Representation and direct democracy in the United States

Representation

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 25-44

  Tolbert, Caroline J ^a   Smith, Daniel A ^b  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949102859     PISSN: 00344893     EISSN: 17494001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00344890600583743     Document Type: Article

References (166)

1. ABRAMOWITZ, ALAN. 2004. Terrorism, gay marriage, and incumbency: Explaining the Republican victory in the 2004 presidential election. The Forum 2(4): Article 3. Available online at http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol2/iss4/art3.
2. ALLSWANG, JOHN. 2000. The initiative and referendum in California, 1898-1998. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3. ALVAREZ, R. MICHAEL and L. BEDOLLA. 2004. The revolution against affirmative action in California: Racism, economics, and proposition 209. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4: 1-17.
4. ALVAREZ, R. MICHAEL and TARA BUTTERFIELD. 2000. The resurgence of nativism in California? The case of Proposition 187 and illegal immigration. Social Science Quarterly 81: 167-79.
5. ARCENEAUX, KEVIN. 2002. Direct democracy and the link between public opinion and state abortion policy. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2: 372-87.
6. BALDASSARE, MARK. 2000. California in the new millennium: The changing social and political landscape. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. BALLOT INITIATIVE STRATEGY CENTER. 2004. Election results 2004. Available online at http://ballot.org.
8. BANDUCCI, SUSAN. 1998. Direct legislation: When is it used and when does it pass? In Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States, edited by Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan and Caroline Tolbert. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
9. BARNETT, JAMES. 1915. The operation of the initiative, referendum, and recall in Oregon. New York: The Macmillan Company.
10. BATES, FRANK. 1915. Constitutional amendments and referred acts, November election 1914. American Political Science Review 9: 101-7.
11. BEARD, CHARLES and BIRL SHULTZ, eds. 1912. Documents on the state-wide initiative, referendum and recall. New York: The Macmillan Company.
12. BELL, DERRICK. 1977. The referendum: Democracy’s barrier to racial equality. Washington Law Review 54: 1-29.
13. BENZ, MATTHIAS and ALOIS STUTZER. 2004. Are voters better informed when they have a larger say in politics? Public Choice 119: 21-59.
14. BOEHMKE, FREDRICK. 2002. The effect of direct democracy on the size and diversity of state interest group populations. Journal of Politics 64: 827-44.
15. BOEHMKE, FREDRICK. 2005. The indirect effect of direct legislation: How institutions shape interest group systems. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
16. BOWLER, SHAUN and TODD DONOVAN. 1994. Economic voting and ballot propositions. American Politics Quarterly 22: 27-40.
17. BOWLER, SHAUN and TODD DONOVAN. 1995. Popular responsiveness to taxation. Political Research Quarterly 48: 79-100.
18. BOWLER, SHAUN and TODD DONOVAN. 1998. Demanding choices: Opinion and voting in direct democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
19. BOWLER, SHAUN and TODD DONOVAN. 2002a. Do voters have a cue? TV ads as a source of information in referendum voting. European Journal of Political Research 41: 777-93.
20. BOWLER, SHAUN and TODD DONOVAN. 2002b. Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government. British Journal of Political Science 32: 371-90.
21. BOWLER, SHAUN and TODD DONOVAN. 2004a. Evolution in state governance structures: Unintended consequences of state tax and expenditure limitations. Political Research Quarterly 57: 189-96.
22. BOWLER, SHAUN and TODD DONOVAN. 2004b. The initiative process. In Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis, 8th edn, edited by Virginia Gray and Russell Hanson. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 129-56.
23. BOWLER, SHAUN, TODD DONOVAN and CAROLINE TOLBERT, EDS. 1998. Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
24. BOWLER, SHAUN, STEPHEN NICHOLSON and GARYSEGURA 2006. Earthquakes and aftershocks: Race, direct democracy, and partisan change. American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 146-59.
25. BOYER, PATRICK. 1992. Direct democracy in Canada: The history and future of referendums. Toronto: Dundurn Press.
26. BOYLE, JAMES. 1912. The initiative and referendum: Its folly, fallacies, and failure, 3rd edn. Columbus, OH: A.H. Smythe.
27. BRANTON, REGINA. 2003. Examining individual-level voting behavior on state ballot propositions. Political Research Quarterly 56: 367-77.
28. BRANTON, REGINA. 2004. Voting in initiative elections: Does the context of racial and ethnic diversity matter? State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4: 294-317.
