Constraints on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction, and type of description

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 346-364

  Moxey, Linda M ^a   Sanford, Anthony J ^a   Sturt, Patrick ^a   Morrow, Lorna I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444249399     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Albrecht J. Clifton C. Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases Memory & Cognition 26 1998 599-610
2. Altmann G. Steedman M. Interaction with context during human sentence processing Cognition 30 1988 191-238
3. Badecker W. Straub K. The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 28 2002 748-769
4. Barker C. Group terms in English: Representing groups as atoms Journal of Semantics 9 1992 69-93
5. Carrieras M. Plural pronouns and the representation of their antecedents European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 9 1997 53-87
6. Clifton C. Ferreira F. Discourse structure and anaphora: Some experimental results In: Coltheart M. (Ed.) Attention and Performance Vol. X 1987 Erlbaum London
7. Eschenbach, C., Habel, C., Herweg, M., & Rehkamper, K. (1989). Remarks on plural anaphora. In Proceedings of 4th conference of European chapter of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 161-167). U Manchester
8. Ferreira F. Clifton C.E. The Independence of syntactic processing Journal of Memory and Language 25 1986 348-368
9. Garrod S.C. Sanford A.J. The mental interpretation of discourse in a focused memory system: Implications for the interpretation of anaphoric noun-phrases Journal of Semantics 1 1982 21-41
10. Garrod S.C. Freudenthal D. Boyle E. The role of different types of anaphor in the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse Journal of Memory and Language 32 1993 1-30
11. Gibson E. Pearlmutter N.E. Distinguishing serial and parallel parsing Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29 2000 231-240
12. Gordon P.C. Hendrik R. Ledoux K. Yang C.L. Processing reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases Language and Cognitive Processes 14 1999 353-379
13. Hielscher M. Müsseler J. Anaphoric resolution of singular and plural pronouns: The reference to persons being introduced by different co-ordinating structures Journal of Semantics 7 1990 347-364
14. Kamp H. Reyle U. From discourse to logic 1993 Kluwer Dordrecht
15. Kaup B. Kelter S. Habel C. Representing referents of plural expressions and plural anaphors Language and Cognitive Processes 17 2002 405-450
16. Kennison S. Comprehending the pronouns her, him and his: Implications for theories of referential processing Journal of Memory and Language 49 2003 335-352
17. Koh S. Clifton C.A. Resolution of the antecedent of a plural pronoun: Ontological categories and predicate symmetry Journal of Memory and Language 46 2002 830-844
18. Lang E. The semantics of coordination 1984 Benjamins Amsterdam
19. Lewis Falsifying serial and parallel parsing models: Empirical conundrums and an overlooked paradigm Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29 2000 241-248
20. Moxey L.M. Sanford A.J. Dawydiak E.J. The role of denial in negative quantifier focus Journal of Memory and Language 44 2001 427-442
21. Rayner K. Carlson M. Frazier L. The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22 1983 358-374
22. Rayner K. Pollatsek A. The psychology of reading 1989 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
23. Sanford A.J. Garrod S.C. The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension Discourse Processes 26 1998 159-190
24. Sanford A.J. Lockhart F. Description types and method of conjoining as factors influencing plural anaphora: A continuation study of focus Journal of Semantics 7 1990 365-378
25. Sanford A.J. Moar K. Garrod S.C. Proper names and the control of focus Language and Speech 31 1988 43-56
26. Sanford A.J. Moxey L.M. Notes on plural reference and the scenario-mapping principle in comprehension In: Habel C. Rickheit G. (Eds.) Focus and cohesion in discourse 1995 de Gruyter Berlin
27. Schütze C.T. Gibson E. Argumenthood and English prepositional phrase attachment Journal of Memory and Language 40 1999 409-431
28. Sturt P. The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution Journal of Memory and Language 48 2003 542-562
29. Trueswell J.C. Tanenhaus M.K. Garnsey S.M. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution Journal of Memory and Language 33 1994 285-318
30. Van Gompel R.P.G. Pickering M.J. Traxler M.J. Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current constraint-based and two-stage models Journal of Memory and Language 45 2001 225-258
31. Vonk W. Hustinx L.G.M.M. Simons W.M.G. The use of referential expressions in structuring discourse Language and Cognitive Processes 7 1992 301-333
32. Winer B.J. Statistical principles in experimental design 1971 McGraw-Hill New York