Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 171-175

  Hoelscher, Diane C ^a   Gregory, William A ^b   Linger, Jackson B ^a   Pink, Frank E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; PRISMA TPH RESIN COMPOSITE; RESIN; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGHT; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SILVER STAINING; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH DISEASE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMAN; INCISOR; LIGHT; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; POLYVINYLS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SILOXANES; SILVER STAINING; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0034252765     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Araujo PA de, Asmussen E. Effect of dentin adhesives on contraction of restorative resins in cavities surrounded by acid-etched enamel. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 333-336.
2. Ben-Amar A. Microleakage of composite resin restorations. Am J Dent 1989; 2: 175-180.
3. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, et al. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 17-24.
4. Bausch JR, Delange K, Davidson CL, et al. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:59-67.
5. Lutz F, Imfeld T, Barbakow F, et al. Optimizing the marginal adaptation of MOD composite restorations. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. St. Paul: 3M Co., 1985; 409-419.
6. Roulet JF, Seewaldt A, Noack MJ. Margin quality of Class III and IV composites in vitro. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 179-185.
7. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, et al. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 659-664.
8. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 1976; 4: 199-206.
9. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 103-111.
10. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, et al. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 439-450.
11. Brännström M. Infection beneath composite resin restorations: Can it be avoided? Oper Dent 1987; 12: 158-163.
12. Donly KJ, Dowell A, Anixiadas C, et al. Relationship among visible light source, composite resin polymerization shrinkage, and hygroscopic expansion. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 883-886.
13. Hansen EK. Visible light-cured composite resins: Polymerization contraction, contraction pattern and hygroscopic expansion. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90: 329-335.
14. Fusayama T. Biologic problems of the light-cured composite resin. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 225-226.
15. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, et al. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margin of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 777-784.
16. Godder B, Settembrini L, Zhukovsky L. Direct-shrinkage composite placement. Gen Dent 1995; 43: 444-446.
17. Mangum FI, Berry EA, DeSchepper E, et al. Microleakage of incremental versus compression matrix bulk filling of cervical restorations. Gen Dent 1994; 42: 304-308.
18. Segura A, Donly KJ, Croll TP. The effect of polymerization shrinkage during veneer placement. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 629-632.
19. Törstenson B, Oden A. Effects of bonding agent types and incremental techniques on minimizing contraction gaps around resin composites. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 218-223.
20. Eriksen HM, Buonocore MG. Marginal leakage with different composite restorative materials in vitro. Effect of cavity design. J Oral Rehabil 1976; 3: 315-322.
21. Eliasson ST, Hill GL. Cavosurface design and marginal leakage of composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1977; 2: 55-58.
22. Relief DH, Woods E, Jamison HC. Effect of cavosurface treatment on marginal leakage in Class V composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 47: 496-501.
23. Krejci I, Sparr D, Lutz F. A three-sited light curing technique for conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1987; 18: 125-131.
24. Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, et al. The art and science of operative dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc; 1995; 552.
25. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977; 33: 363-374.
26. Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ. Bacterial penetration, pulpal reaction and the inner surface of Concise Enamel Bond. Composite fillings in etched and unetched cavities. J Dent Res 1978; 57: 3-10.
27. Porte A, Lutz F, Lund MR, et al. Cavity designs for composite resins. Oper Dent 984; 9: 50-56.
28. Schneider PM, Messer LB, Douglas WH. The effect of enamel surface reduction in vitro on the bonding of composite resin to permanent human enamel. J Dent Res 1981; 60: 895-900.
29. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-1639.