Curriculum-based measures and performance on state assessment and standardized tests: Reading and math performance in Pennsylvania

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 19-35

  Shapiro, Edward S ^a   Keller, Milena A ^a   Lutz, J Gary ^a   Santoro, Lana Edwards ^b   Hintze, John M ^c  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Pacific Institutes for Research   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; CBM; Curriculum based measurement; High stakes tests

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646426929     PISSN: 07342829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734282905285237     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barger, J. (2003). Comparing the DIBELS oral reading fluency indicator and the North Carolina end of grade reading assessment (Technical Report). Asheville: North Carolina Teacher Academy.
2. Braden, J. P. (2002). Best practices for school psychologists in educational accountability: High stakes testing and educational reform. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 1, pp. 301-320). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
3. Buck, J., & Torgeson, J. (2003). The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (Technical Report 1). Tallahassee: Florida Center for Reading Research.
4. Castillo, J. M., Torgeson, J. K., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Al Otaiba, S. (2003). Relationships of five reading fluency measures to reading comprehension in first through third grade. Manuscript in preparation.
5. Crawford, L., Tindal, G., & Stieber, S. (2001). Using oral reading rate to predict student performance on statewide achievement tests. Educational Assessment, 7, 303-323.
6. Deno, S. D. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
7. Deno, S. D. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-192.
8. Deno, S. L., Espin, C. A., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Evaluation strategies for preventing and remediating basic skill deficits. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventative and remedial approaches (pp. 213-241). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists
9. Edformation. (2005). AIMSweb progress monitoring and improvement system. Available from http://www.aimsweb.com/
10. Erikson, R., Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., & Elliott, J. (1998). Inclusive assessments and accountability systems: Tools of the trade in educational reform. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31 (2). 4-9.
11. Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516.
12. Fuchs, L. S. (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum-based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33, 188-193.
13. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488-500.
14. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28 (4). 659-671.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22 (1). 27-48.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5 (3). 239-256.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Monitoring Basic Skills Progress - Basic math computation (2nd ed., Blackline Masters). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring Basic Skills Progress - Basic math concepts and applications (2nd ed., Blackline Masters). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
19. Good, R. H., & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 61-88). New York: Guilford.
20. Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5 (3). 257-288.
21. Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement. (1996). Stanford Achievement Test (9th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
22. Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement. (2000). Metropolitan Achievement Test (8th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
23. Helwig, R., Anderson, L., & Tindal, G. (2002). Using a concept-grounded, curriculum-based measure in mathematics to predict statewide test scores for middle school students with LD. Journal of Special Education, 36 (2). 102-112.
24. Hintze, J. M., & Silberglitt, B. (2005). A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of R-CBM and high-stakes testing. School Psychology Review, 34 (3). 372-386.
25. Impara, J. C., & Plake, B. S. (Eds.). (1998). The thirteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
26. Karlsen, B., & Gardner, E. F. (1995). Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
27. Keller, M. A., & Shapiro, E. S. (2005, April). General outcome measures and performance on standardized tests: An examination of long-term predictive validity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Atlanta, GA.
28. Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29 (2). 4-16.
29. Marston, D. (1989). A curriculum-based approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
30. McGlinchey, M. T., & Hixon, M. D. (2004). Using curriculum-based measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. School Psychology Review, 33, 193-203.
31. Mead, R., Smith, R. M., & Swanlund, A. (2003, December). Technical analysis: 2003 Pennsylvania System of School Assessment, mathematics and reading. Retrieved June 1, 2005, from the Pennsylvania Department of Education Web site: http://www.pde.state.pa.us
32. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, H.R. 1, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002, January 8).
33. Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2002). Handbook for report interpretation: 2002 PSSA mathematics and reading assessment for grades 5, 8, and 11. Harrisburg, PA: Author.
34. Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2003, February). Technical analysis: Pennsylvania system of school assessment, 2002 reading and mathematics PSSA. Harrisburg, PA: Author.
35. Powell-Smith, K. A. (2004, February). Individual differences in FCAT performance: A national context for our results. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Research Conference, Coronado, CA.
36. Shaw, R., & Shaw, D. (2002). DIBELS oral reading fluency-based indicators of third grade reading skills for Colorado State Assessment Program (CSAP) (Technical Report). Eugene: University of Oregon Press.
37. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29 (7). 4-14.
38. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
39. Shinn, M. R., & Bamonto, S. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: "Big ideas" and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 1-31). New York: Guilford.
40. Shinn, M. R., Shinn, M. M., Hamilton, C., & Clarke, B. (2002). Using curriculum-based measurement in general education classrooms to promote reading success. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 113-142). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
41. Sibley, D., Biwer, D., & Hesch, A. (2001). [CBM and its relationship to state assessment in Illinois]. Unpublished data. Arlington Heights, IL: Arlington Heights School District 25.
42. Spies, R. A., & Plake, B. S. (Eds.). (2005). The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
43. Stage, S. A., & Jacobsen, M. D. (2001). Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessment using oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 30 (3). 407-419.
44. Swets, J. A. (1996). Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1-26.
46. Thurlow, M. L., & Thompson, S. J. (1999). District and state standards and assessments: Building an inclusive accountability system. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 12 (2). 3-10.