Principles and Methods of Docking and Ligand Design

Structural Bioinformatics

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 441-476

  Krumrine, Jennifer ^a   Raubacher, Florian ^a   Brooijmans, Natasja ^a   Kuntz, Irwin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Analog based design; Docking and ligand design; Genotype related drug responses

Indexed keywords

DRUG RESPONSE; LIGAND DESIGN;

LIGANDS;

EID: 4444368616     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0471721204.ch22     Document Type: Chapter

References (131)

1. Al-Lazikani B, Jung J, Xiang Z, Honig B (2001): Protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Chem Biol 5(1):51-6.
2. Apostolakis J, Pluckthun A, Caflisch A (1998): Docking small ligands in flexible binding sites. J Comp Chem 19(1):21-37.
3. Aqvist J, Medina C, Samuelsson J-E (1994): A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. Protein Eng 7(3):385-91.
4. Aqvist J, T, Hansson (1996): On the validity of electrostatic linear response in polar solvents. J Phys Chem A 100:9512-21.
5. Atkins PW (1995): Physical Chemistry, 6th ed. New York: W H Freeman.
6. Bader RFW (1994): Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Bahar I, Erman B, Jernigan RL, Atilgan AR, Covell DG (1999): Collective motions in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: examination of flexibility and enzyme function. J Mol Biol 285:1023-37.
8. Banks JL, Kaminski GA, Zhou RH, Mainz DT, Berne BJ, Friesner RA (1999): Parametrizing a polarizable force field from ab initio data. I. The fluctuating point charge model. J Chem Phys 110(2):741-54.
9. Baxter CA, Murray CW, Waszkowycz B, Young SS (1998): Flexible docking using tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity. Proteins 33:367-82.
10. Bayly CI, Cieplak P, Cornell WD, Kollman PA (1993): A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESPmodel. J Phys Chem 97:10269-80.
11. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, Hermans J (1981): Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. In: Pullman B, editor. Intermolecular Forces, Reidel:Dordrecht: pp 331-42.
12. Betts MJ, Sternberg MJE (1999): An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. Protein Eng 12(4):271-83.
13. Bissantz C, Folkers G, Rognan D (2000): Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J Med Chem 43:4759-67.
14. Blaney JM, Martin EJ (1997): Computational approaches for combinatorial library design and molecular diversity analysis. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1:54-9.
15. Bogan AA, Thorn KS (1998): Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 280(1):1-9.
16. Bohacek RS, McMartin C (1994): Multiple highly diverse structures complementary to enzyme binding sites: results of extensive application of de novo design method incorporating combinatorial grow. J Am Chem Soc 116:5560-71.
17. Bohm H-J (1994): The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 8:243-56.
18. Bohm H-J, Stahl M (2000): Structure-based library design: molecular modelling merges with combinatorial chemistry. Curr Opin Chem Biol 4:283-6.
19. Borjesson U, Hunenberger PH (2001): Explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulation at constant pH: methodology and application to small amines. J Chem Phys 114(22):9706-19.
20. Breneman CM, Wiberg KB (1990): CHELPG. J Comp Chem 11:361-73.
21. CAPRI: Critical Assessment of Prediction of Interactions, http://capri.ebi.ac.uk.2001.
22. Case DA (1994): Normal mode analysis of protein dynamics. Curr Opin Struc Biol 4:285-90.
23. Charifson PS, Kuntz ID (1997): Recent successes and continuing limitations in computer-aided drug design. In: Charifson PS, editor. Practical Application of Computer-Aided Drug Design. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp 1-37.
24. Charifson PS, Corkery JJ, Murcko MA, Walters WP (1999): Consensus scoring: a method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J Med Chem 42:5100-9. [Comparison of different scoring functions.]
25. Cieplak P, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA (2001): Molecular mechanics models for organic and biological systems going beyond the atom centered two body additive approximation: aqueous solution free energies of methanol and N-methyl acetamide, nucleic acid base, and amide hydrogen bonding and chloroform/water partition coefficients of the nucleic acid bases. J Comp Chem 22(10):1048-57.
