The Nature of Phoneme Representation in Spoken Word Recognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 137, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 282-302

  Gaskell, M Gareth ^a   Quinlan, Philip T ^a   Tamminen, Jakke ^a   Cleland, Alexandra A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

lexical access; phoneme; psychological refractory period; spoken word recognition; subcategorical mismatch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; REACTION TIME; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLOR PERCEPTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 44149104579     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.282     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Allopenna P.D., Magnuson J.S., and Tanenhaus M.K. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 38 (1998) 419-439
2. Andruski J.E., Blumstein S.E., and Burton M. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition 52 (1994) 163-187
3. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., and van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM] (1993), University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia
4. Bertelson P., and de Gelder B. The emergence of phonological awareness: Comparative approaches. In: Mattingly I.G., and Studdert-Kennedy M. (Eds). Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception: Comparative approaches (1991), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 393-412
5. Carrier L.M., and Pashler H. Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Expeirmental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 1339-1348
6. Castles A., and Coltheart M. Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?. Cognition 91 (2004) 77-111
7. Chereau C., Gaskell M.G., and Dumay N. Reading spoken words: Orthographic effects in auditory priming. Cognition 102 (2007) 341-360
8. Cleland A.A., Gaskell M.G., Quinlan P.T., and Tamminen J. Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: Evidence from dual-task methodologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 104-119
9. Connine C.M., and Clifton C. Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13 (1987) 291-299
10. Cutler A., and Norris D. Monitoring sentence comprehension. In: Cooper W.E., and Walker E.C.T. (Eds). Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (1979), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 113-134
11. Dahan D., Magnuson J.S., and Tanenhaus M.K. Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 42 (2001) 317-367
12. Dahan D., Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K., and Hogan E.M. Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition. Language and Cognitive Processes 16 (2001) 507-534
13. Davis M.H., Marslen-Wilson W.D., and Gaskell M.G. Leading up the lexical garden path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 218-244
14. Fagot C., and Pashler H. Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 1058-1079
15. Ferreira V.S., and Pashler H. Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (2002) 1187-1199
16. Frost R., and Ziegler J. Speech and spelling interaction: The interdependence of visual and auditory word recognition. In: Gaskell M.G. (Ed). Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (2007), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 107-118
17. Ganong W.F.I. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6 (1980) 110-125
18. Gaskell M.G. Modeling lexical effects on phonetic categorization and semantic effects on word recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000) 329-330
19. Gaskell M.G., and Marslen-Wilson W.D. Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes 12 (1997) 613-656
20. Goldinger S.D. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105 (1998) 251-279
21. Hazeltine E., Ruthruff E., and Remington R.W. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology 52 (2006) 291-345
22. Johnston J.C., and McCann R.S. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (2006) 694-719
23. Johnston J.C., McCann R.S., and Remington R.W. Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science 6 (1995) 365-369
24. Lawson R., Humphreys G.W., and Jolicoeur P. The combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming: One manipulation or two?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 568-581
25. Luce R.D. Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis (1959), Wiley, New York
26. Luck S.J. Sources of dual-task interference: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychological Science 9 (1998) 223-227
27. Magen H., and Cohen A. Location specificity in response selection processes for visual stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (2005) 541-548
28. Magnuson J.S., McMurray B., Tanenhaus M.K., and Aslin R.N. Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: The ghost of Christmash past. Cognitive Science 27 (2003) 285-298
29. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Moss H.E., and van Halen S. Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 1376-1392
30. Marslen-Wilson W.D., and Warren P. Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review 101 (1994) 653-675
31. McCann R.S., Remington R.W., and Van Selst M. A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1352-1370
32. McClelland J.L., and Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18 (1986) 1-86
