In search of gender neutrality: Is Singular They a Cognitively Efficient Substitute for Generic He?

Psychological Science

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 106-111

  Foertsch, Julie ^a,b   Gernsbacher, Morton Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b LEAD Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347877152     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00691.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beardsley, E.L. (1973). Referential generalization. Philosophical Forum, 5, 285-293.
2. Bodine, A. (1975). Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular "they," sex-indefinite "he," and "he or she." Language in Society, 4, 129-146.
3. Flanagan, A.M., & Todd-Mancillas, W.R. (1982). Teaching inclusive generic pronoun usage: The effectiveness of an authority innovation-decision approach vs. optional innovation-decision approach. Communication Education, 31, 275-284.
4. Foertsch, J., & Gernsbacher, M.A. (1994). In search of complete comprehension: Getting "minimalists" to work. Discourse Processes, 18, 271-296.
5. Fowler, H.R., & Aaron, J.E. (1983). The Little, Brown handbook (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
6. Garnham, A. (1981). Anaphoric reference to instances, instantiated and non-instantiated categories: A reading time study. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 377-384.
7. Garnham, A. (1984). Effects of specificity on the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 1-12.
8. Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. (1977). Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 77-90.
9. Kerr, J.S., & Underwood, G. (1984). Fixation time on anaphoric pronouns decreases with congruity of reference. In A.G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.), Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 110-136). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
10. Khosroshahi, F. (1989). Penguins don't care, but women do: A social identity analysis of a Whorfian problem. Language in Society, 18, 505-525.
11. Kidd, V. (1971). A study of the images produced through the use of the male pronoun as the generic. Moments in Contemporary Rhetoric and Communication, 1, 25-30.
12. MacKay, D.G. (1980). On the goals, principles, and procedures for prescriptive grammar: Singular they. Language in Society, 9, 349-367.
13. MacKay, D.G., & Fulkerson, D.C. (1979). On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 661-673.
14. Martyna, W. (1978a). Using and understanding the generic masculine: A social-psychological approach to language and the sexes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
15. Martyna, W. (1978b). What does "he" mean? Journal of Communication, 28, 131-138.
16. Meyers, M. (1990). Current generic pronoun usage: An empirical study. American Speech, 65, 228-237.
17. Moulton, J., Robinson, G., & Elias, C. (1978). Sex bias in language use. American Psychologist, 33, 1032-1036.
18. Nilsen, A.P. (1984). Winning the great he/she battle. College English, 46, 151-157.
19. Silvera, J. (1980). Generic masculine words and thinking. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 3, 165-178.
20. Spencer, N.J. (1978). Can "she" and "he" coexist? American Psychologist, 33, 782-783.
21. Strunk, W., Jr., & White, E.B. (1979). The elements of style (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
22. Valian, V. (1977). Linguistics and feminism. In F. Ellison, J. English, & M. Vetterling (Eds.). Feminism and philosophy (pp. 154-166). Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.
23. Zuber, S., & Reed, A.M. (1993). The politics of grammar handbooks: Generic he and singular they. College English, 55, 515-530.