez, C. R. (2001). An investigation of English language and reading skills on reading comprehension for Spanish-speaking English language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oregon, Eugene.
33. Salvesen, K. A., & Undheim, J. O. (1994). Screening for learning disabilities with teacher rating scales. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 60-66.
34. Sharpley, C. F., & Edgar, E. (1986). Teachers' ratings vs. standardized tests: An empirical investigation of agreement between two indices of achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 106-111.
35. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement. New York: The Guilford Press.
36. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
37. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
38. Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Romance and reality. In K. E. Stanovich (Ed.), Progress in understanding reading (pp. 392-404). New York: The Guilford Press.
39. Woodcock, R. M. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Corp.
40. Wright, D., & Wiese, M. J. (1988). Teacher judgment in student evaluation: A comparison of grading methods. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 10-14.