Protein-protein recognition: Exploring the energy funnels near the binding sites

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 255-267

  Zhang, Chao ^a,b   Chen, Jing ^a   DeLisi, Charles ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding energy; Percentage of native contacts; Protein docking; Rate constant for protein protein association; Structure derived atomic contact energies

Indexed keywords

DOCKING PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENDOPEPTIDASES; ENZYME INHIBITORS; ENZYMES; KINETICS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EID: 0033081069     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990201)34:2<255::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-O     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Wodak SJ, Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 1978;124:323-342.
2. Janin J, Miller S, Chothia C. Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. J Mol Biol 1988;204:155-204.
3. Janin J, Chothia C. The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Biol Chem 1990;265:16027-16030.
4. Jorgensen WL. Rusting of the lock and key model for protein-ligand binding. Science 1991;254:954-955.
5. Levinthal C, Wodak S, Kahn P, Dadivanian A. Hemoglobin interaction in sickle cell fibers. I: theoretical approaches of the molecular contacts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975;72:1330-1334.
6. Jiang F, Kim SH. "Soft docking:" Matching of molecular surface cubes. J Mol Biol 1991;219:79-102.
7. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisentein M, Fresem AA, Afalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: Determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
8. Vakser IA, Aflalo C. Hydrophobic docking: A proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques. Proteins 1994;20:320-329.
9. Meyer M, Wilson P, Schomburg D. Hydrogen bonding and molecular surface shape complementarity as a basis for protein docking. J Mol Biol 1996;264:199-210.
10. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
11. Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 1982;161:269-288.
12. Kuhl FS, Crippen GM, Friesen DK. A combinatorial algorithm for calculating ligand binding. J Comp Chem 1984;5:24-34.
13. Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol 1991;221:79-102.
14. Ewing TJA, Kuntz ID. Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening. J Comp Chem 1997;18:1175-1189.
15. Connolly ML. Analytical molecular surface calculation. J Appl Crystallogr 1983;16:548-558.
16. Lin SL, Nussinov R, Fischer D, Wolfson HJ. Molecular surface representations by sparse critical points. Proteins 1994;18:94-101.
17. 1 subunit interface. Biopolymes 1986;32:1215-1236.
18. Wang H. Grid-search molecular accessible algorithm for solving the protein docking problem. J Comp Chem 1991;12:746-750.
19. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. Biopolymers 1994;34:933-940.
20. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: The critical role played by surface normals at well placed, sparse points in docking. J Mol Biol 1995;252:263-273.
21. Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Efficient detection of three-dimensional motifs in biological macromoleculars by computer vision techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:10495-10499.
22. Fischer D, Novel R, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Surface motifs by a computer vision technique: Searches, detection and implications for protein-ligand recognition. Proteins 1993;16:278-292.
23. Norel R, Fischer D, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Molecular surface recognition by a computer vision technique. Protein Eng 1994;7: 39-46.
24. Fischer D, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J Mol Biol 1995;248:459-477.
25. Wallqvist A, Covell DG. Docking enzyme-inhibitor complexes using a preference-based free-energy surface. Proteins 1996;25: 403-419.
26. Walls PH, Sternberg JE. New algorithms to model protein-protein recognition based on surface complementarity, applications to antibody-antigen docking. J Mol Biol 1992;228:227-297.
27. Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: Application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol 1995;250:258-275.
28. Weng Z, Vajda S, DeLisi C. Prediction of protein complexes using empirical free-energy function. Protein Sci 1996;5:614-626.
29. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;267:707-726.