29. BRODER, DAVID. 2000. Democracy derailed: Initiative campaigns and the power of money. New York: Harcourt Brace Publishers.
30. BUDGE, IAN. 1996. The New challenge of direct democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31. BUDGE, IAN. 2002. Political parties in direct democracy. In Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites and deliberation in referendum campaigns, edited by Matthew Mendelsohn and Andrew Parkin. New York: Palgrave.
32. BURDEN, BARRY. 2004. An alternative account of the 2004 Presidential Election. The Forum 2(4): Article 2. Available online at http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol2/iss4/art2.
33. BURDEN, BARRY. 2005. Institutions and policy representation in the States. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 5: 373-93.
34. BUTLER, DAVID and AUSTIN RANNEY, eds. 1994. Referendums around the world: The growing use of direct democracy. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
35. BUTTON, JAMES W., BARBARA A. RIENZO and KENNETH D. WALD. 1997. Private lives, public conflicts: Battles over gay rights in American communities. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
36. CAIN, BRUCE. 1992. Voting rights and democratic theory: Toward a color-blind society? In Controversies in minority voting, edited by Bernard Grofman and C. Davidson. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
37. CAIN, BRUCE and KENNETH MILLER. 2001. The populist legacy: Initiatives and the undermining of representative government. in Dangerous democracy? The battle over ballot initiatives in America, edited by Larry Sabato, Bruce Larson and Howard Ernst. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
38. CAMOBRECO, JOHN. 1998. Preferences, fiscal policies, and the initiative process. Journal of Politics 60: 819-29.
39. CAMPBELL, ANNE. 2001. In the eye of the beholder: The single subject rule for ballot initiatives. In The Battle Over Citizen Lawmaking, edited by M. Dane Waters. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
40. CAMPBELL, DAVID and J. QUINN MONSON. 2005. The case of Bush’s re-election: Did gay marriage do it? Paper presented at Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 7-10.
41. CHAMBERS, SIMONE. 2001. Constitutional referendums and democratic deliberation. In Referendum Democracy, edited by Matthew Mendelsohn and Andrew Parkin. New York: Palgrave.
42. CHAVEZ, LYDIA. 1998. The color bind: California’s battle to end affirmative action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43. CHRISTIN, THOMAS and SIMON HUG. 2002. Referendums and citizen support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies 35: 586-617.
44. CITRIN, JACK, BETH REINGOLD, EVELYN WALTERS and DONALD GREEN. 1990. The ‘Official English’ movement and the symbolic politics of language in the United States. Western Political Quarterly 43: 535-60.
45. COLLINS, RICHARD. 2001. Part II: New directions in direct democracy: How democratic are initiatives? University of Colorado Law Review 72: 983-1003.
46. CRAIG, STEVEN, AMIE KREPPEL and JAMES KANE. 2001. Public opinion and direct democracy: A case study. In Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites, and deliberation in referendum campaigns, edited by Matthew Mendelsohn and Andrew Parkin. New York: Palgrave.
47. CREE, NATHAN. 1892. Direct legislation by the people. Chicago: A.C. McClurg and Co.
48. CRONIN, THOMAS. 1989. Direct democracy: The politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
49. CROUCH, WINSTON. 1950. The initiative and referendum in California. Los Angeles: The Haynes Foundation.
50. CUSHMAN, ROBERT. 1916. Recent experience with the initiative and referendum. American Political Science Review 10: 532-9.
51. DAO, JAMES. 2004. Flush with victory, grass-roots crusader against same-sex marriage thinks big. New York Times, 26 Nov: A28.
52. DONOVAN, TODD and SHAUN BOWLER. 1997. Direct democracy and minority rights: Opinions on antigay and lesbian ballot initiatives. In Anti-gay rights: Assessing voter initiatives, edited by S. Witt and S. McCorkle. Westport, CT: Praeger.
53. DONOVAN, TODD and SHAUN BOWLER. 1998a. Direct democracy and minority rights: An extension. American Journal of Political Science 43: 1020-5.