26. Clark DE, Murray CW, Li J (1997): Current issues in de novo molecular design. In:Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB, editor. Reviews in Computational Chemistry. New York: Wiley-VCH, pp 66-125.
27. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Jr, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA (1995): A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117:5179-97.
28. David L, Luo R, Gilson MK (2000): Comparison of generalized Born and Poisson models:energetics and dynamics of HIV protease. J Comp Chem 21:295-309.
29. David L, Luo R, Gilson MK (2001): Ligand-receptor docking with the Mining Minima optimizer. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 15:157-71.
30. Davis ME, Madura JD, Luty BA, McCammon JA (1991): Electrostatics and diffusion of molecules in solution: simulations with the University of Houston Brownian Dynamics program. Comput Physics Commun 62:187-97.
31. Diller DJ, Merz KM, Jr, (2001): High throughput docking for library design and library prioritization. Proteins 43:113-24.
32. Eisen MB, Wiley DC, Karplus M (1994): HOOK: a program for finding novel molecular architectures that satisfy the chemical and steric requirements of a macromolecule binding site. Proteins 19:199-221.
33. Ewing TJA, Kuntz ID (1997): Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening. J Comp Chem 18:1175-89.
34. Ewing TJA, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID (2001): DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 15:411-28.
35. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE (1997): Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics, and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 272:106-20.
36. Gallop MA, Barrett RW, Dower WJ, Fodor SPA, Gordon EM (1994): Applications of combinatorial technologies to drug discovery. 1. Background and peptide combinatorial libraries. J Med Chem 39(9):1233-51.
37. Gasteiger J, Marsili M (1980): Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity-rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 36:3219-88.
38. Gohlke H, Klebe G (2001): Statistical potentials and scoring functions applied to protein-ligand binding. Curr Opin Struc Biol 11:231-5.
39. Goodford PJ (1985): A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J Med Chem 28:849-57.
40. Gordon EM, Barrett RW, Dower WJ, Fodor SPA, Gallop MA (1994): Applications of combinatorial technologies to drug discovery. 2. Combinatorial organic synthesis, library screening strategies, and future directions. J Med Chem 37(10):1385-1401.
41. Grant AJ, Pickup BT, Nicholls A (2001): A smooth permittivity function for Poisson-Boltzmann solvation models. J Comp Chem 22(6):608-40.
42. Gschwend DA, Good AC, Kuntz ID (1996a) Molecular docking towards drug discovery. J Mol Recognit 9:175-86.
43. Gschwend DA, Kuntz ID (1996b) Orientational sampling and rigid-body minimization in molecular docking revisited: on-the-fly optimization and degeneracy removal. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 10:123-32.
44. Guener O, editor. (2000): Pharmacophore Perception, Development, and Use in Drug Design. La Jolla, CA: International University Line USA.
45. Ha S, Andreani R, Robbins A, Muegge I (2000): Evaluation of docking/scoring approaches: a comparative study based on MMP3 inhibitors. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 14:435-48.
46. Hammet LP (1970): Physical Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Hansch C, Leo A, Hoekman DH (1995): Exploring QSAR. ACS Professional Reference Book, Vol. I and II. New York: Oxford University Press USA.
48. Head MS, Given JA, Gilson MK (1997): "Mining minima": direct computation of conformational free energies. J Phys Chem A 101:1609-18.
49. Helms V, Wade RC (1998): Computational alchemy to calculate absolute protein-ligand binding free energy. J Am Chem Soc 120:2710-3.
50. Hendsch ZS, Jonsson T, Sauer RT, Tidor B (1996): Protein stabilization by removal of unsatisfied polar groups: computational approaches and experimental tests. Biochemistry 35(24):7621-5.
