Effects of Reading Curriculum-Based Measurement (R-CBM) teacher feedback in general education classrooms

School Psychology Review

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 184-201

  Graney, Suzanne Bamonto ^a   Shinn, Mark R ^b  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544485970     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baker, J. M., & Zigmond, N. (1990). Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities? Exceptional Children, 56, 515-526.
2. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
3. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
4. Crawford, L., Tindal, G., & Steiber, S. (2001). Using reading rate to predict student performance on statewide reading tests. Educational Assessment, 7, 303-323.
5. Deno, S. L. (1985). CBM: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
6. Deno, S. L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 15, 358-374.
7. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in Curriculum-Based Measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-192.
8. Deno, S. L., Deno, D., Marston, D., & Marston D. (1987). Test of Oral Reading Fluency. Minneapolis: Children's Educational Services.
9. Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
10. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
11. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
12. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199-208.
13. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28, 659-671.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., & Bentz, J. (1994). Classwide Curriculum-Based Measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60, 518-537.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., & Karns, K. (1995). General educators' specialized adaptation for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 440-459.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239-256.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20-28.
19. Jenkins, J. R., Mayhall, W. F., Peschka, C., & Townsend, V. (1974). Using direct and daily measures to increase learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(10), 14-17.
20. Lane, K. L., Mahdavi, J. N., & Borthwick-Duffy, S. (2003). Teacher perceptions of the prereferral intervention process: A call for assistance with school-based interventions. Preventing School Failure, 47(4), 148-155.
21. Marston, D. B. (1989). A CBM approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-Based Measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
22. McDaniel, T. R. (1999). School accountability. Clearing House, 72(3), 132-133.
23. McGlinchey, M. T., & Hixson, M. D. (2004). Using Curriculum-Based Measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. School Psychology Review, 33, 193-203.
24. National Center on Student Progress Monitoring. (2005). Review of progress monitoring tools.
25. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Reading First state grants, Title 1, Section 1003(g). Retrieved February 28, 2005 from http://www.studentprogress.org
26. Scott, B. J., Vitale, M. R., & Masten, W. J. (1998). Implementing instructional adaptations for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: A literature review. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 106-118.
27. Shinn, M. R. (2002). Best practices in curriculum-based measurement and its use in a problem-solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 671-698). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
28. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, D., & Collins, V. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
29. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., & Stein, S. (1989). Summarizing trend in student achievement: A comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 18, 356-370.
30. Shinn, M. R., Powell-Smith, K. A., Good, R. H., & Baker, S. (1997). The effects of reintegration into general education reading instruction for students with mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 59-79.
31. Shinn, M. R., & Shinn, M. M. (2001). Curriculum-Based Measurement: Cheaper, faster, and better assessment of students with learning disabilities. In L. Denti & P. Tefft-Cousin (Eds.), New ways of looking at learning disabilities: Connections to classroom practice (pp. 85-109). Denver: Love Publishing Company.
32. Shinn, M. R., & Shinn, M. M. (2003). Aimsweb™ training workbook administration and scoring of Reading Curriculum-Based Measurement (R-CBM) for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation, Inc.
33. Shinn, M. R., Shinn, M. M., Hamilton, C., & Clarke, B. (2002). Using curriculum-based measurement to promote achievement in general education classrooms. In M. R. Shinn, G. Stoner, & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 113-142). Bethesda, MD: National Assocation of School Psychologists.
34. Wesson, C. L. (1991). Curriculum-based measurement and two models of follow-up consultation. Exceptional Children, 57, 246-256.
35. Wesson, C. L., Skiba, R., Sevcik, B., King, R. P., & Deno, S. (1984). The effects of technically adequate instructional data on achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 17-22.