Election reform and direct democracy: Campaign finance regulations in the American States

American Politics Research

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 559-582

  Pippen, John ^a   Bowler, Shaun ^a   Donovan, Todd ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036403699     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/153267302237228     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bell, D. A., Jr. (1978). The referendum: Democracy's barrier to racial equality. Washington Law Review, 54, 1-29.
2. Benjamin, G., & Malbin, M. (1992). Limiting legislative terms. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
3. Bibby, J., Cotter, C., Gibson, J., & Huckshorn, R. (1990). Parties in state politics. In V. Gray, H. Jacob, & R. Albritton (Eds.), Politics in the American states (5th ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
4. Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Tolbert, C. (1998). Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States. Columbus: Ohio State University.
5. Broder, D. S. (2000). Democracy derailed: Initiative campaigns and the power of money. New York: Harvest Books.
6. Burnham, W. D. (1970). Critical elections and the mainsprings of American politics. New York: Norton.
7. Cain, B., & Gerber, E. (2002). Voting at the political fault line: California's experiment with the blanket primary. Berkeley: IGS/University of California Press.
8. Camobreco, J. (1998). Preferences, fiscal policies and the initiative process. Journal of Politics, 60(3), 819-829.
9. Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
10. Council of State Governments. (1985). The book of the states (Vol. 27). Lexington, KY: Author.
11. Council of State Governments. (1999). The book of the states (Vol. 34). Lexington, KY: Author.
12. Dwyre, D., O'Gorman, M. Stonecash, J. M., & Young, R. (1994). Disorganized politics and the have-nots: Politics and taxes in New York and California. Polity, 28, 25-47.
13. Ellis, R. (2002). Democratic delusions: The initiative process in America. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
14. Eule, J. (1990). Judicial review of direct democracy. Yale Law Journal, 99, 1504.
15. Gamble, B. (1997). Direct democracy and civil liberties. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 66-80.
16. Gerber, E. (1996a). Legislative response to the threat of popular initiative. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 99-128.
17. Gerber, E. (1996b). Legislatures, initiatives, and representation: The effects of state legislative institutions on policy. Political Research Quarterly, 49, 163-286.
18. Gerber, E. (1999). The populist paradox: Interest group influence and the promise of direct democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Gerber, E., & Lupia, A. (1995). Campaign competition and policy responsiveness in direct legislation elections. Political Behavior, 17, 287-306.
20. Gray, V., & Lowery, D. (1996). The population ecology of interest representation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21. Hayes, S. P. (1964). The politics of reform in municipal government in the Progressive Era. Pacific Northwest Quarterly, 55, 157-169.
22. Hofstadter, R. (1955). The age of reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. New York: Vintage.
23. Lascher, E., Hagen, M., & Rochlin, S. (1996). Gun behind the door? Ballot initiatives, state policies and public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58, 760-775.
24. Magleby, D. B. (1984). Direct legislation: Voting on ballot propositions in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Magleby, D. B. (1994). Direct legislation in the American states. In D. Butler & A. Ranney (Eds.), Referendums around the world. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
26. Marcus, G. (1979). Analysis of panel data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Matsusaka, J. (1995). Fiscal effects of voter initiatives: Evidence from the last 30 years. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 587-623.
28. Meier, K., & Holbrook, T. (1992). I seen my opportunities and took 'em: Political corruption in the American states. Journal of Politics, 54, 120-134.
29. Miller, K. P. (1999, August). The role of courts in the initiative process: A search for standards. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association meeting, Atlanta, GA.
30. Neal, T. (1993). The voter initiative (Legisbrief.1[38]). Denver, CO: National Conference Of State Legislatures.
31. Romer, T., & Rosenthal, H. (1979). Bureaucrats versus voters: On the political economy of resource allocation by direct democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, 563-587.
32. Sabato, L., Enrnst, H., & Larsen, B. (2001). Dangerous democracy: The battle over ballot initiatives in America. Latham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
33. Smith, D. (1999). Tax crusaders and the politics of direct democracy. New York: Routledge.
34. Squire, P. (2000). Uncontested seats in state legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 131-146.
35. Thompson, J., Moncreif, G., & Alexander, H. (1997). Campaign finance in state elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
36. Tolbert, C. J. (1998). Changing rules for state legislatures: Direct democracy and governance policies. In S. Bowler, T. Donovan, & C. Tolbert (Eds.), Citizens as legislators (pp. 171-190). Columbus: Ohio State University.
37. Tolbert, C. J., Lowenstein, D. H., & Donovan, T. (1998). Election law and rules for using initiatives. In S. Bowler, T. Donovan, & C. Tolbert (Eds.), Citizens as legislators (pp. 27-54). Columbus: Ohio State University.
38. Wright, G. C., Erikson, R. S., & McIver, J. P. (1985). Measuring state partisanship and ideology with survey data. Journal of Politics, 47, 469-489.