51. Hill TL (1986): An Introduction to Statistical Thermodynamics. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
52. Honig B, Nicholls A (1995): Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science 268:1144-9. [Review of electrostatic contributions to solvation and binding free energies.]
53. Jakalian A, Bush BL, Jack DB, Bayly CI (2000): Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method. J Comp Chem 21(2):132-46.
54. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC (1995): Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J Mol Biol 245:43-53.
55. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R (1997): Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol 267:727-48.
56. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW (1983): Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926-35.
57. Juffer AH, Eisenhaber F, Hubbard SJ, Walther D, Argos P (1995): Comparison of atomic solvation parametric sets: applicability and limitations in protein folding and binding. Protein Sci 4:2499-509.
58. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA (1992):Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:2195-9.
59. Kick EK, Roe DC, Skillman AG Jr, Liu G, TJA, Ewing Sun Y, Kuntz ID, Ellman JA (1997):Structure-based design and combinatorial chemistry yield low nanomolar inhibitors of cathepsin D. Chem Biol 4:297-307.
60. Knegtel RMA, Kuntz ID, Oshiro CM (1997): Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. J Mol Biol 266(2):424-40.
61. Knegtel RMA,Wagener M (1999): Efficacy and selectivity in flexible database docking. Proteins 37:334-45.
62. Kollman PA (1993): Free energy calculations: applications to chemical and biochemical phenomena. Chem Rev 93:2395-417.
63. Kollman PA, Massova I, Reyes C, Kuhn B, Huo S, Chong L, Lee M, Lee T, Duan Y, Wang W, Donini O, Cieplak P, Srinivasan J, Case DA, Cheatham TE, III (2000): Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res 33(12):889-97.
64. Kramer B, Metz G, Rarey M, Lengauer T (1999): Ligand docking and screening with FlexX. Med Chem Res 9(7-8):463-78.
65. Kuhn B, Kollman PA (2000): A ligand that is predicted to bind better to avidin than biotin:insights from computational fluorine scanning. J Am Chem Soc 122(16):3909-16.
66. Kumar S, Ma B, Tsai C, Sinha N, Nussinov R (2000): Folding and binding cascades: dynamic landscapes and population shifts. Protein Sci 9:10-9.
67. Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE (1982): A geometric approach to macromolecular-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 161:269-88.
68. Lamb MD, Jorgensen WL (1997): Computational approaches to molecular recognition. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1:449-57.
69. Lamb ML, Burdick KW, Toba S, Young MM, Skillman AG Jr, Zou X, Arnold JR, Kuntz ID (2001): Design, docking, and evaluation of multiple libraries against multiple targets. Proteins 42:296-318.
70. Lauri G, Bartlett PA (1994): CAVEAT-a program to facilitate the design of organic molecules. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 8(1):51-66.
71. Lawrence MC, Davis PC (1992): CLIX: A search algorithm for finding novel ligands capable of binding proteins of known three-dimensional structure. Proteins 12:31-41.
72. Leach AR (1994): Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. J Mol Biol 235:345-56.
73. Leach AR (1997): A survey of methods for searching the conformational space of small and medium-sized molecules. In: Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB, editors. Reviews in Computational Chemistry. New York: Wiley-VCH, pp 1-55.
74. Leach AR (2001): Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Comprehensive text on major techniques of molecular modeling and computational chemistry.]
75. Leach AR, Hann MM (2000): The in silico world of virtual libraries. Drug Discovery Today 5(8):326-36.
76. Lee CE, Levitt M (1997): Packing as a structural basis of protein stability: understanding mutant properties from wildtype structure. Pacific Symp Biocomput pp 245-255.
77. LEAPFROG, Sybyl Receptor-based Design v6.8, pp 1-159, Tripos Inc., 1699 South Hanley Road, St. Louis, MO 63144.
78. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ (1997): Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Del Rev 23:3-25.
