On the immunity of perceptual implicit memory to manipulations of attention

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 725-734

  Newell, Ben R ^a   Cavenett, Tamara ^a   Andrews, Sally ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPLICIT MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; READING; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; MEMORY; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 46449121626     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.4.725     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ANDREWS, S. (ED.) (2006). From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
2. ASHCRAFT, M. H. (2002). Cognition (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. BALOTA, D. A., & CHUMBLEY, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 89-106.
4. BENTIN, S., MOSCOVITCH, M., & NIRHOD, O. (1998). Levels of processing and selective attention effects on encoding in memory. Acta Psychologica, 98, 311-341.
5. BERRY, C. J., SHANKS, D. R., & HENSON, R. N. A. (2006). On the status of unconscious memory: Merikle and Reingold (1990) re-examined. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 925-934.
6. BESNER, D., & STOLZ, J. A. (1999). What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 99-104.
7. BESNER, D., STOLZ, J. A., & BOUTILIER, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 221-225.
8. BLAXTON, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 657-668.
9. CRABB, B. T., & DARK, V. J. (1999). Perceptual implicit memory requires attentional encoding. Memory & Cognition, 27, 267-275.
10. CRAIK, F. I. M., & LOCKHART, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
11. FAUL, F., ERDFELDER, E., LANG, A.-G., & BUCHNER, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible Statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
12. GABRIELI, J. D. E., VAIDYA, C. J., STONE, M., FRANCIS, W. S., THOMPSON-SCHILL, S. L., FLEISCHMAN, D. A., ET AL. (1999). Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between identification and production forms of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 479-498.
13. GRAINGER, J., & JACOBS, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
14. JACOBY, L. L., WOLOSHYN, V., & KELLEY, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
15. KAHNEMAN, D., & HENIK, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 181-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. KELLOGG, R. T., NEWCOMBE, C., KAMMER, D., & SCHMITT, K. (1996). Attention in direct and indirect memory tasks with short- and long-term probes. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 205-217.
17. KINOSHITA, S. (1995). The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 23, 569-580.
18. LIGHT, L. L., PRULL, M. W., LA VOIE, D. J., & HEALY, M. R. (2000). Dual-process theories of memory in old age. In T. J. Perfect & E. A. Maylor (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 238-300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
20. MACLEOD, C. M. (1998). Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation. Memory & Cognition, 26, 201-211.
21. MANWELL, L. A., ROBERTS, M. A., & BESNER, D. (2004). Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 458-462.
22. MERIKLE, P. M., & REINGOLD, E. M. (1991). Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 224-233.
23. MOSCOVITCH, M. (1992). Models and working with memory: A component process model based on modules and central systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 257-267.
24. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2002). Attention and perceptual implicit memory: Effects of selective versus divided attention and number of visual objects. Psychological Research, 66, 157-165.
25. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2003). Effects of cross-modal and intramodal division of attention on perceptual implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 262-276.
26. MULLIGAN, N. W., & HARTMAN, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory & Cognition, 24, 453-465.
27. MULLIGAN, N. W., & HORNSTEIN, S. L. (2000). Attention and perceptual implicit memory in the perceptual identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 626-637.
28. PARKIN, A. J., REID, T. K., & RUSSO, R. (1990). On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 507-514.
29. RAJARAM, S., SRINIVAS, K., & TRAVERS, S. (2001). The effects of attention on perceptual implicit memory. Memory & Cognition, 29, 920-930.
30. RATCLIFF, R., GOMEZ, P., & MCKOON, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159-182.
31. RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A., & GARDINER, J. M. (1998). Depth-of-processing effects on priming in stem completion: Tests of the voluntary-contamination, conceptual-processing, and lexical-processing hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 593-609.
33. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human participants. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, WELDON, M. S., & CHALLIS, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. SCHACTER, D., BOWERS, J., & BOOKER, J. (1989). Intention, awareness and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. SCHMITTER-EDGECOMBE, M. (1996). The effects of divided attention on implicit and explicit memory performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 111-125.
37. STONE, M., LADD, S. L., & GABRIELI, J. D. E. (2000). The role of selective attention in perceptual and affective priming. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 341-358.
38. STONE, M., LADD, S. L., VAIDYA, C. J., & GABRIELI, J. D. E. (1998). Word identification priming for ignored and attended words. Consciousness & Cognition, 7, 238-258.
39. STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
40. SZYMANSKI, K. F., & MACLEOD, C. M. (1996). Manipulation of attention at study affects an explicit but not an implicit test of memory. Consciousness & Cognition, 5, 165-175.
41. TULVING, E., & SCHACTER, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-306.
42. WELDON, M. S., & JACKSON-BARRETT, J. L. (1993). Why do pictures produce priming on the word-fragment completion test? A study of encoding and retrieval factors. Memory & Cognition, 21, 519-528.