54. DONOVAN, TODD and SHAUN BOWLER. 1998b. Responsive or responsive government. In Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States, edited by Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan and Caroline Tolbert. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
55. DONOVAN, TODD and SHAUN BOWLER. 2004. Reforming the republic: Democratic institutions for the new America. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. DONOVAN, TODD, SHAUN BOWLER and DAVID MCCUAN. 2001. Political consultants and the initiative industrial complex. In Dangerous democracy? The battle over ballot initiatives in America, edited by Larry Sabato, Bruce Larson and Howard Ernst. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
57. DONOVAN, TODD, SHAUN BOWLER, DAVID MCCUAN and KENNETH FERNANDEZ. 1998. Contending players and strategies: Opposition advantages in initiative elections. In Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States, edited by Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan and Caroline Tolbert. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
58. DONOVAN, TODD and JOSEPH SNIPP. 1994. Support for legislative term limitations in California: Group representation, partisanship, and campaign information. Journal of Politics 56: 492-501.
59. DONOVAN, TODD, CAROLINE TOLBERT and DANIEL SMITH. 2005. Do state-level ballot measures affect Presidential elections? Gay marriage and the 2004 election. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
60. DONOVAN, TODD, JAMES WENZEL and SHAUN BOWLER. 2000. Direct democracy initiatives after Romer. In The politics of gay rights, edited by Craig Rimmerman, Ken Wald and Clyde Wilcox. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. ELLIS, RICHARD. 2002. Democratic delusions: The initiative process in America. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
62. FREEDMAN, PAUL. 2004. The gay marriage myth. Slate, 5 Nov. Available online at http://slate.msn.com/id/2109275/.
63. FREY, BRUNO and L. GOETTE. 1998. Does the popular vote destroy civil rights? American Journal of Political Science 41: 245-69.
64. FRIEL, BRIAN. 2004. Both sides claim ballot-issue victories. National Journal 36: 3415.
65. GAMBLE, BARBARA. 1997. Putting civil rights to a popular vote. American Journal of Political Science 41: 245-69.
66. GARRETT, ELIZABETH. 1997. Perspective on direct democracy: Who directs direct democracy? University of Chicago Law School Roundtable 4: 17-36.
67. GARRETT, ELIZABETH. 1999. Money, agenda setting, and direct democracy. Texas Law Review 77: 1845-90.
68. GARRETT, ELIZABETH. 2005 (forthcoming). Hybrid democracy. George Washington Law Review.
69. GARRETT, ELIZABETH and DANIEL SMITH. 2005. Veiled political actors and campaign disclosure laws in direct democracy. Election Law Journal 4: 295-328.
70. GARRETT, ELIZABETH and ELISABETH GERBER. 2001. Money in the initiative and referendum process: Evidence of its effects and prospects for reform. In The battle over citizen lawmaking, edited by M. Dane Waters. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
71. GERBER, ELISABETH. 1996. Legislative response to the threat of popular initiatives. American Journal of Political Science 40: 99-128.
72. GERBER, ELISABETH. 1998. Pressuring legislatures through the use of initiatives: Two forms of indirect influence. In Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States, edited by Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan and Caroline Tolbert. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
73. GERBER, ELISABETH. 1999. The populist paradox: Interest group influence and the promise of direct legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
74. GERBER, ELISABETH and SIMON HUG. 2001. Minority rights and direct legislation: Theory, method and evidence. In Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites, and deliberation in referendum campaigns, edited by Matthew Mendelsohn and Andrew Parkin. New York: Palgrave.
75. GERBER, ELISABETH and ARTHUR LUPIA. 1995. Campaign competition and policy responsiveness in direct political behavior. Political Behavior 17: 287-306.
76. GERBER, ELISABETH and ARTHUR LUPIA. 1999. Voter competence in direct legislation elections. In Democracy and citizen competence, edited by Steven Elkin and Karol Soltan. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
77. GERBER, ELISABETH, ARTHUR LUPIA and MATHEW MCCUBBINS. 2004. When does government limit the impact of voter initiatives? The politics of implementation and enforcement. Journal of Politics 66: 43-68.
78. GERBER, ELISABETH, ARTHUR LUPIA, MATHEW MCCUBBINS and RODERICK KIEWIET. 2001. Stealing the initiative. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
79. GOEBEL, THOMAS. 2002. A government by the people: Direct democracy in America, 1890-1940. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
80. GUBER, DEBORAH LYNN. 2001. Environmental voting in the American states: A tale of two initiatives. State and Local Government Review 33: 120-32.
81. HAIDER-MARKEL, DONALD. 1999. AIDS and gay civil rights: Politics and policy at the ballot box. American Review of Politics 20: 349-75.
82. HAIDER-MARKEL, DONALD. 2001. Shopping for favorable venues in the States: Institutional influences on legislative outcomes of same-sex marriage bills. American Review of Politics 22: 27-54.