79. Liu M, Wang SM (1999): MCDOCK: A Monte Carlo simulation approach to the molecular docking problem. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 13(5):435-51.
80. Mandell JG, Roberts VA, Pique ME, Kotlovyi V, Mitchell JC, Nelson E, Tsigelny I, Ten Eyck LF (2001): Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. Protein Eng 14(2):105-13.
81. Marshall SA, Mayo SL (2001): Achieving stability and conformational specificity in designed proteins via binary patterning. J Mol Biol 305(3):619-31.
82. Meng EC, Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID (1992): Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation. J Comput Chem 13:505-24.
83. Mertz JE, Pettitt BM (1994): Molecular dynamics at constant pH. Int J Supercomput Ap 8(1):47-53.
84. Miranker A, Karplus M (1991): Functionality maps of binding sites: a multiple copy simultaneous search method. Proteins 11:29-34.
85. Miranker A, Karplus M (1995): An automated method for dynamic ligand design. Proteins 23:472-90.
86. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL (1985): Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18:534-52.
87. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL (1996): Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 256:623-44.
88. Moon JB, Howe JW (1991): Computer design of bioactive molecules: a method for receptorbased de novo ligand design. Proteins 11:314-28.
89. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ (1998):Automated docking using a lamarckian genetic algorithm and an impirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 19:1639-62.
90. Muegge I, Martin YC, Hajduk PJ, Fesik SW (1999): Evaluation of PMF scoring in docking weak ligands to the FK506 binding protein. J Med Chem 42:2498-503.
91. Mulliken RS (1955): Electronic population analysis on LCAO-MO molecular wave functions I. J Chem Phys 23:1833-46.
92. Murphy KP (1999): Predicting binding energetics from structure: looking beyond δG°. Med Res Rev 19(4):333-9.
93. Murray CW, Clark DE, Auton TR, Firth MA, Li J, Sykes RA, Waszkowycz B, Westhead DR, Young SC (1997): PRO SELECT: combining structure-based drug design and combinatorial chemistry for rapid lead discovery. 1. Technology. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 11(2):193-207.
94. Oprea TI, Waller CL (1991): Theoretical aspects of three-dimensional quantitative structureactivity relationships. In: Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB, editors. Reviews in Computational Chemistry. New York: Wiley-VCH, pp 127-82.
95. Pearlman DA (1999): Free energy grids: A practical qualitative application of free energy perturbation to ligand design using the OWFEG method. J Med Chem 42:4313-24.
96. Pearlman DA, Charifson PS (2001): Improved scoring of ligand-protein interactions using OWFEG free energy grids. J Med Chem 44:502-11.
97. Pickett SD, Sternberg MJE (1993): Empirical scale of side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding. J Mol Biol 231:825-39.
98. Pierce AC, Jorgensen WL (2001): Estimation of binding affinities for selective thrombin inhibitors via Monte Carlo simulations. J Med Chem 44:1043-50.
99. Pitera JW, van Gunsteren WF (2001): The importance of solute-solvent van der Waals interactions with interior atoms of biopolymers. J Am Chem Soc 123:3163-4.
100. Plum GE, Breslauer KJ (1995): Calorimetry of proteins and nucleic acids. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:682-90.
101. Rarey M, Wefing S, Lengauer T (1996a) Placement of medium-sized molecular fragments into active sites of proteins. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 10:41-54.
102. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G (1996b) A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J Mol Biol 261:470-89.
103. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T (1999): Docking of hydrophobic ligands with interaction-based matching algorithms. Bioinformatics 15(3):243-50.
104. Rizzo RC, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL (2001): Estimation of binding affinities for HEPT and Nevirapine analogues with HIV-1 reverse transcriptase via Monte Carlo simulations. J Med Chem 44:145-54.
105. Roux B, Yu H-A, Karplus M (1990): Molecular basis for the Born model of ion solvation. J Phys Chem 94:4683-8.
