Egocentrism in procedural justice effects

Advances in Group Processes

Volumn 25, Issue , 2008, Pages 29-54

  van Prooijen, Jan Willem ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48749099987     PISSN: 08826145     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0882-6145(08)25002-2     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Adams J.S. Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 2 (1965), Academic Press, New York 267-299
2. Babcock L., and Loewenstein G. Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (1997) 109-126
3. Batson C.D., Thompson E.R., Seuferling G., Whitney H., and Strongman J.A. Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (1999) 525-537
4. Baumeister R.F., Bratlavsky E., Finkenauer C., and Vohs K.D. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5 (2001) 323-370
5. Baumeister R.F., and Leary M.R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motive. Psychological Bulletin 117 (1995) 497-529
6. Brewer M.B., and Gardner W. Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1996) 83-93
7. Brockner J., DeWitt R.L., Grover S., and Reed T. When it is especially important to explain why: Factors affecting the relationship between managers' explanation of a layoff and survivors' reactions to the layoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 26 (1990) 389-407
8. Brockner J., Heuer L., Siegel P.A., Wiesenfeld B., Martin C., Grover S., Reed T., and Bjorgvinsson S. The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1998) 394-407
9. Brockner J., and Wiesenfeld B.M. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin 120 (1996) 189-208
10. Caruso E.M., Epley N., and Bazerman M.H. The costs and benefits of undoing egocentric responsibility assessments in groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 857-871
11. Clay-Warner J. Perceiving procedural injustice: The effects of group membership and status. Social Psychology Quarterly 64 (2001) 224-238
12. Cropanzano R., and Ambrose M.L. Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and research agenda. In: Greenberg J., and Cropanzano R. (Eds). Advances in organizational justice (2001), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA 119-151
13. Cropanzano R., Byrne Z.S., Bobocel D.R., and Rupp D.E. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior 58 (2001) 164-209
14. De Cremer D. Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (2002) 1335-1341
15. De Cremer D., and Sedikides C. Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 157-173
16. De Cremer D., and Tyler T.R. Managing group behavior: The interplay between fairness, self, and cooperation. In: Zanna M. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology (2005), Academic Press, New York 151-218
17. De Cremer D., and Van Lange P.A.M. Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality 15 (2001) S5-S18
18. Dijksterhuis A., and Van Knippenberg A. Behavioral indecision: Effects of self-focus on automatic behavior. Social Cognition 18 (2000) 55-74
19. Duval T.S., and Wicklund R.A. A theory of objective self-awareness (1972), Academic Press, New York
20. Epley N., and Caruso E.M. Egocentric ethics. Social Justice Research 17 (2004) 171-188
21. Epley N., Keysar B., Van Boven L., and Gilovich T. Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 327-339
22. Folger R. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (1977) 108-119
23. Folger R. Emerging issues in the social psychology of justice. In: Folger R. (Ed). The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives (1984), Plenum Press, New York 3-24
24. Folger R. Fairness as moral virtue. In: Schminke M. (Ed). Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (1998), Erlbaum, MahWah, NJ 13-34
25. Folger R., and Cropanzano R. Organizational justice and human resource management (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
26. Gaertner L., Sedikides C., Vevea J.L., and Iuzzini J. The "I," the "we," and the "when": A meta-analysis of motivational primacy in self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002) 574-591
27. Hafer C.L., and Bègue L. Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin 131 (2005) 128-167
28. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgments. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 814-834
29. Ham J., and Van den Bos K. Not fair for me! The influence of personal relevance on social justice inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (2008) 699-705
30. Hegtvedt K.A. Approaching distributive and procedural justice: Are separate routes necessary?. Advances in Group Processes 10 (1993) 195-221
31. Hegtvedt K.A. Justice frameworks. In: Burke P. (Ed). Contemporary social psychological theories (2006), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA 46-69
32. Houlden P., LaTour S., Walker L., and Thibaut J. Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14 (1978) 13-30
33. Lerner M.J. The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion (1980), Plenum Press, New York
34. Lerner M.J. The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7 (2003) 388-399
35. Leung K., Tong K.-K., and Lind E.A. Realpolitik versus fair process: Moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (2007) 476-489