83. HAIDER-MARKEL, DONALD and MARK JOSLYN. 2005. Attributions and the regulation of marriage: Considering the parallels between race and homosexuality. PS: Political Science and Politics 38(2): 233-39.
84. HAIDER-MARKEL, DONALD and KENNETH J. MEIER. 1996. The politics of gay and lesbian rights: Expanding the scope of the conflict. Journal of Politics 58: 332-49.
85. HAJNAL, ZOLTAN, ELISABETH GERBER and H. LOUCH. 2002. Minorities and direct legislation: Evidence from California ballot proposition elections. Journal of Politics 64: 154-177.
86. HASEN, RICHARD. 2000. Parties take the initiative (and vice versa). Columbian Law Review 100: 731-52.
87. HERO, RODNEY. 1998. Faces of inequality: Social diversity in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
88. HERO, RODNEY and CAROLINE TOLBERT. 1996. A racial/ethnic diversity interpretation of politics and policy in the states of the US. American Journal of Political Science 40: 851-71.
89. HERO, RODNEY and CAROLINE TOLBERT. 2004. Minority voices and citizen attitudes about government responsiveness in the American states: Do social and institutional context matter? British Journal of Political Science 34: 109-21.
90. HILLYGUS, SUNSHINE and TODD SHIELDS. 2005. Moral issues and voter decision making in the 2004 Presidential Election. PS: Political Science and Politics 38: 201-10.
91. HOFSTADTER, RICHARD. 1955. The age of reform. New York: Vintage Books.
92. HOWE, FREDERIC C. 1915. The constitution and public opinion. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science in the City of New York 5: 7-19.
93. JOHNSTON, RICHARD, ANDRE BLAIS, ELISABETH GIDENGIL and NEIL NEVITTE. 1996. The challenge of direct democracy: The 1992 Canadian referendum. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
94. KARP, JEFFREY. 1998. The Influence of Elite Endorsements in Initiative Campaigns. In Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States, edited by Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Caroline Tolbert. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
95. KOBACH, KRIS. 1993. The referendum: Direct democracy in Switzerland. Dartmouth, England: Aldershot.
96. KOUSSER, THAD and MATHEW MCCUBBINS. 2005. Social choice, crypto-initiatives, and policymaking by direct democracy. Southern California Law Review 78: 949-84.
97. LACEY, R. 2005. The electoral allure of direct democracy: The Effect of initiative salience on voting, 1990-1996. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 5(2): 168-81.
98. LASCHER, EDWARD, MICHAEL HAGEN and STEVEN ROCHLIN. 1996. Gun behind the door? Ballot initiatives, state policies and public opinion. Journal of Politics 58: 760-75.
99. LASSEN, DAVID. 2005 (in press). The effect of information on voter turnout: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Political Science 49.
100. LEDUC, LAWRENCE. 2003. The politics of direct democracy. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
101. LEWKOWICZ, MICHAEL. 2006. The effectiveness of elite cues as heuristics in proposition elections. American Politics Research 34: 51-68.
102. LINDE, HANS. 1994. On reconstructing republican government. Oklahoma City University Law Review 19: 193-211.
103. LOWENSTEIN, DANIEL. 1982. Campaign spending and ballot propositions: Recent experience, public choice theory, and the first amendment. UCLA Law Review 505: 505-641.
104. LOWY, JOAN. 2004. DNC: Dems, GOP push ballot measures to influence voters, Naples News, 29 July. Available online at http://www.naplesnews.com/npdn/news/article/0,2071, NPDN_14940_3071424,00.html.
105. LUPIA, ARTHUR. 1994. Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review 88: 63-76.
106. MADISON, JAMES. [1788] 1961. Federalist #10. In The Federalist Papers, edited by Clinton Rossiter. New York: New American Library.
107. MAGLEBY, DAVID. 1984. Direct legislation: Voting on ballot propositions in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
108. MAGLEBY, DAVID and KELLY PATTERSON. 1998. Consultants and direct democracy. PS: Political Science and Politics 31: 160-9.
109. MARSCHALL, MELLISSA and ANIRUDH RUHIL. 2005. Fiscal effects of the voter initiative reconsidered: addressing endogeneity. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 5: 327-55.
110. MATSUSAKA, JOHN. 1995. Fiscal effects of the voter initiative: Evidence from the last 30 years. Journal of Political Economy 103: 587-623.
