Maximum gene-support tree

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Volumn 2008, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 181-191

  Shan, Yunfeng ^a,b   Li, Xiu Qing ^a  

^a FREDERICTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

^b DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Gene evolution; Genome; Molecular phylogeny; True tree

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL DNA; PLANT DNA; VIRUS DNA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; ASPEN; BACULOVIRUS; CANDIDA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; FOSSIL; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GINKGO BILOBA; LOBLOLLY PINE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NEIGHBOR JOINING METHOD; NONHUMAN; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PROBABILITY; RICE; SACCHAROMYCES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPRUCE; VALIDATION STUDY; WHEAT;

EID: 44849109358     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11769343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Archibald, J.M. and Roger, A.J. 2002. Gene conversion and the evolution of euryarchaeal chaperonins: A maximum likelihood-based method for detecting conflicting phylogenetic signals. J. Mol. Evol., 55:232-45.
2. Ayala, F.J., Barrio, E. and Kwiatowski, J. 1996. Molecular clock or erratic evolution? A tale of two genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 93:11729-34.
3. Baldauf, S.L., Roger, A.J., Wenk-Siefert, I. and Doolittle, W.F. 2000. A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science, 290:972-7.
4. Campbell, N.A. 1993. Biology. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc., Redwood City, California.
5. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
6. De Queiroz, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). System. Biol., 42:368-72.
7. Doolittle, W.F. 1999. Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science, 284:2124-8.
8. Doyle, J.J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. System. Bot., 17:144-63.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1989. PHYLIP - Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics, 5:164-6.
10. Fitz-Gibbon, S.T. and House, C.H. 1999. Whole genome-based phylogenetic analysis of free-living microorganisms. Nucl. Acids Res., 27:4218-22.
11. Gadagkar, S.R., Rosenberg, M.S. and Kumar, S. 2005. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: Concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. J Exp. Zool. Part B: Mol. Dev. Evol., 304:64-74.
12. Herniou, E.A., Luque, T., Chen, X., Vlak, J.M., Winstanley, D., Cory, J.S. and O'Reilly, D.R. 2001. Use of whole genome sequence data to infer baculovirus phylogeny. J. Virol., 75:8117-26.
13. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Bull, J.J. and Cunningham, C.W. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol., 11: 152-8.
14. Kluge, A.G. 1989. A concern for evidence, and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes) System. Zool., 38:7-25.
15. Logares, R., Rengefors, K., Kremp, A., Shalchian-Tabrizi, K., Boltovskoy, A., Tengs, T, Shurtleff, A. and Klaveness, D. 2007. Phenotypically different microalgal morphospecies with identical ribosomal DNA: A case of rapid adaptive evolution? Microbial Ecol., 53:549-61.
16. McClintock, B. 1984. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science, 226:792-801.
17. Miyamoto, M.M. and Fitch, W.M. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. System. Biol., 44:64-76.
18. Panchen, A.L. 1992. Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
19. Philippe, H., Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H. and Lartillot N. 2005. Phylogenomics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. System, 36:541-62.
20. Phillips, M.J., Delsuc, F. and Penny, D. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol., 21:1455-8.
21. Rokas, A., Williams, B.I., King, N. and Carroll, S.B. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature, 425:798-804.
22. Robinson, D.R. and Foulds, L.R. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci., 53:131-47.
23. Russo, C.A.M., Takezaki, N. and Nei, M. 1996. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol., 13:525-36.
24. Sanderson, M.J., Purvis, A. and Henze, C. 1998. Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. Trends Ecol. Evol., 13:105-9.
25. Semple, C. and Steel, M. 2000. A supertree method for rooted trees. Discr. Appl. Math., 105:147-58.
26. Simpson, A.G.B., Inagaki, Y. and Roger, A.J. 2006. Comprehensive multigene phylogenies of excavate protists reveal the evolutionary positions of "primitive" eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol., 23:615-25.
27. Soltis, D.E., Albert, V.A., Savolainen, V., Hilu, K., Qiu, Y.L., Chase, M.W, Farris, J.S., Stefanovic, S., Rice, D.W., Palmer, J.D. and Soltis, P.S. 2004. Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and 'ending incongruence': A cautionary tale in phylogenetics. Trends Plant Sci., 9:477-83.
28. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
29. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeamnougin, F. and Higgins, D.G. 1997. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl. Acids Res., 25:4876-82.
30. Vuli, M., Lenski, R.E. and Radman, M. 1999. Mutation, recombination, and incipient speciation of bacteria in the laboratory. Evolution, 96:7348-51.
31. Wiley, E.O., Siegel-Causey, D., Brooks, D.R. and Funk, V.A. 1991. The Compleat cladist: A primer of phylogenetic procedures. Univ. Kansas Press, Museum Nat. Hist., Special Publication no. 19:1-158.
32. Wolf, Y.I., Rogozin, I.B., Grishin, N.V. and Koonin E.V. 2002. Genome trees and the tree of life. Trends Genet., 18:472-9.
33. Yang, Z. 1996. Maximum - likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol., 42:587-96.