Processing pronouns without antecedents: Evidence from event-related brain potentials

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1315-1326

  Filik, Ruth ^a   Sanford, Anthony J ^a   Leuthold, Hartmut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TIME FACTORS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 45849131648     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20090     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allen, M., Badecker, W., & Osterhout, L. (2003). Morphological analysis in sentence processing: An ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 405-430.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
3. Barber, H., Salillas, E., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Gender or genders agreement? In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension; eye-tracking, ERPs and beyond (pp. 309-328). Brighton, UK: Psychology Press.
4. Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & ter Keurs, M. (1999). Electrophysiological signatures of visual lexical processing: Open- and closed-class words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 261-281.
5. Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Barber, H. (2005). Early event-related potential effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1803-1817.
6. Dien, J., & Santuzzi, A. M. (2005). Application of repeated-measures ANOVA to high-density ERP datasets: A review and tutorial. In T. Handy (Ed.), Event related potentials: A methods handbook. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. Ditman, T., Holcomb, P., & Kuperberg, G. (2005). Examining anaphor resolution using event related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(Suppl.), 228.
8. Dwivedi, V. D., Phillips, N. A., Lague-Beauvais, M., & Baum, S. R. (2006). An electrophysiological study of mood, modal context, and anaphora. Brain Research, 1117, 135-153.
9. Erku, F., & Gundel, J. K. (1987). The pragmatics of indirect anaphors. In J. Verschueren & M. Bertuccelli-Papi (Eds.), The pragmatic perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 international pragmatics conference (pp. 533-545). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469-495.
11. Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. K. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organisation and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39, 133-146.
12. Federmeier, K. D., Segal, J. B., Lombrozo, T., & Kutas, M. (2000). Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. Brain, 12, 2552-2566.
13. Foertsch, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). In search of gender neutrality: Is singular They a cognitively efficient substitute for generic he? Psychological Science, 8, 106-111.
14. Friederici, A., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002). Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 45-63.
15. Garnham, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Sussex: Psychology Press.
16. Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. J. (1994). Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 675-698). New York: Academic Press.
17. Garrod, S. C., Freudenthal, D., & Boyle, E. (1994). The role of different types of anaphor in the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 39-68.
18. Gerrig, R. J., Horton, W. S., & Stent, A. (2006). Unheralded pronouns and theories of pronoun resolution. Paper presented at 16th annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Minneapolis, MN, July 13-15.
19. Greene, S. B., Gerrig, R. J., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Unheralded pronouns and management by common ground. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 511-526.
20. Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274-307.
21. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
22. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 273-316). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Hammer, A., Jansma, B. M., Lamers, M., & Münte, T. F. (2005). Pronominal reference in sentences about persons or things: An electrophysiological approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 227-239.
24. Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090-1103.
25. Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98-110.
26. Kennison, S. M. (2003). Comprehending the pronouns her, him, and his: Implications for theories of referential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 335-352.
27. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1997). Is she an engineer? Brain potentials and anaphora. Poster presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, Boston.
28. Klin, C. M., Guzman, A. E., Weingarter, K. M., & Ralano, A. S. (2006). When anaphor resolution fails: Partial encoding of anaphoric inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 131-143.
29. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463-470.
30. Kutas, M., Federmeier, K. D., Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Münte, T. F. (2000). Language. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 576-601). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163.
32. Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., Sturt, P., & Morrow, L. I. (2004). Constraints on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction, and type of description. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 346-364.
33. Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., & McLaughlin, J. (1997). Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Memory & Cognition, 25, 273-285.
34. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1995). Event-related potentials and language comprehension. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind (pp. 171-215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739-773.
36. Preissl, H., Pulvermüller, F., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1995). Evoked potentials distinguish between nouns and verbs. Neuroscience Letters, 197, 81-83.
37. Sanford, A. J., & Filik, R. (2007). "They" as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye-tracking reveals a processing cost. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 171-178.
38. Sanford, A. J., Filik, R., Emmott, C., & Morrow, I. (2008). They're digging up the road again: The processing cost of Institutional They. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 372-380.
39. Schmitt, B. M., Lamers, M. J. A., & Münte, T. F. (2002). Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 333-346.
40. Sereno, S. C., Brewer, C. C., & O'Donnell, P. J. (2003). Context effects in word recognition: Evidence for early interactive processing. Psychological Science, 14, 328-333.
41. Sereno, S. C., Posner, M. I., & Rayner, K. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 2195-2200.
42. Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event related potentials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 328-333.
43. Streb, J., Rösler, F., & Hennighausen, E. (1999). Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures. Brain and Language, 70, 273-286.
44. Swaab, T. Y., Camblin, C. C., & Gordon, P. C. (2004). Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 715-726.
45. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999). Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 147-182.
46. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40, 235-248.
47. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., Zwitserlood, P., & Kooijman, V. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443-467.
48. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Koornneef, A. W., Otten, M., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2007). Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research, 1146, 158-171.
49. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2004). So who's "he" anyway? Differential ERP and ERSP effects of referential success, ambiguity and failure during spoken language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 70.
50. Van Gompel, R. P. G., & Majid, A. (2004). Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns. Cognition, 90, 255-264.
51. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380-393.
52. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open and closed class words. Memory & Cognition, 19, 95-112.
53. Yule, G. (1982). Interpreting anaphora without identifying reference. Journal of Semantics, 1, 315-322.