Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial microleakage

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 344-348

  Pradelle Plasse, Nelly ^b   Nechad, Souad ^a   Tavernier, Bruno ^c   Colon, Pierre ^c  

^a MOHAMMED V UNIVERSITY IN RABAT   (Morocco)

^b URB2I EA4462   (France)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CLEARFIL SE BOND; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; EXCITE CEMENT; FILTEK P60 COMPOSITE RESIN; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; OPTIBOND SOLO; PHOSPHORIC ACID; POLYMER; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMERS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 0035755598     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Retief DH. Do adhesives prevent microleakage? Int Dent J 1994; 44: 19-26.
2. Kidd E. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 1976; 4: 199-206.
3. Brännström M, Linden L, Aström A. The hydrodynamics of tubule and pulp fluid. A discussion of its significance in relation to dentin sensitivity. Caries Res 1967, 1: 310-317.
4. Brännström M, Linden L. The hydrodynamics of the dentine: Its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972; 22: 219-227.
5. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, et al. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effects on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 439450.
6. Brännström M. The cause of post-restorative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod 1986; 12: 475-481.
7. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, et al. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 1-8.
8. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, et al. Marginal adaptation and retention of hybrid restorative materials in vivo. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 1208 (Abstr 10).
9. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 265-273.
10. Kanca J. A method for bonding to tooth structure using phosphoric acid as dentin-enamel conditioner. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 285-290.
11. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. Micromorphological relationship between resin and dentin in vivo and in vitro. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 19-23.
12. Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992; 20: 3-10.
13. Degrange M, Attal JP, Theimer K, et al. In vitro tests of dentin bonding systems. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G, eds. State of the art on direct posterior filling materials and dentin bonding. Proceeding of the international symposium. Paris: France, 1993; 205-225.
14. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: A review. Oper Dent 1997;22:173-185.
15. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Dentine permeability and tracer tests. J Dent 1999; 27: 1-11.
16. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, et al. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20.
17. Barnes DM, Thompson VP, Blank LW, et al. Microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations: A comparison between in vivo and in vitro. Oper Dent 1993; 18: 237-245.
18. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1993; 21: 158-162.
19. Ferrari M, Yamamoto K, Vichi A, et al. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of adhesive restorative systems. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 217-219.
20. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal and axial wall integrity of in vivo and in vitro made adhesive Class V restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 257-269.
21. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Shear bond strength and microleakage of new dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 295-298.
22. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27: 89-99.
23. Wendt SL, McInnes PM, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 181-184.
24. Gage JP, Clarke DF. Comparison between two procion dyes and alizarin red to assess marginal leakage in resin restorations. A laboratory study. Aust Dent J 1991;36:81-93.
25. Brown WS, Jacobs HR, Thompson RE. Thermal fatigue in teeth. J Dent Res 1972; 51: 461-467.
26. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymeri-zation stresses at the margins of posterior composite restorations. A new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 111-784.
27. Roulet J, Reich T, Blunk U, et al. Quantitative marginal analysis in the scanning electron microscope. Scan Elect Microsc 1989; 3: 147-159.
28. Saunders WP, Grieve AR, Russell EM, et al. The effects of dentin bonding agents on marginal microleakage of composite restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17: 519-527.
29. Yu XY, Davis EL, Joynt RB, et al. Bond strenght evaluation of a Class V composite resin restoration. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 391-396.
30. Barnes DM, McDonald NJ, Thompson VP, et al. Microleakage in facial and lingual Class 5 composite restorations: A comparison. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 133-137.
31. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 117-125.
32. Dejou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the results of in vitro evaluation of microleakage. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 342-349.
33. Relief DH, Denys FR. Adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1989; 2: 133-144.
34. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, et al. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in Class V and Class II preparations. J Dent 1997;25:379-389.
35. Chan KC, Swift EJ. Marginal seal of new generation dental bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 420-423.
36. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restora-tions bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10: 296-304.
37. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 209-213.
38. Placido E, Cardoso PEC. Microleakage of Class V resin restorations using new hydrophilic universal adhesives. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 131 (Abstr 201).
39. Belluz M, Gagliani M, Brenna F, et al. Microleakage of a new dentinal bonding system: An in vitro study. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 939 (Abstr 2457).
40. Kubo S, Konishi Y, Yokota H, et al. Effect of enamel etching with phosphoric acid on marginal sealing of current adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 394 (Abstr 3015).
41. Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Burgersdijk RCW. Micro-leakage of Class II box-type composite restorations. J Dent Res 1998; 11: 160-164.
42. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, et al. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clerfil Liner Bond 2 in class V restorations. J Dent Res 1997; 10: 66-70.
43. Opdam NJM, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJM, et al. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: In vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation and microleakage. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 229-234.
44. Wang T, Nakabayashi N. Effect of 2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl phenyl hydrogen phosphate on adhesion to dentin. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 59-66.
45. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 1997; 25: 355-372.
46. Perdigão J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, et al. Effects of self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 141-146.
47. Ireland E, Xu X, Burgess JO. Microleakage of beveled and non-bevelled Class 3 resin restorations. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 939 (Abstr 207).
48. Oilo G, Jorgensen KD. Effect of bevelling on the occurrence of fracture in the enamel surrounding composite resin fillings. J Oral Rehabil 1977; 4: 305-308.
49. Crim GA, Chapman KW. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: An in vitro study. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 781-785.
50. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 48-56.
51. Castelnuovo J, Anthony HLJ, Liu P. Microleakage of multi-step and simplified-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 245-248.
52. Martin E. Marginal seal of cervical tooth-colored restora-tions. A laboratory investigation of placement technique. Aust Dent J 1993 ; 38: 102-107.
53. Sidhu SK. A comparative analysis of techniques of restor-ing cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 553-559.
54. Sjödin L, Uusitalo M, Van Dijken J. Resin modified glass ionomer cements. In vitro meacroleakage in direct Class V and Class II sandwith restorations. Swed Dent J 1996; 20: 77-86.
55. Da Cunha Mello FS, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, et al. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 372-376.
56. Mazer RB, Russell RR. The use of flowable composite resin in Class V restorations: microleakage evaluation. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 939 (Abstr 202).
57. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1240-1243.
58. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strenght and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems? J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-664.
59. Van Meerbeck B, Williens G, Celis JP, et al. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 1434-1442.
60. Fortin D, Swift EJ, Denehy GE, et al. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 253-258.
61. Swift EJ, Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, et al. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 100-104.
62. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeck B, et al. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable compo-sites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999; 5: 128-137.