Docking of hydrophobic ligands with interaction-based matching algorithms

Bioinformatics

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 243-250

  Rarey, M ^a   Kramer, B ^a   Lengauer, T ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR ALGORITHMS AND SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING SCAI   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA BASE; DRUG DESIGN; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; TIME;

EID: 0032950520     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.3.243     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bernstein, F.C., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G.J.B., Meyer, E.F., Jr. Brice, M.D., Rodgers, J.R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T. and Tasumi, M. (1977) The protein data bank: a computer based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol., 112, 535-542.
2. Blaney, J.M. and Dixon, J.S. (1993) A good ligand is hard to find: Automated docking methods. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des., 1, 301-319.
3. Böhm, H.-J. (1992a) The computer program LUDI: A new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 6, 61-78.
4. Böhm, H.-J. (1992b) LUDI: rule-based automatic design of new substituents for enzyme inhibitor leads. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 6, 593-606.
5. Clark, D.E., Frenkel, D., Levy, S.A., Li, J., Murray, C.W., Robson, B., Waszkowycz, B. and Westhead, D.R. (1995) PRO-LIGAND: An approach to de novo molecular design. 1. Application to the design of organic molecules. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 9, 13-32.
6. Guida, W.C. (1994) Software for structure-based drug design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 4, 777-781.
7. Jones, G., Willett, P. and Glen, R.C. (1995) Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J. Mol Biol., 245, 43-53.
8. Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R.C., Leach, A.R. and Taylor, R. (1997) Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol., 267, 727-748.
9. Klebe, G. and Mietzner, T. (1994) A fast and efficient method to generate biologically relevant conformations. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 8, 583-606.
10. Kramer, B., Rarey, M. and Lengauer, T. Validation of the FlexX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking. (submitted for publication).
11. Kuntz, I.D. (1992) Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery. Science, 257, 1078-1082.
12. Lengauer, T. and Rarey, M. (1996) Computational methods for biomolecular docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 6, 402-406.
13. Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T. and Klebe, G. (1996a) A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol., 261, 470-489.
14. Rarey, M., Wefing, S. and Lengauer, T. (1996b) Placement of medium-sized molecular fragments into active sites of proteins. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 10, 41-54.
15. Rarey, M., Kramer, B. and Lengauer, T. (1997) Multiple automatic base selection: Protein-ligand docking based on incremental construction without manual intervention. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 11, 369-384.
16. Rosenfeld, R., Vajda, S. and DeLisi, C. (1995) Flexible docking and design. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 24, 677-700.
17. Welch, W., Ruppert, J. and Jain, A.N. (1996) Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chem. Biol., 3, 449-462.