The Revolution against Affirmative Action in California: Racism, Economics, and Proposition 209

State Politics and Policy Quarterly

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-17

  Alvarez, R Michael ^a   Bedolla, Lisa García ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644988131     PISSN: 15324400     EISSN: 19461607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/153244000400400101     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alvarez R. MichaelInformation and Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1998:
2. Alvarez R. Michael,Glasgow Garrett.Two-Stage Estimation of Nonrecursive Choice Models.Political Analysis. 2000;8:147-65
3. Alvarez R. Michael,Brehm John.Are Americans Ambivalent Towards Racial Policies?.American Journal of Political Science. 1997;41:345-76
4. Alvarez R. Michael,Nagler Jonathan.Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election.American Journal of Political Science. 1995;39:714-44
5. Alvarez R. Michael,Nagler Jonathan.When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multicandidate Elections.American Journal of Political Science. 1998;42:1349-63
6. Alvarez R. Michael,Butterfield Tara L.The Resurgence of Nativism in California? The Case of Proposition 187 and Illegal Immigration.Social Science Quarterly. 2000;81:167-79
7. Baldassare MarkCalifornia in the New Millennium: The Changing Social and Political Landscape. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2000:
8. Bobo Lawrence,Hutchings Vincent L.Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer's Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context.American Sociological Review. 1996;61:951-72
9. Bowler Shaun,Donovan ToddDemanding Choices: Opinion, Voting and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1998:
10. Bowler Shaun,Donovan Todd,Happ Trudi.Ballot Propositions and Information Costs: Direct Democracy and the Fatigued Voter.Western Political Quarterly. 1992;45:559-68
11. Chavez LydiaThe Color Bind. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1998:
12. DeckerCathleenBarabakMark. 1997. “After Years of Upheaval, a Time of Contentment,” The Los Angeles Times, 21 October, online edition.
13. Democratic National Committee. 1997. Affirmative Action. Position paper. Washington, DC.
14. Glasgow Garrett.Mixed Logit Models for Multiparty Elections.Political Analysis. 2001;9:116-36
15. Green Donald P.,Strolovitch Dara Z.,Wong Janelle S.Defended Neighborhoods, Integration and Racially Motivated Crime.American Journal of Sociology. 1998;104:372-403
16. Guerrero M. A. Jaime.Affirmative Action: Race, Class, Gender, and NOW.American Behavioral Scientist. 1997;41:246-55
17. Hajnal Zoltan L.,Gerber Elisabeth R.,Louch Hugh.Minorities and Direct Legislation: Evidence from California Ballot Proposition Elections.Journal of Politics. 2002;64:154-77
18. Hill-HoltzmanNancy. 1996. “Valley's Pro-209 Vote at Odds with City, County.” The Los Angeles Times, 9 November, online edition.
19. Key V.O.Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Vintage; 1949:
20. Kinder Donald R.,Sanders Lynn M.The Continuing American Dilemma: White Resistance to Racial Change 40 Years after Myrdal.Journal of Social Issues. 1996;42:151-71
21. Kinder Donald R.,Mendelberg Tali.Cracks in American Apartheid: The Political Impact of Prejudice among Desegregated Whites.Journal of Politics. 1995;57:402-24
22. KrysanMaria. 1995. “White Racial Attitudes: Does It Matter How We Ask?” Ph.D. diss. University of Michigan.
23. Kuklinski James H.,Sniderman Paul M.,Knight Kathleen,Piazza Thomas,Tetlock Philip E.,Lawrence Gordon R.,Mellers Barbara.Racial Prejudice and Attitudes toward Affirmative Action.American Journal of Political Science. 1997;41:402-19
24. Lupia Arthur.Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.American Political Science Review. 1994;88:63-76
25. Magleby David B.Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1984:
26. McConahay John B.Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism: Theory and Research. Dovidio J.Gaertner S.L., ed. New York: Academic Press; 1986:
27. Oliver Eric J.,Mendelberg Tali.Reconsidering the Environmental Determinants of White Racial Attitudes.American Journal of Political Science. 2000;44:574-89
28. Popkin Samuel L.The Reasoning Voter: Communications and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991:
29. Republican National Committee. 1996. 1996 Republican Party Platform. Washington, DC.
30. Smith Daniel A.,Tolbert Caroline J.The Initiative to Party: Partisanship and Ballot Initiatives in California.Party Politics. 2001;7:739-57
31. Sniderman Paul M.,Hagen and M.Race and Inequality. New York: Chatham House; 1985:
32. Sniderman Paul M.,Piazza ThomasThe Scar of Race. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press; 1993:
33. Steeh Charlotte,Krysan Maria.The Polls—Trends: Affirmative Action and the Public 1970–1995.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1996;60:128-58
34. Sudman Seymour,Bradburn Norman M.Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. New York: Jossey-Bass; 1982:
35. Tolbert Caroline J.,Hero Rodney E.Dealing with Diversity: Racial/Ethnic Context and Social Policy Change.Political Research Quarterly. 2001;54:571-604
36. Voss D. Stephen.Beyond Racial Threat: Failure of an Old Hypothesis in the New South.Journal of Politics. 1996;58:1156-70
37. VOTER NEWS SERVICE GENERAL ELECTION EXIT POLLS, 1996 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. New York, NY: Voter News Service; 1997:1996.