111. MATSUSAKA, JOHN. 2001. Problems with a methodology used to evaluate the voter initiative. Journal of Politics 63: 1250-6.
112. MATSUSAKA, JOHN. 2004. For the many or the few: The initiative, public policy, and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
113. MATSUSAKA, JOHN. 2005. Direct democracy works. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 185-206.
114. MATTSON, KEVIN. 1998. Creating a democratic public: The struggle for urban participatory democracy during the Progressive Era. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
115. MCCUAN, DAVID, SHAUN BOWLER, TODD DONOVAN and KEN FERNANDEZ. 1998. California’s political warriors: Campaign professionals and the initiative process. In Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States, edited by Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan and Caroline Tolbert. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
116. MENDELSOHN, MATTHEW and ANDREW PARKIN, eds. 2001. Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites, and deliberation in referendum campaigns. New York: Palgrave.
117. MENDELSOHN, MATTHEW and FRED CUTLER. 2000. The effect of referenda on democratic citizens: Information, politicization, efficacy and tolerance. British Journal of Political Science 30: 669-98.
118. MUNRO, WILLIAMB., ed. 1912. The Initiative, referendum, and recall. New York: Appleton and Co.
119. NEW, MICHAEL. 2001. Limiting government through direct democracy: The case of state tax and expenditure limitations. In Cato Institute, Policy Analysis, December 13. Available online at http://www.cato.org.
120. NICHOLSON, STEVEN. 2003. The political environment and ballot proposition awareness. American Journal of Political Science 47: 403-10.
121. NICHOLSON, STEVEN. 2005. Voting the agenda: Candidates elections and ballot propositions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university Press.
122. NORQUIST, GROVER. 1993. Prelude to a landslide: How Republicans will sweep the Congress. Policy Review (Heritage Foundation) 66: 30-35.
123. PIOTT, STEVEN. 2003. Giving voters a voice: The origins of the initiative and referendum in America. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
124. PIPPEN, J., SHAUN BOWLER and TODD DONOVAN. 2002. Election reform and direct democracy: The case of campaign finance regulations in the American states. American Politics Research 30: 559-82.
125. PRICE, CHARLES. 1975. The initiative: A comparative state analysis and reassessment of a western phenomenon. Western Political Quarterly 28: 243-62.
126. QVORTRUP, MATT. 2002. A comparative study of referendums: Government by the people. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
127. SCHMIDT, DAVID. 1989. Citizen lawmakers: The ballot initiative revolution. Philadelphia, PA: Temple university Press.
128. SCHRAG, PETER. 1996. Take the initiative, please. The American Prospect, 1 Oct, pp. 1-3.
129. SCHRAG, PETER. 1998. Paradise lost: California’s experience, America’s future. New York: New Press.
130. SEARS, DAVID and JACK CITRIN. 1982. Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university Press.
131. SHOCKLEY, JOHN. 1983. Money in politics: Judicial roadblocks to campaign finance reform. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 10: 679-92.
132. SHOCKLEY, JOHN. 1985. Direct democracy, campaign finance and the courts: Can corruption, undue influence, and declining voter confidence be found? University of Miami Law Review 39: 377-428.
133. SMITH, DANIEL. 1998. Tax crusaders and the politics of direct democracy. New York: Routledge.
134. SMITH, DANIEL. 2001a. Campaign financing of ballot initiatives in the American States. In Dangerous democracy? The battle over ballot initiatives in America, edited by Larry Sabato, Bruce Larson and Howard Ernst. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
135. SMITH, DANIEL. 2001b. Special interests and direct democracy: An historical glance. In The battle over citizen lawmaking, edited by M. Dane Waters. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
136. SMITH, DANIEL. 2001c. Homeward bound? Micro-Level legislative responsiveness to ballot initiatives. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1: 50-61.
137. SMITH, DANIEL. 2003a. Overturning term limits: The legislature’s own private Idaho? PS: Political Science and Politics 36: 215-20.
138. SMITH, DANIEL. 2003b. Ballot initiatives and the (sub)urban/rural divide in Colorado. In Colorado’s future: Meeting the needs of a changing state, edited by Daphne T. Greenwood. Colorado Springs, CO: Center for Colorado Policy Studies.
139. SMITH, DANIEL. 2004. Peeling away the populist rhetoric: Toward a taxonomy of anti-tax ballot initiatives. Public Budgeting and Finance 24: 88-110.
