Recent developments in dentin bonding

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 44-50

  Haller, Bernd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; COLLAGEN; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENTS; POLYMER;

CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTIN; DIFFUSION; ENAMEL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; POROSITY; REVIEW; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACETONE; ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; COLLAGEN; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DIFFUSION; HUMAN; POLYMERS; POROSITY;

EID: 0034139768     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Pashley DH, Michelich V, Kehl T. Dentin permeability: Effects of smear layer removal. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 46: 531-537.
2. Pashley EL, Talman R, Horner JA, et al. Permeability of normal versus carious dentin. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991; 7: 207-211.
3. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1998.
4. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 133-138.
5. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, et al. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1530-1540.
6. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, et al. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 618-631.
7. Haller B, Klaiber B, Dürner U, et al. Dentinpermeabilität nach Behandlung mit Clearern und Primern. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992; 47: 171-175.
8. Macko DJ, Rutberg M, Langeland K. Pulpal response to the application of phosphoric acid to dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;45: 930-946.
9. Brännström M. Smear layer: Pathological and treatment considerations. Oper Dent (Suppl) 1984; 3: 35-42.
10. Triolo PT Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Barkmeier WW. Shear bond strengths of composite to dentin using six dental adhesive systems. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 46-50.
11. Haller B, Fritzenschaft A. Dentinhaftung von Ein-und Mehrkomponenten-Haftvermittlern bei Dry und Moist Bonding in vitro. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1999; 54: 225-230.
12. Haller B, Windsheimer U, Hofmann N, et al. Selektive Schmelzätzung oder Total Etching? Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1995; 50: 824-827.
13. Blunck U, Haller B. Schmelz-und Dentinhaftung. In: Kappert H, Eichner K. Zahnärztliche Werkstoffe und ihre Verarbeitung. Heidelberg: Hüthig, in press.
14. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1690-1702.
15. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, et al. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20.
16. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AHL, Liu P. Microleakage of multi-step and simplified-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 245-248.
17. El-Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of four adhesive systems in primary and permanent molars. J Dent Child 1998; 65; 169-176.
18. Wakefield CW, Draughn RA, Sneed WD, et al. Shear bond strengths of six bonding systems using the pushout method of in vitro testing. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 69-76.
19. Wilder AD, Swift EJ Jr, May KN, et al. Bond strengths of conventional and simplified bonding systems. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 114-117.
20. Yap AUJ, Ho KS, Wong KM. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 666-671.
21. Price RBT, Hall GC. In vitro comparison of 10-minute versus 24-hour shear bond strengths of six dentin bonding systems. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 122-134.
22. Tjan AHL, Castelnuovo J, Liu P. Bond strength of multi-step and simplified-step systems. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 269-272.
23. Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. Extrusion bond strength to dentin of new self-priming adhesives. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 638 (Abstr 651).
24. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Snauwaert J, et al. Hybridization effectiveness of a two-step versus a three-step smear layer removing adhesive system examined correlatively by TEM and AFM. J Adhesive Dent 1999; 1: 7-23.
25. Burrow MF, Satoh M, Tagami J. Dentin bond durability after three years using a dentin bonding agent with and without priming. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 302-307.
26. Lucena-Martín C, González-Rodríguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM, et al. Study of the shear bond strength of five one-component adhesives under simulated pulpal pressure. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 73-80.
27. Blunck U, Roulet J-F. Einfluß der Wasserlagerung auf die Wirksamkeit von Dentinadhäsiven. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1997; 52: 806-808.
28. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, et al. Nanoleakage: Leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 18-25.
29. Sano H, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, et al. Comparative SEM and TEM observations of nanoleakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 160-167.
30. Kato G, Nakabayashi N. Effect of phosphoric acid concentration on wet-bonding to etched dentin. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 250-255.
31. Kato G, Nakabayashi N. The durability of adhesion to phosphoric acid etched, wet dentin substrates. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 347-352.
32. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: Its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 127-129.
33. Kanca J. Improving bond strength through acid etching of dentin and bonding to wet dentin surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123: 35-43.
34. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. 1. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 39-41.
35. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, et al. Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: A paradigm using water-free adhesive primers. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1034-1044.
36. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SHY. Relation between water content in acetone/alcohol-based primer and interfacial ultrastructure. J Dent 1998; 26: 147-156.
37. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, et al. A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 50-59.
38. Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Microleakage of bonding agents with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 34-36.
39. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Am J Dent 1996; 12: 236-244.
40. De Goes MF, Ferrari GCP, Garcia-Godoy F. Resin bond strength with different methods to remove excess water from the dentin. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 298-301.
41. Kanca J III. One-Step bond strength to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 5-8.
42. Jacobsen T, Söderholm K-JM. Effect of primer solvent, primer agitation, and dentin dryness on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 225-228.
43. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH. The overwet phenomenon: A scanning electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 109-114.
44. White GJ, Beech DR, Tyas MJ. Dentin smear layer: An asset or a liability for bonding? Dent Mater 1989; 5: 379-383.
45. Pioch T, Stotz S, Buff E, et al. Influence of different etching times on hybrid layer formation and tensile bond strength. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 202-206.
46. Gwinnett AJ, Tay FR, Pang KM, et al. Quantitative contribution of the collagen network in dentin hybridization. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 140-144.
47. Inai N, Kanemura N, Tagami J, et al. Adhesion between collagen depleted dentin and dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 123-127.
48. Pioch T, Kobaslija S, Schagen B, et al. Interfacial micromorphology and tensile bond strength of dentin bonding systems after NaOCl treatment. J Adhesive Dent 1999; 1: 135-142.
49. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1212-1220.
50. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, et al. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesives. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1679-1688.
51. Hannig M, Bott B, Emmermann A. Randschlußverhalten von Klasse-II-Kompositfüllungen nach Schmelzkonditionierung mit selbstätzenden Primern. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1999; 54: 133-136.
52. Hannig M, Reinhardt K-J, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: An alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 172-118.
53. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, et al. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1404-1413.
54. Sanders-Tavares da Cunha Mello F, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, et al. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 372-376.
55. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, et al. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 244-249.
56. Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Sano H, et al. Effect of intrinsic wetness and regional difference on dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 46-53.
57. Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H, et al. Influence of thermal cycling on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 1998;11:118-122.
58. Ogata M, Nakajima M, Sano H, et al. Effect of dentin primer application on regional bond strength to cervical wedge-shaped cavity walls. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 81-88.
59. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, et al. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 66-70.
60. Cardoso PEC, Braga RR ,Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater 1999; 14: 394-398.
61. Clotten S, Blunck U, Roulet J-F. The influence of a simplified application technique for ceramic inlays on the margin quality. J Adhesive Dent 1999; 1: 159-166.
62. Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo PR Jr. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 289-293.
63. Perdigão J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, et al. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 141-146.
64. Blunck U, Roulet J-F. Marginal adaptation of compomer Class V restorations in vitro. J Adhesive Dent 1999; 1: 143-151.
65. Soltész U. Polymerisationsschrumpfung einiger neuerer Komposit-Füllungs-werkstoffe. Zahnärztl Mitt 1998; 88: 1404-1406.
66. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Polymerisation shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 128-137.
67. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1396-1399.
68. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639.
69. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 658-664.
70. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 167-171.
71. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 2-5.
72. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, et al. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 167-173.
73. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1240-1243.
74. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Verdonschot EH. Adaptation and radiographic evaluation of four adhesive systems. J Dent 1997; 25: 391-397.
75. Rees JS, O'Dougherty D, Pullin R. The stress reducing capacity of unfilled resin in a Class V cavity. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 422-427.
76. Swift EJ Jr, Triolo PT Jr, Barkmeier WW, et al. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 100-104.
77. Miyazaki M, Ando S, Hinoura K, et al. Influence of filler addition to bonding agents on shear bond strength to bovine dentin. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 234-238.
78. Suliman AA, Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 6-10.
79. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 777-783.
80. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, et al. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996; 75:871-878.
81. Mehl A, Sobota M, Hickel R. Softstartpolymerisation von Kompositen in Klasse-V-Kavitäten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1997; 52: 824-827.
82. Koran P, Kürschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998; 10: 17-22.