Efficacy of self-etching primer on sealing margins of Class II restorations

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 37-41

  Fabianelli, Andrea ^a,b   Kugel, Gerald ^c   Ferrari, Marco ^b  

^a University of Siena ^*  (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; ETCH′ EXCITE CEMENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; PYROPHOSPHATE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TETRIC CERAM; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH DISEASE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DIPHOSPHATES; ETHANOL; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 0042020378     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Federation Dentaire Internationale, World Health Organization, World Dental Federation, Consensus statement on dental amalgam . FDI World 1995 : 9-10.
2. Hickel R, Manhart J, García-Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 41D-54D.
3. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-colored alternatives to amalgama. J Dent 1997; 25: 459-473.
4. Eakle WS, Ito RK. Effects of insertion technique on microleakage in mesio-occluso-distal composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 369-374.
5. Tjan AH, Bergh BH, Lidner C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 62-66.
6. Duncalf WV, Wilson NH. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 347-352.
7. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone based, single bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 236-244.
8. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I: Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 39-41.
9. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of hard dental tissues. Berlin: Quintessence, 1998; 20-30.
10. Sano H, Kanemura N, Burrow MF, et al. Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: Students vs. dentists. Dent Mater 1998; 17: 51-58.
11. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: Effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2001;4: 324-330.
12. Peschke A, Blunck U, Roulet JF. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations. Am J Dent 2000; 13:239-243.
13. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1212-1220.
14. Rigsby DF, Retief DH, Russell CM, et al. Marginal leakage and marginal gap dimension of three dentinal bonding system. Am J Dent 1990; 3: 289-294.
15. Ferrari M, Mason PN, Fabianelli A, et al. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 134-142.
16. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 135-144.
17. Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 123-130.
18. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Shmalz G, et al. Total bonding vs selective bonding: adaptation of Class 2 composite restoration. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 261-271.
19. Tung FF, Estafan D, Scherer W. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: An in vitro investigation. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 430-434.
20. Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Burgersdijk RCW. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 160-164.
21. Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Sealing performance of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose-Z100 in class II restorations. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 145-149.
22. Cagidiaco MC, Vichi A, Ferrari M. SEM evaluation of outside dentin-cementum layer at cervical margins of Class II restorations. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1220 (Abstr 28).
23. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Davidson CL. Resistance of cementum in Class II and V cavities to penetration by an adhesive system. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 152-162.
24. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs/ADA Council on Dental Benefit Programs. Statement on posterior resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 1627-1628.
25. Ferrari M. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. In: Davidson CL, Mjör IA. Glass-ionomer cements. Berlin: Quintessence 1999: 137-148.
26. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.Am J Dent 2002;15:198-210.
27. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.Am J Dent 2002;15:279-289.
28. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mat 1999; 15: 128-137.
29. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 60-69.
30. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Jin YT. Microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations with flowable composite linings. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 193-200.
31. Miguez PA, Pereira PNR, Suh IB et al. Gap formation and bond strength of composites lined with flowable resin. J Dent Res 2001; 80: (Abstr 1270) 194.