140. SMITH, DANIEL A., MATTHEW DESANTIS and JASON KASSEL. 2006. Same-Sex Marriage Ballot Measures and the 2004 Presidential Election. State and Local Government Review 38(2).
141. SMITH, DANIEL and ROBERT HERRINGTON. 2000. The process of direct democracy: Colorado’s 1996 parental rights amendment. Social Science Journal 37: 179-94.
142. SMITH, DANIEL and JOSEPH LUBINSKI. 2002. Direct democracy during the Progressive Era: A crack in the populist veneer? Journal of Policy History 14: 349-83.
143. SMITH, DANIEL and CAROLINE TOLBERT. 2001. The initiative to party: Partisanship and ballot initiatives in California. Party Politics 7: 738-57.
144. SMITH, DANIEL and CAROLINE TOLBERT. 2004. Educated by initiative: The effects of direct democracy on citizens and political organizations in the American states. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
145. SMITH, MARK. 2001. The contingent effects of ballot initiatives and candidate races on turnout. American Journal of Political Science 45: 700-6.
146. SMITH, MARK. 2002. Ballot initiatives and the democratic citizen. Journal of Politics 64: 892-903.
147. SULLIVAN, JAMES. 1892. Direct legislation by the citizenship through the initiative and referendum. New York: True Nationalist Publishing Co.
148. TOLBERT, CAROLINE. 1998. Changing rules for state legislatures: Direct democracy and governance policies. In Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States, edited by Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan and Caroline Tolbert. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
149. TOLBERT, CAROLINE. 2001. Public policy and direct democracy. In The battle over citizen lawmaking, edited by M. Dane Waters. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
150. TOLBERT, CAROLINE. 2003. Cycles of democracy: Direct democracy and institutional realignment in the American states. Political Science Quarterly 118(3): 467-89.
151. TOLBERT, CAROLINE and JOHN GRUMMEL. 2003. White voter support for California’s Proposition 209: Revisiting the racial threat hypothesis. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3: 183-202.
152. TOLBERT, CAROLINE, JOHN GRUMMEL and DANIEL SMITH. 2001. The effects of ballot initiatives on voter turnout in the American states. American Politics Research 29: 625-48.
153. TOLBERT, CAROLINE and RODNEY HERO. 1996. Race/ethnicity and direct democracy: An analysis of California’s illegal immigration initiative. Journal of Politics 58: 806-18.
154. TOLBERT, CAROLINE and RODNEY HERO. 2001. Facing diversity: Racial/ethnic context and social policy change. Political Research Quarterly 54: 571-604.
155. TOLBERT, CAROLINE, DANIEL LOWENSTEIN and TODD DONOVAN. 1998. Election law and rules for using initiatives. In Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States, edited by Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan and Caroline Tolbert. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
156. TOLBERT, CAROLINE, RAMONA MCNEAL and DANIEL SMITH. 2003. Enhancing civic engagement: The effect of direct democracy on political participation and knowledge. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3: 23-41.
157. TOLBERT, CAROLINE and DANIEL SMITH. 2005. The educative effects of ballot initiatives on voter turnout. American Politics Research 33: 283-309.
158. TOLBERT, CAROLINE and GERTRUDE STEUERNAGEL. 2003. Race/ethnicity and referenda on redistributive health care. In Race, welfare, and the politics of reform, edited by R. Fording, J. Soss and S. Schram. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
159. ULFERTS, ALLISON. 2003. Lawmakers want hard road for initiatives. St Petersburg Times, 9 Dec.
160. WATERS, M. DANE, ed. 2001. The battle over citizen lawmaking. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
161. WATERS, M. DANE, ed. 2003. The Initiative and Referendum Almanac. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
162. WENZEL, JAMES, TODD DONOVAN and SHAUN BOWLER. 1998. Direct democracy and minorities: Changing attitudes about minorities targeted by initiatives. In Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States, edited by Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan and Caroline Tolbert. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
163. WILCOX, DELOS. 1912. Government by all the people (or The initiative, the referendum and the recall as instruments of democracy). New York: The Macmillan Company.
164. WITT, STEPHANIE L. and SUZANNE MCCORKEL. 1997. Anti-gay rights: Assessing voter initiatives. Westport, CT: Praeger.
165. ZIMMERMAN, JOSEPH. 1999. The initiative: Citizen law-making. Westport, CT: Praeger.
166. ZISK, BETTY. 1987. Money, media, and the grass roots: State ballot issues and the electoral process. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.