Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 134-140

  Swanson, T K ^a   Feigal, R J ^b   Tantbirojn, D ^b   Hodges, J S ^b  

^a University of Minnesota ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Enamel beveling; Marginal integrity; Self etch adhesive; Total etch adhesive

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND PLUS;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SILVER STAINING; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TEMPERATURE; TIME; TOOTH DISEASE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; SILVER STAINING; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 46749090524     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1996;27:775-84.
2. Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Wilder AD, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. Clinical evaluation of two onebottle dentin adhesives at three years. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:1117-23.
3. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangaç B. The effect of currentgeneration bonding systems on the microleakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 2002;33:763-9.
4. Perdigão J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of selfetching adhesives to intact vs prepared enamel. J Esthet Rest Dent 2003;15:32-42.
5. Kelsey WP, Latta MA, O'Meara JD, Barkmeier WW, Hammesfahr PD, Jefferies SR. An accelerated in vitro model for adhesive testing. Am J Dent 2004;17:323-6.
6. Pradelle-Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, Colon P. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial microleakage. Am J Dent 2001;14:344-8.
7. Fabianelli A, Kugel G, Ferrari M. Efficacy of self-etching primer on sealing margins of Class II restorations. Am J Dent 2003;16:37-41.
8. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, Milia E. Influence of margin bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents. Am J Dent 2004;17:257-61.
9. Pamir T, Türkün M. Factors affecting microleakage of a packable resin composite: An in vitro study. Oper Dent 2005;30:338-45.
10. Brackett WW, Haisch LD, Pearce MG, Brackett MG. Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:42-5.
11. Casagrande L, Brayner R, Sarmento Barata J, Borba de Araujo F. Cervical microleakage in composite restorations of primary teeth-in vitro study. J Dent 2005;33:627-32.
12. Atash R, Vanden Abbeele A. Sealing ability of new generation adhesive systems in primary teeth: An in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 2004;26:322-8.
13. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
14. Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995;26:95-110.
15. Fortin D, Perdigão J, Swift EJ. Microleakage of three new dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1994;7:315-8.
16. Fortin D, Swift EJ, Denehy GE Reinhardt JW. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1994;10:253-8.
17. Davidson CL, Abdalla AI. Effect of occlusal loading on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1994;7:111-4.
18. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AL, Liu P. Microleakage of multistep and simplified step bonding systems. Am J Dent 1996;9:245-8.
19. Schmitt DC, Lee J. Microleakage of adhesive resin systems in the primary and permanent dentitions. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:587-93.
20. El-Housseiny AA, Farsi N. Sealing ability of a single bond adhesive in primary teeth: An in vivo study. Int J Pediatr Dent 2002;12:265-70.
21. Croll TP, Berg J. Simplified adhesion of compomers in pediatric dentistry. Quintessence Int 2000;3:563-9.
22. Cardoso PE, Placido E, Francci CE, Perdigão J. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1999;12:291-4.
23. Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent 2000;13:44-50.
24. Gagliardi RM, Aelar RP. Evaluation of microleakage using different bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002;27:582-6.
25. Ripa LW Gwinnett AJ, Buonocore MG. The "prismless" outer layer of deciduous and permanent enamel. Arch Oral Bio 1966;11:41-8.
26. Kodaka T, Nakajima F, Higashi S. Structure of the so-called "prismless" enamel in human deciduous teeth. Caries Res 1989;23:290-6.
27. Robinson C, Kirkham J, Shore R. Dental Enamel: Formation to Destruction. New York, NY: CRC Press Inc; 1995.
28. Nozaka K, Suruga Y, Amari E. Microleakage of composite resins in cavities of upper primary molars. Int J Pediatr Dent 1999;9:185-94.
29. Shimada Y, Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y, Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent 2002;27:403-9.
30. Dias da Silva Telles P, Aparecida M, Machado M, Nör JE. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001;23:315-20.
31. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJM, Kuijs R, Burgersdijk RCW. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations. J Prosth Dent 1998;80:274-9.
32. Silverstone LM. The acid-etch technique: In vitro studies with special reference to the enamel surface and the enamel-resin interface. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acid-Etch Technique. St. Paul, Minn.: North Central Publishing Co; 1975.
33. Moore DH, Vann WF. The effect of a cavosurface bevel on microleakage in posterior composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:21-4.
34. Munechika T, Suzuki K, Nishiyama M, Ohashi M, Horie K. A comparison of the tensile bond strengths of composite resin to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res 1984;63:1079-82.
35. Bui T. Cut Enamel Prism Orientation Affects the Selfetched Bond Interface [thesis]. Minneapolis, Minn: Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Minnesota; 2005.
36. Hoelscher DC, Gregory WA, Linger JB, Pink, FE. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:171-5.
37. Bowen RL, Nemoto K, Rapson JE. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: Forces developed in composite materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;106:475-7.
38. Eriksen HM, Buonocore MG. Marginal leakage with different composite restorative materials in vitro. Effects of cavity design. J Oral Rehabil 1976;3:315-22.
39. Crim GA, Mattingly SL. Microleakage and the Class V composite cavosurface. J Dent Child 1980;47:333-6.
40. Gordon M, Wasserstein A, Gorfil C, Imber S. Microleakage in three designs of glass ionomer under composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1991;18:149-54.
41. Ireland E, Xu X, Burgess JO. Microleakage of beveled and nonbeveled Class 3 restorations [abstract]. J Dent Res 1998; 77:939.
42. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Milia E. The effect of cavity margin design on the microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with three self-etching agents. J Dent Res 2003;82:C-531.
43. Lee BB, White GE. Chamfered margin effects on occlusal microleakage of primary molar Class I composite resin restorations in vitro. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998;22:113-6.
44. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308.
45. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas P. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-35.
46. rd International Kuraray Symposium; 1999.
47. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho R, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:83-98.
48. Hobson RS, McCabe JF. Relationship between enamel etch characteristics and resin-based bond strength. Br Dent J 2002;192:463-8.
49. Perdigão J, Gomes G, Lopes MM. Influence of conditioning time on enamel adhesion. Quintessence Int 2006;37:35-41.
50. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: Etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001;17:430-44.
51. Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobb DS. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:115-24.