Flow of information in the spoken word recognition system

Speech Communication

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 257-270

  McQueen, James M ^a   Cutler, Anne ^a   Norris, Dennis ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Feedback; Levels of processing; Phonetic categorization; Spoken word recognition

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; FEEDBACK; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION SYSTEMS;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 0038356394     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00108-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Burton M.W., Baum S.R., Blumstein S.E. Lexical effects on the phonetic categorization of speech: The role of acoustic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;567-575.
2. Connine C.M., Clifton C. Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 13:1987;291-299.
3. Connine C.M., Titone D., Deelman T., Blasko D. Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. 37:1997;463-480.
4. Cutler A. Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech. 29:1986;201-220.
5. Cutler A., van Donselaar W. Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech. 44:2001;171-195.
6. Cutler A., Mehler J., Norris D., Seguí J. Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology. 19:1987;141-177.
7. Cutler A., Dahan D., van Donselaar W. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech. 40:1997;141-201.
8. Elman J.L., McClelland J.L. Exploiting lawful variability in the speech wave. Perkell J.S., Klatt D.H. Invariance and Variability of Speech Processes. 1986;360-380 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
9. Elman J.L., McClelland J.L. Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language. 27:1988;143-165.
10. Fox R.A. Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 10:1984;526-540.
11. Frauenfelder U.H., Floccia C. The recognition of spoken words. Friederici A. Language Comprehension: A Biological Perspective. 1998;1-40 Springer, Berlin.
12. Frauenfelder U.H., Scholten M., Content A. Bottom-up inhibition in lexical selection: Phonological mismatch effects in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes. 16:2001;583-607.
13. Ganong W.F. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 6:1980;110-125.
14. Gaskell M.G., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes. 12:1997;613-656.
15. Luce P.A., Goldinger S.D., Auer E.T., Vitevitch M.S. Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics. 62:2000;615-625.
16. Marslen-Wilson W., Warren P. Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review. 101:1994;653-675.
17. Massaro D.W. Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology. 21:1989;398-421.
18. McClelland J.L. The case for interactionism in language processing. Coltheart M. Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading. 1987;3-36 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology. 18:1986;1-86.
20. McQueen J.M. The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;433-443.
21. McQueen J.M., Norris D., Cutler A. Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;1363-1389.
22. McQueen J.M., Norris D., Cutler A. Can lexical knowledge modulate prelexical representations over time? Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech Recognition as Pattern Classification. 2001;9-14 MPI for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.
23. Miller J.L., Dexter E.R. Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 14:1988;369-378.
24. Newman R.S., Sawusch J.R., Luce P.A. Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23:1997;873-889.
25. Norris D.G. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition. 52:1994;189-234.
26. Norris D., McQueen J.M., Cutler A. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23:2000;299-370.
27. Pitt M.A. The locus of the lexical shift in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21:1995;1037-1052.
28. Pitt M.A., McQueen J.M. Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? Journal of Memory and Language. 39:1998;347-370.
29. Pitt M.A., Samuel A.G. An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19:1993;699-725.
30. Pylyshyn Z. Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22:1999;341-423.
31. Rubin P., Turvey M.T., van Gelder P. Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than in nonwords. Perception & Psychophysics. 19:1976;394-398.
32. Samuel A.G. Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 110:1981;474-494.
33. Samuel A.G. Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 125:1996;28-51.
34. Samuel A.G. Lexical activation produces potent phonemic percepts. Cognitive Psychology. 32:1997;97-127.
35. Samuel A.G. Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychological Science. 12:2001;348-351.
36. Soto-Faraco S., Sebastián-Gallés N., Cutler A. Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language. 45:2001;412-432.