106. Roux B, Simonson T (1999): Implicit solvent models. Biophys Chem 78:1-20. [Review of continuum solvent models and the underlying statistical mechanical basis.]
107. Sadowski J, Kubinyi H (1998): A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. J Med Chem 41:3325-9.
108. Sandak B, Nussiniov R, Wolfson HJ (1995): An automated computer vision and roboticsbased technique for 3-D flexible biomolecular docking and matching. Comput App Biosci.11:87-99.
109. Sandak B, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R (1998): Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins:Insights from an open to closed conformational isomers. Proteins 32:159-74.
110. Schaffer L, Verkhivker GM (1998): Predicting structural effects in HIV-1 protease mutant complexes with flexible ligand docking and protein side-chain optimization. Proteins 33:295-310.
111. Schapira M, Totrov M, Abagyan R (1999): Prediction of the binding energy for small molecules, peptides and proteins. J Mol Recognit 12:177-90.
112. Sitkoff D, Sharp KA, Honig B (1994): Accurate calculation of hydration free energies using macroscopic solvent models. J Phys Chem 98:1978-88.
113. Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley RC, Hendrickson T (1990): Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 112:6127-9.
114. Su AI, Lorber DM, Weston GS, Baase WA, Matthews BW, Shoichet BK (2001): Docking molecules by families to increase the diversity of hits in database screens: computational strategy and experimental evaluation. Proteins 42:279-93.
115. Sun Y, Ewing TJA, Skillman AG Jr, Kuntz ID (1998): CombiDOCK: structure-based combinatorial docking and library design. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 12:597-604.
116. Tame JRH (1999): Scoring functions: a view from the bench. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 13:99-108.
117. Totrov M, Abagyan R (1997): Flexible protein-ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates. Proteins 29(Suppl. 1):215-20.
118. Vakser IA (1995): Protein docking for low-resolution structures. Protein Eng 8:371-7.
119. van de Waterbeemd H, Smith DA, Beaumont K, Walker DK (2001): Property-based design:optimization of drug absorption and pharmacokinetics. J Med Chem 44(9):1313-33.
120. Verkhivker GM, Appelt K, Freer ST, Villafranca JE (1995): Empirical free energy calculations of ligand-protein crystallographic complexes. I. Knowledge-based ligand-protein interaction potentials applied to the prediction of human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease binding affinity. Protein Eng 8(7):677-91.
121. Verkhivker GM, Bouzida D, Gehlaar DK, Rejto PA, Arthurs S, Colson AB, Freer ST, Larson V, Luty BA, Marrone T, Rose PW (2000): Deciphering common failures in molecular docking of ligand-protein complexes. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 14:731-51.
122. Vieth M, Hirst JD, Kolinski A, Brooks CL, III (1998): Assessing energy functions for flexible docking. J Comp Chem 19(14):1612-22.
123. Vorobjev YN, Almagro JC, Hermans J (1998): Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model. Proteins 32:399-413.
124. Wallqvist A, Jernigan RL, Covell DG (1995): A preference-based free-energy parameterization of enzyme-inhibitor binding. Applications to HIV-1-protease inhibitor design. Protein Sci 4:1881-903.
125. Wang J, Wang W, Huo S, Lee M, Kollman PA (2001): Solvation model based on weighted solvent accessible surface area. J Phys Chem B 105:5055-67.
126. Warwicker J, Watson HC (1982): Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to α-helix dipoles. J Mol Biol 157:671-9.
127. Waszkowycz B, Perkin TDJ, Sykes RA, Li J (2001): Large-scale virtual screening for discovering leads in the postgenomic era. IBM Sys J 40(2):360-76.
128. Welch W, Ruppert J, Jain AN (1996): HAMMERHEAD: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chem Biol 3:449-63.
129. Winzor DJ, Sawyer WH (1995): Quantitative Characterization of Ligand Binding. New York:Wiley-Liss.
130. Zhang C, Chen J, DeLisi C (1999): Protein-protein recognition: exploring the energy funnels near the binding sites. Proteins 34:255-67.
131. Zou X, Sun Y, Kuntz ID (1999): Inclusion of solvation in ligand binding free energy calculations using the generalized-Born model. J Am Chem Soc 121:8033-43.