30. Warwicker J. Investigating protein-protein interaction surfaces using a reduced stereochemical and electrostatic model. J Mol Biol 1989;206:381-395.
31. Zhou H-X. Boundary element solution of macromolecular electrostatics: interaction energy between two proteins. Biophys J 1993; 65:955-963.
32. Honig B, Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science 1995;268:1144-1149.
33. Eisenberg D, McLachlan AD. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 1986;319:199-203.
34. Cummings MD, Hart TN, Read RJ. Atomic solvation parameters in the analysis of protein-protein docking results. Protein Sci 1995;4:2087-2099.
35. Zhang C, Cornette JL, DeLisi C. Consistency in the structural energetics of protein folding and peptide recognition. Protein Sci 1997;6:1057-1064.
36. Vasmatzis G, Zhang C, Cornette JL, DeLisi C. Computational determination of side chain specificity of pockets in class I MHC molecules. Mol Immunol 1996;33:1231-1239.
37. Bears Y. Introduction to the Theory of Error. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1957.
38. Yee DP, Dill KA. Families and the structural relatedness among globular proteins. Protein Sci 1993;2:884-899.
39. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Significance of RMSD in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;235:625-634.
40. Phillips DC. The development of crystallographic enzymology. Biochem Soc Symp 1970;31:11-28.
41. Nishikawa K, Ooi T. Comparison of homologous tertiary structure of proteins. J Theor Biol 1974;43:351-374.
42. Rossmann MG, Liljas A. Recognition of structural domains in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1974;85:177-181.
43. Sippl M. On the problem of comparing protein structures. Development of a new method for the assessment of structural similarities of polypeptide conformations. J Mol Biol 1982;156:359-388.
44. Skolnick J, Kolinski A. Simulations of the folding of a globular protein. Science 1990;250:1121-1125.
45. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993;233:123-138.
46. Abagyan RA, Totrov MM. Contact area difference (CAD): A robust measure to evaluate accuracy of protein models. J Mol Biol 1997;268:678-685.
47. Zhang C. Extracting contact energies from protein structures: A validation using simplified model. Proteins 1998;31:299-308.
48. Zhang C, Kimura SR, Weng Z, Vajda S, Brower RC, DeLisi C. The waters of life. J Franklin Inst 1998;335B:213-240.
49. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4: 187-217.
50. Finkelstein AV, Janin J. The price of lost freedom: Entropy of biomolecular complex formation. Protein Eng 1989;3:1-3.
51. Janin J. Elusive affinities. Proteins 1995;21:30-39.
52. Baldwin RL. The nature of protein folding pathways: The classical versus the new view. J Biomol NMR 1995;5:103-109.
53. Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG, Luthey-Schulten Z, Socci ND. Towards an outline of the topography of a realistic protein folding funnel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:3626-3630.
54. Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG. Funnels, pathways and the energy landscape of protein folding. Proteins 1995;21:167-195.
55. Dill KA, Chan HS. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat Struct Biol 1997;4:10-19.
56. Schellman J. The stability of hydrogen-bonded peptide structures in aqueous solution. Trav Lab Carlsberg Ser Chim 1955;29:230-259.
57. Nemethy G, Scheraga HA. Theoretical determination of sterically allowed conformations of a polypeptide chain by a computer method. Biopolymers 1965;3:155-184.
58. Makhatadze GI, Privalov PL. Energetics of protein structure. Adv Protein Chem 1995;47:307-425.
59. D'Aquino JA, Comez J, Hilser VJ, Lee KH, Amzel LM, Freire E. The magnitude of the backbone conformational entropy change in protein folding. Proteins 1996;25:143-156.
60. Janin J. The kinetics of protein-protein recognition. Proteins 1997;28:153-161.
61. Northrup SH, Erickson HP. Kinetics of protein-protein association explained by browian dynamics computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:3338-3342.
62. Schreiber G, Fersht AR. Rapid, electrostatic assisted association of proteins. Nat Struct Biol 1996;3:427-431.
63. Cohen FE, Sternberg MJ. On the prediction of protein structure: the significance of the root-mean-square deviation. J Mol Biol 1980;138:321-333.
64. Krystek S, Stouch T, Novotny J. Affinity and specificity of serine endopeptidase-protein inhibitor interactions. J Mol Biol 1993;248: 661-679.