36. Lind E.A., Kanfer R., and Earley P.C. Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (1990) 952-959
37. Lind E.A., Kray L., and Thompson L. The social construction of injustice: Fairness judgments in response to own and others' unfair treatment by authorities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75 (1998) 1-22
38. Lind E.A., and Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice (1988), Plenum Press, New York
39. Loseman, A., Van den Bos, K., & Ham, J. (2005). The influence of justice and injustice on self-activation. Paper presented at the 14th EAESP General Meeting, Würzburg, Germany.
40. McClintock C.G., and Liebrand W.B.G. Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (1988) 396-409
41. Messick D.M., and McClintock C.G. Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 4 (1968) 1-25
42. Messick D.M., and Sentis K.P. Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15 (1979) 418-434
43. Miedema, J. (2003). Fairness and the self. Academic dissertation, Leiden University.
44. Moorman R.H., and Blakely G.L. Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior 16 (1995) 127-142
45. Parks C.D. The predictive ability of social values in resource dilemmas and public good games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20 (1994) 431-438
46. Rawls J. A theory of justice (1971), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
47. Silvia P.J., and Duval T.S. Objective self-awareness theory: Recent progress and enduring problems. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 (2001) 230-241
48. Smeesters D., Warlop L., Van Avermaet E., Corneille O., and Yzerbyt V. Do not prime hawks with doves: The interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (2003) 972-987
49. Thibaut J., and Walker L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis (1975), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
50. Thompson L., and Loewenstein G. Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51 (1992) 176-197
51. Tyler T.R. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (1989) 830-838
52. Tyler T.R. Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5 (1994) 850-863
53. Tyler T.R., and Blader S.L. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7 (2003) 349-361
54. Tyler T.R., Degoey P., and Smith H. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1996) 913-930
55. Tyler T.R., and Lind E.A. A relational model of authority in groups. In: Zanna M. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 25 (1992), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 115-292
56. Van den Bos K. Uncertainty management: The influence of human uncertainty on reactions to perceived fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (2001) 931-941
57. Van den Bos K. On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 482-498
58. Van den Bos K., and Lind E.A. Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 34 (2002), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1-60
59. Van den Bos K., Lind E.A., Vermunt R., and Wilke H.A.M. How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (1997) 1034-1046
60. Van den Bos K., and Van Prooijen J.-W. Referent cognitions theory: The psychology of voice depends on closeness of reference points. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 616-626
61. Van den Bos K., Wilke H.A.M., and Lind E.A. When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1998) 1449-1458
62. Van Lange P.A.M. The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (1999) 337-349
63. Van Lange P.A.M., Otten W., De Bruin E.M.N., and Joireman J.A. Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (1997) 733-746
64. Van Prooijen, J.-W., De Cremer, D., Van Beest, I., Ståhl, T., Van Dijke, M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (in press). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
65. Van Prooijen J.-W., Karremans J.C., and Van Beest I. Procedural justice and the hedonic principle: How approach versus avoidance motivation influences the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 686-697
66. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van den Bos K., Lind E.A., and Wilke H.A.M. How do people react to negative procedures? On the moderating role of authority's biased attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (2006) 632-645
67. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van den Bos K., and Wilke H.A.M. Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002) 1353-1361
68. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van den Bos K., and Wilke H.A.M. Group belongingness and procedural justice: Social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 66-79
69. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van den Bos K., and Wilke H.A.M. Procedural justice and intragroup status: Knowing where we stand in a group enhances reactions to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 664-676
70. Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Zwenk, F. (2007). Self-construal level and voice procedures: The individual self as psychological mechanism for procedural fairness effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.