Flexible protein-ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 29, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1997, Pages 215-220

  Totrov, Maxim ^a   Abagyan, Ruben ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Flexible docking; Ligand binding; Molecular recognition

Indexed keywords

5 AMINO 4 IMIDAZOLECARBOXAMIDE RIBOSIDE PHOSPHATE; AMILORIDE; CONCANAVALIN A; FRUCTOSE BISPHOSPHATASE; GLYCOSIDE; ISONIAZID; PANCREATIC ELASTASE; PENTAMIDINE; TRYPSIN; LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; LIGAND BINDING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; RECEPTOR BINDING; SIMULATION; TECHNIQUE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 0031302358     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1997)1+<215::AID-PROT29>3.0.CO;2-Q     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Rosenfeld, R., Vajda, S., DeLisi, C. Flexible docking and design. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 24:677-700, 1995.
2. Janin, J. Protein-protein recognition. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 64:145-166, 1995.
3. Bamborough, P., Cohen, F.E. Modeling protein-ligand complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:236-241, 1996.
4. Lengauer, T., Rarey, M. Computational methods for biomolecular docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:402-406, 1996.
5. Gulukota, K., Vajda, S., Delisi, C. Peptide docking using dynamic programming. J. Comp. Chem. 17:418-428, 1996.
6. Welch, W., Ruppert, J., Jain, A.J. Hammerhead: Fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chem. Biol. 3:449-462, 1996.
7. Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 261:470-489, 1996.
8. Kearsley, S.K., Underwood, D.J., Sheridan, R.P., Miller, M.D. Flexibases: A way to enhance the use of molecular docking methods. J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Design 8:565-82, 1994.
9. Leach, A.R. Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 235:345-356, 1994.
10. Miranker, A., Karplus, M. Functionality maps of binding sites: A multiple copy simultaneous search method. Proteins 11:29-34, 1991.
11. DiNola, A., Raccatano, D., Berendsen, H. Molecular dynamics simulation of the docking of substrates to proteins. Proteins 19:174-182, 1994.
12. Luty, B.A., Wasserman, Z.R., Stouten, P.F.W., Hodge, C.N., Zacharias, M., McCammon, J.A. A molecular mechanics/ grid method for evaluation of ligand-receptor interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 16:454-464, 1995.
13. Hart, T.N., Read, R.J. A multiple-start Monte Carlo docking model. Proteins 13:206-222, 1992.
14. Goodsell A.S., Olson A.J. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins 8:195-202, 1990.
15. Caflisch, A., Niederer, P., Anliker, M. Monte Carlo docking of oligopeptides to proteins. Proteins 13:223-230, 1992.
16. Li, Z., Scheraga, H.A. Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84:6611-6615, 1987.
17. Abagyan, R.A., Totrov, M.M., Kuznetsov, D.A. ICM: a new method for structure modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J. Comp. Chem. 15:488-506, 1994.
18. Abagyan, R.A., Totrov, M.M. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 235:983-1002, 1994.
19. Totrov, M.M., Abagyan, R.A. Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme-antibody complex with 1.6A accuracy. Nature Struct. Biol. 1:259-263, 1994.
20. Strynadka, N.C.J., Eisenstein, M., Katchalski-Katzir, E., et al. Molecular docking programs successfully predict the binding of a beta-lactamase inhibitory protein to TEM-1 beta-lactamase. Nature Struct. Biol. 3:233-239, 1996.
21. Nemethy, G., Gibson, K.D., Palmer, K.A., et al. Energy parameters in polypeptides. 10. Improved geometric parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides. J. Phys. Chem. 96:6472-6484, 1992.
22. Metropolis, N.A., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, N.M., Teller, A.H., Teller, E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1092, 1953.
23. Abagyan, R.A., Argos, P. Optimal protocol and trajectory visualization for conformational searches of peptides and proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 225:519-532, 1992.
24. Zauhar, R.J., Morgan, R.S. A new method for computing the macromolecular electric potential. J. Mol. Biol. 186:815-820, 1985.
25. Totrov, M.M., Abagyan, R.A. The contour-buildup algorithm to calculate the analytical molecular surface. J. Struct. Biol. 116:138-143, 1996.
26. Momany, F.A., McGuire, R.F., Burgess, A.W., Scheraga, H.A. Energy parameters in polypeptides. VII. Geometric parameters, partial atomic charges, nonbonded interactions, hydrogen bond interactions, and intrinsic torsional potentials for the naturally occurring amino acids. J. Phys. Chem. 79:2361-2381, 1975.
27. Frisch, M.J., Trucks, G.W., Schlegel, H.B., et al. Gaussian 94 (Revision A.1). A.. Gaussian 94 (Revision A.1). Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
28. ICM software manual. Version 2.5, Molsoft, LLC, 1996.
29. Allen, F.H., Kennard, O. 3D Search and research using the Cambridge structural database. Chem. Design Autom. News 8:1, 31-37, 1993.
30. Abagyan, R.A., Totrov, M. Contact area difference (CAD): A robust measure to evaluate accuracy of protein models. J. Mol. Biol. 268:678-685, 1997.
31. Hartl, F.U., Martin, J. Protein folding in the cell: The role of molecular chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp80. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 21:293-322, 1992.
32. Jiang, F., Kim, S.-H. "Soft docking": Matching of molecular surface cubes. J. Mol. Biol. 219:79-102, 1991.
33. Bacon, D.J., Moult, J. Docking by least-squares fitting of molecular surface patterns. J. Mol. Biol. 225:849-858, 1992.
34. Goodford, P.J. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J. Med. Chem. 28:849-875, 1985.
35. Novotny, J., Bruccoleri, R.E., Saul, F.A. On the attribution of binding-energy in antigen-antibody complexes Mcpc-603. Biochemistry 28:4735-4749, 1989.
36. Davis, M.E., McCammon, J.A. Electrostatics in biomolecular structure and dynamics. Chem. Rev. 90:509-521, 1990.
37. Honig, B., Nicholls, A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science 268:1144-1149, 1995.
38. Shoichet, B.K., Kuntz, I.D. Protein docking and complementarity. J. Mol. Biol. 221:327-346, 1991.
39. Zacharias, M., Luty, B.A., Davis, M.E., McCammon, J.A. Combined conformational search and finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann approach for flexible docking: Application to an operator mutation in the lambda repressor-operator complex. J. Mol. Biol. 238:455-465, 1994.
40. Jackson, R.M., Sternberg, M.J.E. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: Application to the docking problem. J. Mol. Biol. 250:258-275, 1995.
41. Juffer, A.H., Botta, E.F.F., van Keulen, B.A.M., van der Ploeg, A., Berendsen, H.J.C. The electric potential of a macromolecule in a solvent: A fundamental approach. J. Comput. Phys. 97:144-171, 1991.
42. Bharadwaj, A., Windemuth, A., Sridharan, S., Honig, B., Nicholls, A. The fast multipole boundary element method for molecular electrostatics: An optimal approach for large system. J. Comp. Chem. 16:898-910, 1995.