Microleakage of adhesive resin systems in the primary and permanent dentitions

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 587-593

  Schmitt, Donald C ^a   Lee, Jacob ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Adhesive resin; Bonding; Microleakage

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FUCHSINE; OPTIBOND FL; OPTIBOND SOLO PLUS; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SINGLE BOND; SPECTRUM COMPOSITE RESIN; TPH HYBRID;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADHESIVES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; OBSERVER VARIATION; RESIN CEMENTS; ROSANILINE DYES; STATISTICS; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 0036878829     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Buonocore M, Wileman W, Brudevolt F. A report on a resin capable of bonding to human dentin surfaces. J Den Res. 1956;35:846-851.
2. Harris R, Phillips R, Swartz M. An evaluation of two resin systems for restoration of abraded areas. J Prosth Dent. 1974;31:537-546.
3. Barkmeier W, Cooley R. Laboratory evaluation of adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 1992;5:(suppl)50-61.
4. Burke T, McCaughey A. The four generations of dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 1995;8:88-92.
5. Charlton D. Dentin bonding: past and present. Gen Dent. 1996;10:498-507.
6. Balevi B. Making sense of dentin bonding agents. Oral Health. 1995;3:29-34.
7. Kato G, Nakbayashi N. Effect of phosphoric acid concentration on wet bonding to etched dentin. Dent Mater. 1996;12:250-255.
8. Swift E, Triolo P. Bond strengths of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent. 1992;5:318-320.
9. Tulunoglu O, Bodur H, Uctasli M, Alacam A. The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage and bond strength of sealant in primary teeth. J Oral Rehab. 1999;26:436-441.
10. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH, Liu. Microleakage of multi-step and simplified-step bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1996;9:245-248.
11. Yap A, Stokes AN, Pearson GJ. An in vitro microleakage study of a new multi-purpose dental adhesive system. J Oral Rehab. 1996;23:302-308.
12. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:209-213.
13. Bordin-Aykroyd S, Sefton J, Davies E. In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. Dent Mater. 1992;8:74-78.
14. Salama F, Tao L. Comparison of Gluma bond strength to primary vs permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 1991; 13:163-166.
15. Nor J, Feigal R, Dennison J, Edwards C. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1995; 75:1396-1403.
16. Johnsen D. Comparison of primary and permanent teeth. In: Avery JA, ed. Oral Development and Histology. Philadelphia, Pa: BC Decker; 1988:180-190.
17. Wilson P, Beynon A. Mineralization differences between human deciduous and permanent enamel measured by quantitative microradiography. Arch Oral Biol. 1989;34:85-88.
18. Theuns H, Dijk J, Jongebloed W, Groenveld A. The mineral content of human enamel studied by polarizing microscopy. Arch Oral Biol. 1983;28:7797-7803.
19. Mjör I, Nordahl I. The density and branching of dentinal tubules in human teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1996;41:401-412.
20. Koutsi V, Noonan R, Horner J, Simpson M, Matthews W, Puhley D. The effect of dentin depth on the permeability and ultrastructure of primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16:29-35.
21. Borba De Araujo F, García-Godoy F, Issao M. A comparison of three resin bonding agents to primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19:253-257.
22. Davidson C, De Gee A. Relaxation of polymerization contractions stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63:146-148.
23. Jorgensen K, Hisamitsu H. Class II composite restorations: prevention in vitro of contraction gaps. J Dent Res. 1984;63:141-145.
24. Barkmeier W, Cooley R. Resin adhesive systems: in vitro evaluation of dentin bond strength and marginal microleakage. J Esthet Restor Dent. 1989;1:97-172.
25. Swartz M, Li Y, Phillips R, Moore K, Roberts T. Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res. 1985;64:1396-1401.
26. Crim G. Influence of bonding agents and composites on microleakage. J Prosth Dent. 1989;61:571-574.
27. Feilzer A, De Gee A, Davidson C. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1990;6:167-171.
28. Kidd E. Microleakage: a review. J Dent. 1976;4:199-206.
29. Walton R. Microleakage of restorative materials. Oper Dent. 1987;12:138-139.
30. Ben-Amar A. Microleakage of composite resin restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1989;2:175-180.
31. Retief D. Do adhesives prevent microleakage? Int Dent J. 1994;44:19-26.
32. Haller B, Hofman N, Klaiber B, Bloching U. Effect of storage media on microleakage of five dentin bonding agents. Dent Mat. 1993;9:191-197.
33. Crim G. Assessment of microleakage of three dentinal bonding systems. Quint Int. 1990;21:295-297.
34. Dejou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the results of in vitro evaluation of microleakage. Dent Mat. 1996;12:342-349.
35. Avery J, Visser R, Knapp D. The pattern of mineralization of enamel. J Dent Res. 1961;40:1004-1019.
36. Crabb H, Darling A. The gradient of mineralization in developing enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 1960;2:308-318.
37. Glick P. Patterns of enamel maturation. J Dent Res. 1979;58(B):883-892.