Homeward Bound?: Micro-Level Legislative Responsiveness to Ballot Initiatives

State Politics and Policy Quarterly

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 50-61

  Smith, Daniel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038770246     PISSN: 15324400     EISSN: 19461607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/153244000100100104     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barnett JamesThe Operation of the Initiative, Referendum, and Recall in Oregon. New York: MacMillan Co; 1915:
2. Beard CharlesDocuments on the Statewide Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. New York: MacMillan Co; 1912:
3. Berkman Michael,O’Connor Robert.Do Women Legislators Matter? Female Legislators and State Abortion Policy.American Politics Quarterly. 1993;21:102-24
4. Bowler Shaun,Donovan ToddDemanding Choices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1998:
5. Camobreco John.Preferences, Fiscal Policies, and the Initiative Process.Journal of Politics. 1998;60:819-29
6. Cronin ThomasDirect Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1989:
7. Cronin Thomas,Loevy RobertColorado Politics and Government. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1993:
8. Davidson RogerThe Role of the Congressman. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill; 1969:
9. Donovan Todd,Bowler ShaunThe Politics of Gay Rights. Rimmerman CraigWald KennethWilcox Clyde, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1999:
10. Donovan Todd,Bowler ShaunCitizens as Legislators. Bowler ShaunDonovan ToddTolbert Caroline, ed. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 1998a:
11. Donovan Todd,Bowler Shaun.Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: An Extension.American Journal of Political Science. 1998b;42:1020-24
12. Donovan Todd,Bowler ShaunCitizens as Legislators. Bowler ShaunDonovan ToddTolbert Caroline, ed. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 1998c:
13. ElofsonStan. 2000. Initiatives and Referenda in the 1990s—An Update of Their Use. Issue Brief. Denver: Colorado Legislative Council Staff.
14. Erikson Robert,Wright Gerald,McIver JohnStatehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993:
15. FairbankRob. 1999. Colorado state representative. Personal interview. March 4.
16. Fenno RichardHome Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown; 1978:
17. Gamble Barbara.Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote.American Journal of Political Science. 1997;91:245-69
18. Gerber Elisabeth.Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.American Journal of Political Science. 1996;40:99-128
19. Gerber ElisabethCitizens as Legislators. Bowler ShaunDonovan ToddTolbert Caroline, ed. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 1998:
20. Gerber ElisabethThe Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1999:
21. Haider-Markel Donald.Morality Policy and Individual-level Political Behavior: The Case of Legislative Voting on Lesbian and Gay Issues.Policy Studies Journal. 1999;22:735-49
22. Haider-Markel Donald,Meier Kenneth.The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of Conflict.Journal of Politics. 1996;58:332-49
23. Holbrook Thomas,Van Dunk Emily.Electoral Competition in the American States.American Political Science Review. 1993;87:955-62
24. Kesselheim Alan.Montana: State Senate says voters weren’t very smart.High Country News. 1999;31 (March 15): 6
25. LambornDoug. 1999. Colorado state senator. Personal interview. March 2.
26. Lascher Edward,Hagen Michael,Rochlin Steven.Gun Behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion.Journal of Politics. 1996;58:760-75
27. LeybaGloria. 1999. Colorado state representative. E-mail correspondence. May 18.
28. Magleby DavidDirect Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1984:
29. Malbin Michael,Benjamin GeraldLimiting Legislative Terms. Malbin MichaelBenjamin Gerald, ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 1992:
30. Matsusaka John.Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative: Evidence from the Last 30 Years.Journal of Political Economy. 1995;103:587-623
31. Mayhew DavidCongress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1974:
32. The Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Munro William, ed. New York: Appleton and Co; 1912:
33. Pitkin HannaThe Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1967:
34. Rohrlich, 1999. Calls for Prop. 13 Revisions Gain Momentum,Los Angeles Times (online edition), March 14.
35. Rosenthal AlanThe Decline of Representative Democracy. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 1998:
36. Schmidt DavidCitizen Lawmakers: The Ballot Initiative Revolution. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1989:
37. Schrag PeterParadise Lost: California’s Experience, America’s Future. New York: The New Press; 1998:
38. Smith DanielTax Crusaders and the Politics of Direct Democracy. New York: Routledge; 1998:
39. Smith Daniel,Herrington Robert.The Process of Direct Democracy: Colorado’s 1996 Parental Rights Amendment.Social Science Journal. 2000;37:179-94
40. Stimson James,MacKuen Michael,Erikson Robert.Dynamic Representation.American Political Science Review. 1995;89:543-65
41. Thomas Sue.The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.Journal of Politics. 1991;53:958-75
42. Thomas Sue,Welch Susan.The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislators.Western Political Quarterly. 1991;44:445-56
43. Tolbert CarolineCitizens as Legislators. Bowler ShaunDonovan ToddTolbert Caroline, ed. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 1998:
44. Tolbert Caroline,Hero Rodney.Race/Ethnicity and Direct Democracy: An Analysis of California’s Illegal Immigration Initiative.Journal of Politics. 1996;58:806-18
45. Tolbert Caroline,Lowenstein Daniel,Donovan ToddCitizens as Legislators. Bowler ShaunDonovan ToddTolbert Caroline, ed. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 1998:
46. Wilcox DelosGovernment by All the People. New York: MacMillan Co; 1912:
47. Wlezien Christopher.The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.American Journal of Political Science. 1995;39:981-1000
48. Zax Jeffrey.Initiatives and Government Expenditures.Public Choice. 1989;63:267-77