Sealing ability of a single bond adhesive in primary teeth. An in vivo study

International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 265-270

  El Housseiny, A A ^a   Farsi, N ^a  

^a KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE PLUS; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE PLUS; SILICON DIOXIDE; SINGLE BOND; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH DISEASE;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; CUSPID; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0036637336     PISSN: 09607439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00370.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bowen RL, Marjenhoff WA. Dental composites/glass ionomers: The materials. Advanced Dental Research 1992; 6: 44-49.
2. Rosen M, Melman GE, Cohen J. Changes in a light-cured composite resin material used to restore primary anterior teeth: an eighteen-month in vivo study. Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa 1990; 45: 251-255.
3. Kilpatrik NM. Durabililty of restorations in primary molars. Journal of Dentistry 1993; 21: 67-73.
4. Papathanasiou AG, Curzon MEJ, Fairpo CG. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of the restorations in primary molars. Pediatric Dentistry 1994; 16: 282-288.
5. Van Meerbeek B, Peuman M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. Journal of Dental Research 1994; 73: 1690-1702.
6. Bordin-Aykroyd S, Sefton J, Davies EH. In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. Dental Materials 1992; 8: 74-78.
7. Mazzeo N, Ott NW, Hondrum SO. Resin bonding to primary teeth using three adhesive systems. Pediatric Dentistry 1995; 17: 112-115.
8. Kanca J. A method for bonding to tooth structure using phosphoric acid as a dentin-enamel conditioner. Quintessence International 1991; 22: 285-290.
9. Fusayama T. Total etch technique and cavity isolation. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 1992; 4: 105-109.
10. Cardoso PE, Braga RR, Carrilho MR. Evaluation of microtensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dental Materials 1998; 14: 394-398.
11. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Operative Dentistry 1998; 23: 185-194.
12. Hosaya Y, Tominoga A. A comparison of five adhesive systems to primary enamel. Pediatric Dentistry 1999; 21: 46-51.
13. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1999; 82: 209-213.
14. Kanca J. One step bond strength to enamel and dentin. American Journal of Dentistry 1997; 10: 5-8.
15. Swift EJ Jr, Bayne SC. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Operative Dentistry 1997; 22: 194-199.
16. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Cattani M et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. Journal of Dentistry 2001; 29: 55-61.
17. Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Interfacial micromorphology and shear bond strength of single bottle primer/adhesives. Dental Materials 1999; 3: 316-324.
18. Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LA, Sinhoreti MA. Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. American Journal of Dentistry 1999; 12: 181-184.
19. Al-Ehaideb A, Mohammed H. Shear bond strength of 'one bottle' dentin adhesives. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2000; 84: 408-412.
20. Moore BK, Avery DR. Dental Materials. In: McDonald RE, Avery DR, eds. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent, 7th edn. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 2000: 349-372.
21. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Kareziz A. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Operative Dentistry 2000; 25: 316-323.
22. Shidu SK. Sealing effectiveness of light cured glass ionomer cement liners. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1992; 68: 891-894.
23. Bauer JG, Henson JL. Microleakage: a measure of the performance of direct filling materials. Operative Dentistry 1984; 9: 2-9.
24. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: a review. Journal of Dentistry 1976; 4: 199-206.
25. Crim GA, Mattingly SL. Evaluation of two methods for assessing marginal leakage. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1981; 45: 160-163.
26. Litkowski LJ, McDonald NJ, Swierczewski MA. A comparison of thermocycling methods for evaluating microleakage. Journal of Dental Research 1989; 68 (Abstract): 207.
27. Pashley DH. Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1991; 66: 777-781.
28. Tao L, Pashley DH. The relationship between dentin bond strengths and dentin permeability. Dental Materials 1980; 5: 133-139.
29. Hasegawa T, Retief DH, Russel CM, Denys FR. Shear bond strength and quantitative microleakage of a multipurpose dental adhesive system resin bonded to dentin. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1995; 73: 432-438.
30. Del Nero MO, De La Macorra JC. Sealing and dentin bond strengths of adhesive systems. Operative Dentistry 1999; 24: 194-202.
31. Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L, Perez D. Marginal microleakage around enamel and cementum surfaces of two compomers. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 1998; 22: 307-315.
32. Latta MA, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW, Los SA. Laboratory evaluation of one-component dental adhesive. Journal of Dental Research 1997; 76 (Abstract): 186.
33. Swift EJ Jr, Bayne SC. Shear bond strength of a new bottle dentine adhesive. American Journal of Dentistry 1997; 10: 184-188.
34. Swift, EJ Jr, Perdigaa J, Heymann HO. Enamel bond strength of one bottle adhesives. Pediatric Dentistry 1998; 20: 259-262.
35. El Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of four adhesive systems in primary and permanent molars. Journal of Dentistry for Children 1998; 65: 169-176.
36. Tulunoglu O, Ayhan H, Olmez A, Bodur H. The effect of cavity disinfectants or microleakage in dentin bonding system. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 1998; 22: 299-305.
37. Salama FS. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 1998; 22: 285-292.
38. Khairallah C. In vitro microleakage of class V: A comparative study of three materials. Dental News 1999; 6: 35-38.
39. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. Journal of Dentistry 1998; 26: 1-20.
40. Iwase H, Momoi Y, Asanuma A, Yanagisawa K, Kohno A. Marginal leakage of composite resin gradually increased with thermal cycling. Journal of Dental Research 1989; 68 (Abstract): 923.
41. Grossman ES, Sparrius O. Marginal adaptation of composite resin-restored dentinal cavities. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1990; 64: 519-522