General education teacher judgments of their low-performing students' short-term reading progress

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 537-549

  Graney, Suzanne Bamonto ^a  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249094934     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20322     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Algozzine, B., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Christenson, S. (1983). An analysis of the incidence of special class placement: The masses are burgeoning. Journal of Special Education, 17, 141-147.
2. Bahr, M. W., Whitten, E., Dieker, L., Kocarek, C. E., & Manson, D. (1999). A comparison of school-based intervention teams: Implications for educational and legal reform. Exceptional Children, 66, 67-83.
3. Bates, C., & Nettelbeck, T. (2001). Primary school teachers' judgments of reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 21, 177-187.
4. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-192.
5. Deno, S. L., Deno, D., Marston, D., & Marston D. (1987). Test of oral reading fluency. Minneapolis, MN: Children's Educational Services.
6. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D. B., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
7. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chaing, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
8. Eckert, T. L., Dunn, E. K., Codding, R. S., Begeny, J. C., & Kleinmann, A. E. (2006). Assessment of mathematics and reading performance: An examination of the correspondence between direct assessment of student performance and teacher report. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 247-263.
9. Feinberg, A. B., & Shapiro, E. S. (2003). Accuracy of teacher judgments in predicting oral reading fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 52-65.
10. Fuchs, L. S., (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum-based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33, 188-192.
11. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Curriculum-based measurement: Describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying treatment nonresponders. Peabody Journal of Education, 77, 64-84.
12. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
13. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20-28.
16. Good, R. H., & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
17. Graney, S. B., & Shinn, M. R. (2005). The effects of R-CBM teacher feedback in general education classrooms. School Psychology Review, 34, 184-201.
18. Hamilton, C., & Shinn, M. R. (2003). Characteristics of word callers: An investigation into the accuracy of teachers'judgments of reading comprehension and oral reading skills. School Psychology Review, 32, 228-240.
19. Hecht, S. A., & Greenfield, D. B. (2002). Explaining the predictive accuracy of teacher judgments of their students' reading achievement: The role of gender, classroom behavior, and emergent literacy skills in a longitudinal sample of children exposed to poverty. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 789-809.
20. Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297-313.
21. Hopkins, K. D., George, C. A., & Williams, D. D. (1985). The concurrent validity of standardized achievement tests by content area using teachers' ratings as criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 177-182.
22. Leinhardt, G. (1983). Novice and expert knowledge of individual student's achievement. Educational Psychologist, 18, 165-179.
23. Luce, S. R., & Hoge, R. D. (1978). Relations among teacher rankings, pupil-teacher interactions, and academic achievement: A test of the teacher expectancy hypothesis. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 489-500.
24. Madelaine, A., & Wheldall, K. (2005). Identifying low-progress readers: Comparing teacher judgment with a curriculumbased measurement procedure. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 52, 33-42.
25. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
26. Ritts, V., Patterson, M. L., & Tubbs, M. E. (1992). Expectations, impressions, and judgments of physically attractive students: A review. Review of Educational Research, 62, 413-426.
27. Safer, N., & Fleischman, S. (2005). How student progress monitoring improves instruction. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 81-83.
28. Salmon-Cox, L. (1981). Teachers and standardized achievement tests: What's really happening? Phi Delta Kappa, 62, 631-634.
29. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
30. Shinn, M. R., & Bamonto, S. M. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: "Big ideas" and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
31. Shinn, M. R., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). Administration and scoring of reading curriculum-based measurement (R-CBM) for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation, Inc.
32. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, D., & Collins, V. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
33. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., & Stein, S. (1989). Summarizing trend in student achievement: A comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 18, 356-370.
34. Truscott, S. D., Cohen, C. E., Sams, D. P., Sanborn, K. J., & Frank, A. J. (2005). The current state(s) of prereferral intervention teams: A report from two national surveys. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 130-140.
35. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential pitfalls. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 137-146.
36. Wright, D., & Weise, M. J. (1988). Teacher judgment in student evaluation: A comparison of grading methods. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 10-14.
37. Wyatt-Smith, C., Castleton, G., Freebody, P., & Cooksey, R. (2003). The nature of teachers' qualitative judgments: A matter of context and salience. Part one: "In-context" judgment. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(2), 11-32.
38. Ysseldyke, J. E., Vanderwood, M. L., & Shriner, J. (1997). Changes over the past decade in special education referral to placement probability: An incredibly reliable practice. Diagnostique, 23, 193-201.