Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 201-211

  Macleod, Colin M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTEGRATION; NORMAL HUMAN; READING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0031918849     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03201133     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ACKERMAN, P. L., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1984, November). Practice effects and a model for Stroop interference. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio.
2. BROWN, A. S., ENGLE, C. A., & JONES, T. C. (1992, November). Incrementing interference in the Stroop color-word task. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
3. CATTELL, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63-65.
4. CHENG, P. W., & PACHELLA, R. G. (1984). A psychophysical approach to dimensional separability. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 279-304.
5. COHEN, J. D., DUNBAR, K., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
6. DULANEY, C. L., & ROGERS, W. A. (1994). Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 470-484.
7. DUNBAR, K., & MACLEOD, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 622-639.
8. DUNN, J. C. (1983). Spatial metrics of integral and separable dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 242-257.
9. DYER, F. N. (1971). The duration of word meaning responses: Stroop interference for different preexposures of the word. Psychonomic Science, 25, 229-231.
10. DYER, F. N. (1973). Interference and facilitation for color naming with separate bilateral presentations of the word and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 314-317.
11. DYER, F. N., & SEVERANCE, L. J. (1973). Stroop interference with successive presentations of separate incongruent words and colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 438-439.
12. ELLIS, N. R., & DULANEY, C. L. (1991). Further evidence for cognitive inertia in persons with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 613-621.
13. FLOWERS, J. H., & STOUP, C. M. (1977). Selective attention between words, shapes and colors in speeded classification and vocalization tasks. Memory & Cognition, 5, 299-307.
14. GARDNER, R. W., & LONG, R. I. (1962). Cognitive controls of attention and inhibition: A study of individual consistencies. British Journal of Psychology, 53, 381-388.
15. GARNER, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
16. GARNER, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. GATTI, S. V., & EGETH, H. E. (1978). Failure of spatial selectivity in vision. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 181-184.
18. GLASER, M. O., & GLASER, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 875-894.
19. GLASER, W. R., & GLASER, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
20. GRAVES, R., & BRADLEY, R. (1988). More on millisecond timing and tachistoscope applications for the IBM PC. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 408-412.
21. KAHNEMAN, D., & CHAJCZYK, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 497-509.
22. KAHNEMAN, D., & HENIK, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 181-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. LINDSAY, D. S., & JACOBY, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 219-234.
24. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
25. LOGAN, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523-553.
26. LOGAN, G. D. (1985). Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 367-386.
27. LOWE, D., & MITTERER, J. O. (1982). Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 684-700.
28. LUPKER, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485-495.
29. MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
30. MACLEOD, C. M. (1992). The Stroop task: The "gold standard" of attentional measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 12-14.
31. MACLEOD, C. M., & DUNBAR, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 126-135.
32. MACLEOD, C. M., & HODDER, S. L. (1998). Presenting two incongruent color words on a single trial does not alter Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 26, 212-219.
33. MACLEOD, C. M., & MACDONALD, P. A. (1997). Facilitation in the Stroop task is illusory: The inadvertent reading hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. MONAHAN, J. S., & LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1977). Identification of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 94-110.
35. PHAF, R. H., VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C., & HUDSON, P. T. W. (1990). SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273-341.
36. SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1988). Attention. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 739-811). New York: Wiley.
37. SHOR, R. E., HATCH, R. P., HUDSON, L. J., LANDRIGAN, D. T., & SHAFFER, H. J. (1972). Effect of practice on a Stroop-like spatial directions task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 168-172.
38. SIMON, J. R., CRAFT, J. L., & WEBSTER, J. B. (1973). Reactions toward the stimulus source: Analysis of correct responses and errors over a 5-day period. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 175-178.
39. STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
40. TZELGOV, J., HENIK, A., & BERGER, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727-735.
41. VANAYAN, M. (1992). Relating interference and facilitation in the Stroop task: An individual-differences approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Scarborough.
42. YEE, P. L., & HUNT, E. (1991). Individual differences in Stroop dilution: Tests of the attention-capture hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 715-725.