33. McClelland J.L., Mirman D., and Holt L.L. Are there interactive processes in speech perception?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2006) 363-369
34. McQueen J.M. The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 433-443
35. McQueen J.M. The ghost of Christmas future: Didn't Scrooge learn to be good? Commentary on Magnuson, McMurray, Tanenhaus, and Aslin (2003). Cognitive Science 27 (2003) 795-799
36. McQueen J.M., Cutler A., and Norris D. Flow of information in the spoken word recognition system. Speech Communication 41 (2003) 257-270
37. McQueen J.M., Cutler A., and Norris D. Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science 30 (2006) 1113-1126
38. McQueen J.M., Dahan D., and Cutler A. Continuity and gradedness in speech processing. In: Schiller N.O., and Meyer A.S. (Eds). Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (2003), de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany 39-78
39. McQueen J.M., Norris D., and Cutler A. Lexical influence in phonetic decision making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1363-1389
40. Meyer D.E., and Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 749-791
41. Mirman D., McClelland J.L., and Holt L.L. Attentional modulation of lexical effects on speech perception: Computational and behavioral experiments. In: Sun R., and Miyake N. (Eds). Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2006), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 591-596
42. Morais J., and Kolinsky R. Perception and awareness in phonological processing: The case of the phoneme. Cognition 50 (1994) 287-297
43. Navon D., and Miller J. Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology 44 (2002) 193-251
44. Norris D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52 (1994) 189-234
45. Norris D., McQueen J.M., and Cutler A. Merging information in spoken word recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000) 299-370
46. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 116 (1994) 220-244
47. Pashler H.E. The psychology of attention (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
48. Pierrehumbert J.B. Word-specific phonetics. In: Gussenhoven C., and Warner N. (Eds). Laboratory phonology 7 (2002), de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany 101-139
49. Pitt M.A., and Samuel A.G. An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 699-725
50. Plant R.R., Hammond N., and Whitehouse T. Toward an experimental timing standards lab: Benchmarking precision in the real world. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34 (2002) 218-226
51. Read C., Zhang Y., Nie H., and Ding B. The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition 24 (1986) 31-44
52. Reynolds M., and Besner D. Reading aloud is not automatic: Processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 1303-1323
53. Rodd J.M., Gaskell M.G., and Marslen-Wilson W.D. Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science 28 (2004) 89-104
54. Rubin P., Turvey M.T., and Van Gelder P. Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than nonwords. Perception & Psychophysics 19 (1976) 394-398
55. Salverda A.P., Dahan D., and McQueen J.M. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition 90 (2003) 51-89
56. Salverda, A. P., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006, August). Lexical activation is affected by durational information established with respect to preceding phonetic context. Paper presented at the AMLaP Conference, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
57. Samuel A.G. The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 (1981) 1124-1131
58. Samuel A.G., and Pitt M.A. Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation. Journal of Memory and Language 48 (2003) 416-434
59. Scharenborg O., Norris D., ten Bosch L., and McQueen J.M. How should a speech recognizer work?. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 867-918
60. Serniclaes W., Sprenger-Charolles L., Carré R., and Demonet J.F. Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44 (2001) 384-399
61. Serniclaes W., Ventura P., Morais J., and Kolinsky R. Categorical perception of speech sounds in illiterate adults. Cognition 98 (2005) B35-B44
62. Sigman M., and Dehaene S. Parsing a cognitive task: A characterization of the mind's bottleneck. PLoS Biology 3 (2005) 334-349
63. Strauss T.J., Harris H.D., and Magnuson J.S. jTRACE: A reimplementation and extension of the TRACE model of speech perception and spoken word recognition. Behavior Research Methods 39 (2007) 19-30
64. Streeter L.A., and Nigro G.N. The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65 (1979) 1533-1541
65. Tombu M., and Jolicoeur P. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 3-18
66. Tombu M., and Jolicoeur P. Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 790-802
67. Van Galen G.P., and ten Hoopen G. Speech control and single channelness. Acta Psychologica 40 (1976) 245-255
68. Warren R.M. Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science 167 (1970, January 23) 392-393
69. Warren R.M. Phonemic organization does not occur: Hence no feedback. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000) 350-351
70. Whalen D.H. Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgements. Perception & Psychophysics 35 (1984) 49-64
71. Ziegler J.C., and Ferrand L. Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5 (1998) 683-689